Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Very few people in elected positions ask for help in dealing with rampant crime because it can be seen as an admission of failure. Yes, I'm aware of the New Mexico situation. I think trump is an opportunist that sees a chance to both stroke his ego and drive home the perception that dims are soft on crime to help himself in the mid terms. The bar in dc is so low that he almost can't fail to reduce crime so it will do what he wants it to do. I also think part of the reason he is acting now is to take advantage of the "crime fatigue" that exists in the country driven in part by videos and acts spread across social media. All of those things are smart politics and will help define dims. All of that is one facet of the issue. The other is that, like securing the border, it just isn't that hard of a task to do if you put the people in place and get out of their way, ensure accountability, and get criminals off the street. This is going to be both a political win for trump and a win for dc as crime will go down. Losers will be the dim party as a whole and local dim officials. Maybe this will have an effect on other crime plagued cities to change their policies to those tougher on crime.I am "believing" that Trump didn't need to be involved because no one in an elected position to speak for the people of DC asked for federal assistance. I think the application of federal force should be based on clear and present danger. I do not think a "police source living it every day" meets that bar. I don't think the available statistics meet that bar, I don't think available facts meet that bar. What's the bar level for you to allow federal force in any town?
All of these Democratic “smart people” are advising Democratic politicians not to fight Trump on crime, to which I say: BULLSHIT. Democrats, fight. Fight Trump on crime like you're learning how to fight him on immigration. Remember? That was another big issue that you weren’t supposed to touch because you didn’t poll real well on the issue of immigration. That was a winning issue for Trump.“Oh, hey, Democrats. Don’t fight Trump on this crime issue. This is not a good issue for you. The polls say—and all the surveys say—Trump’s strong on crime, and you’re not, Democrats. So don’t fight him on this issue as he puts the fucking military on the streets in another American city for no fucking need.”
Well, there is a hell of lot more criming happening in Brentwood than in front of the friggin' Lincoln Memorial or the Reflecting Pool, so I reckon if the object is to "reduce crime" in DC, maybe going into Brentwood, period, would be a good place to start, instead of wasting taxpayer dollars taking selfies with soccer moms chaperoning middle school field trips in front of Honest Abe..Do you expect the national guard to go into Brentwood without carrying guns?
Instead of being in a lather you guys would be foaming at the mouth if the national guard were carrying guns and conducting patrols in brentwood.Well, there is a hell of lot more criming happening in Brentwood than in front of the friggin' Lincoln Memorial or the Reflecting Pool, so I reckon if the object is to "reduce crime" in DC, maybe going into Brentwood, period, would be a good place to start, instead of wasting taxpayer dollars taking selfies in front of Honest Abe..
According to 4thgen, your mom is a misogynist for saying that. She shouldn't disparage titties.Worthless as tits on a boar hog as my Mom used to say.
She smoked like a chimney.According to 4thgen, your mom is a misogynist for saying that. She shouldn't disparage titties.
Sounds like I would like your mom. Does / did she dip snuff?
Depends, was the sub toasted? Toasted rolls have some sharp edges.My guess that they'll have to plead the sandwich preppie down to a misdemeanor - they'll never bring the felony charge to a DC jury.
Trump's placating liberals?Instead of being in a lather you guys would be foaming at the mouth if the national guard were carrying guns and conducting patrols in brentwood.
I really don't understand why you're projecting this stuff onto us. First of all, I have a problem, period, with American military personnel being deployed on American streets harassing American citizens. Full stop. At one point in time before you surrendered all of your conservative principles, you'd have agreed with that. Doesn't matter who the president is, doesn't matter who the party in power is- American military personnel do not belong on American city streets harassing and detaining American citizens. I'm legitimately saddened that you find that to be disagreeable. I legit thought that was like Day One of Conservative 101 stuff: "Thou shalt not endorse federal government overreach, especially that which involves the American military."Instead of being in a lather you guys would be foaming at the mouth if the national guard were carrying guns and conducting patrols in brentwood.
Given that the gop is more popular than the dim party what are you guys jerking off to? gay porn? bestiality porn?The entire GOP is just jerking off to an endless stream of AI midget porn. That’s the level at which they’re all operating these days.
Many in that generation did. Still sounds like my kind of woman.She smoked like a chimney.
You spelled "no credible evidence of law enforcement leadership fudging data" wrong as well. And it's strange how White House Press Secretary Katherine Leavitt said just this morning on Fox & Friends that the data was accurate. Trumpers can't keep their story straight, it would seem.You spelled “law enforcement leadership has been fudging data” wrong.
You know homelessness isn't typically that people are just lazy. Yes there's a percentage that are mentally challenged, and a percentage that are addicted and need help, but the fastest growing group is a group that I believe will surprise most.Looking at a live feed of Union Station. Looking good! No homeless tents, no beggars or trash.
Jesus fucking Christ…Some weird shit in your head equates gay porn and “bestiality” porn and then spews it out as some sort of insult. You really don’t understand how fucked up some of the things you’re saying here are, huh?Given that the gop is more popular than the dim party what are you guys jerking off to? gay porn? bestiality porn?
Your characterization that they are harassing American citizens contradicts your claim that they are just taking selfies with tourists.I really don't understand why you're projecting this stuff onto us. First of all, I have a problem, period, with American military personnel being deployed on American streets harassing American citizens. Full stop. At one point in time before you surrendered all of your conservative principles, you'd have agreed with that. Doesn't matter who the president is, doesn't matter who the party in power is- American military personnel do not belong on American city streets harassing and detaining American citizens. I'm legitimately saddened that you find that to be disagreeable. I legit thought that was like Day One of Conservative 101 stuff: "Thou shalt not endorse federal government overreach, especially that which involves the American military."
Second of all, are you seriously implying that if the roles were reversed and a Democratic president ordered American military personnel into the trailer parks and hollers of bumfuck America to harass rural conservatives, you'd just happily go along with that kind of federal overreach? No? Well then why the hypocrisy in this case?
Third of all, the fact that they AREN'T going into Brentwood or Anacostia period, and are instead talking selfies with tourists on the National Mall....does that not send up huge red flags to you? You know, if the whole point of this charade is to REDUCE CRIME, why would they not be going into the areas where the ACTUAL VIOLENT CRIMING IS HAPPENING? Is it because, perhaps, it's all theater?