Trump Admin takes over D.C. Policing

  • Thread starter Thread starter nycfan
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies: 2K
  • Views: 48K
  • Politics 
The Democrats don't want any help in the warzones they call safe neighborhoods because they don't want their incompetence exposed.
I live in an area you call a war zone. I have zero concerns about my safety. Go fuck yourself, you racist piece of shit. You've never even been to these places that you so comfortably disparage.

I will add that those "warzones" subsidize your fat white ass. Your entire community just mooches off the tax revenue created by places like Chicago, New York City, Los Angeles, etc,
 
Y

To re-ask the question that's been asked earlier - what's your solution to homelessness?

I don't have all the answers and haven't claimed to have them. Probably a combination of rural camp sites where they can receive the appropriate treatment and finding a way to place a number of them in mental institutions for full time treatments. Rural settings are best for a number of mental illnesses so you need to get them out of the cities for their sake (and the residents). Unfortunately, I think you'll find that some percentage of the homeless who enjoy the lifestyle of hanging out and taking drugs all day.
 
I guess then you agree with Brandon Johnson who proclaimed at the “Workers Over Billionaires” rally that Chicago was built by slavers and indigenous peoples? Woke > actual history = virtue signaling to please other liberals.

Agree. It's the same thing with the homeless and the encampments which hurt the quality of life in many big cities. Trump goes in and cleans out Union Square and gets rid of the homeless encampments in the various parks which instantly improves the life of the residents and tourists alike. This is a major embarrassment to city mayors and a governor like Newsom since California's homelessness crisis has exploded during his watch.

It doesn't really matter where the homeless go since it's the Mayor's duty to keep his/her city clean and safe. The State and Federal governments need to address the larger issues of homelessness.
1. I didn't hear Brandon Johnson say anything about Chicago being built by slaves and indigenous peoples. He said something about "this land" being built that way. Do you dispute that slaves and indigenous people (and Chinese) built much of America? Or maybe the problem is that you don't think Chicago is part of "this land"? Or maybe you have listening comprehension problems? Or maybe you get your news from Jesse Fucking Watters?

2. Are you really going to try to bring "actual history" into this? That is like UNC football begging for a game against the Chiefs. Plus, your guy doesn't even know who Frederick Douglass was.
 
I don't have all the answers and haven't claimed to have them. Probably a combination of rural camp sites where they can receive the appropriate treatment and finding a way to place a number of them in mental institutions for full time treatments. Rural settings are best for a number of mental illnesses so you need to get them out of the cities for their sake (and the residents). Unfortunately, I think you'll find that some percentage of the homeless who enjoy the lifestyle of hanging out and taking drugs all day.
"Rural camp sites" for homeless people. Great idea.
1756912865365.png
 
I don't have all the answers and haven't claimed to have them. Probably a combination of rural camp sites where they can receive the appropriate treatment and finding a way to place a number of them in mental institutions for full time treatments. Rural settings are best for a number of mental illnesses so you need to get them out of the cities for their sake (and the residents). Unfortunately, I think you'll find that some percentage of the homeless who enjoy the lifestyle of hanging out and taking drugs all day.
Rural settings are best for a number of mental illnesses? WTF? You're a psychiatrist now?

When you are making up complete horseshit to justify something that can't be justified, do you think maybe you should reflect on how you got here?
 
I don't have all the answers and haven't claimed to have them. Probably a combination of rural camp sites where they can receive the appropriate treatment and finding a way to place a number of them in mental institutions for full time treatments. Rural settings are best for a number of mental illnesses so you need to get them out of the cities for their sake (and the residents). Unfortunately, I think you'll find that some percentage of the homeless who enjoy the lifestyle of hanging out and taking drugs all day.
This is, at least, a start. Can you clarify what you mean by "rural camp sites" and "appropriate treatment"?
 
I don't have all the answers and haven't claimed to have them. Probably a combination of rural camp sites where they can receive the appropriate treatment and finding a way to place a number of them in mental institutions for full time treatments. Rural settings are best for a number of mental illnesses so you need to get them out of the cities for their sake (and the residents). Unfortunately, I think you'll find that some percentage of the homeless who enjoy the lifestyle of hanging out and taking drugs all day.
That at least is a concept of a plan. Maybe expand on and advocate for this instead of just cheering shooing homeless people from one area to another. If you move a homeless person out of a tent or off a sidewalk, it's not like they just go home.
 
I don't have all the answers and haven't claimed to have them. Probably a combination of rural camp sites where they can receive the appropriate treatment and finding a way to place a number of them in mental institutions for full time treatments. Rural settings are best for a number of mental illnesses so you need to get them out of the cities for their sake (and the residents). Unfortunately, I think you'll find that some percentage of the homeless who enjoy the lifestyle of hanging out and taking drugs all day.

I do not know how anyone could read this post and come to any other conclusion except that you're a bat shit crazy lunatic.
 
Unfortunately, I think you'll find that some percentage of the homeless who enjoy the lifestyle of hanging out and taking drugs all day.
Ding, ding ding. That last sentence shows you are so close to understanding. Do you think homeless people will voluntarily relocate to rural camps? No, they won’t. And when you tear down an encampment, they just relocate and start a new encampment.

That doesn’t mean you never remove encampments for public safety reasons. It just means that “cleaning up” the encampments does not solve anything on a long-term basis.
 
Rural settings are best for a number of mental illnesses? WTF? You're a psychiatrist now?

When you are making up complete horseshit to justify something that can't be justified, do you think maybe you should reflect on how you got here?
The inability to reflect is a hallmark of maga.

Themes that dominate maga include never apologize, never admit a mistake, empathy is for pussies, I know as much as any expert on any subject, my values are whatever trump said today.

Magats are in a state of perpetual arrested development. Growth is weakness.
 
Celebrating throwing away tents of people without homes or other shelter …
I think many people, mostly Maga types but perhaps no small number of non-Magas, wouldn't be upset or even phased if someone, maybe even law enforcement, went into homeless camps and wholesale murdered the people living there. The homeless are considered trash people, if they're even afforded that modicum of humanity in the imaginations of the people who hate them. If they are treated like trash and simply gotten rid of, that would seem like a perfectly appropriate way of handling the homeless "situation" to these people...
 
Has anyone here read Herman Wouk's "The Winds of War" and "War and Remembrance"? He's best known for "The Caine Mutiny," but I think the other two are his best works. I read them 20+ years ago, but I'm re-reading them right now. I find something every 4-5 pages that connects directly with what MAGA is doing today.
 
National Guard is helping DC by cleaning out the homeless camps and cleaning up areas like Union Square. This, perhaps, will inspire the MPD to not let this get out of hand in the future as Trump will simply call the Guard back in to clean things up - which should embarrass the Mayor and MPD. Same with crime but yes Trump should allow more funding specifically to hire more officers for a long term solution.

Don’t think Trump is actually deploying the Guard to other cities (over the objection of mayors) unless to guard and protect Federal property. It’s more of a head fake to make Dem Mayors support the status quos on crime while he is seen as wanting “do something” about crime.
This might deserve its own thread, but my question to you is: what will you do if you're wrong, and what should you expect us to do?

1. Normally, people tend to be more trustworthy when they have skin in the game. Bullshit is free, and thus does it flow freely like Wuffie tears. When you have a stake in the outcome, then at least the bullshit comes with a cost. This is why, for instance, executives of companies are paid with company stock. They are less likely to peddle bullshit about how they are wisely reinvesting profits in money-losing projects. Skin in the game is by no means a guarantee of integrity, but all else equal, it's better than no.

2. So what is your skin in the game? Surely if you actually believe that Trump is only head faking here, you'd commit to do something in the event that you're wrong. Like this: put $10K in an escrow account, beneficiary ZZLP, payable in the event that Trump is not just head faking. If you did that, then it would certainly improve your perceived sincerity. But you won't do that, will you? Because then you'd have to address the reality of the situation, and not just the fairy tales you like to tell.

3. If you don't take accountability for your political views, what should the rest of us do? It's one thing to have a disagreement about taxes or teaching history in schools. It's another entirely for us to descend into civil war, which seems likely if it isn't already happening. By civil war, I'm not referring to a shooting war; more of a Cold War type of thing given that a full civil war isn't really possible in a country with nuclear weapons. If we have troops occupying our cities, it means our constitutional republic is over.

You know this. It has been told to you many times. And when the stakes are this high, what consequences should come to those responsible? Nothing? Should nothing happen to you at all? You actively support a fascist destruction of our democratic republic, and your consequences should be nothing?

4. I don't think your consequence will be nothing. If Trump does attempt a full fascist takeover -- remember, we're seven months into a 4 year term -- then I don't think anyone will be in a forgiving mood if he fails (again). If he succeeds and then we have to fight just to preserve our country, there will be even less forgiveness.

I suspect a lot of people will be thrown in camps. You know, like Alligator Alcatraz. The things that you build and create in order to torture others will be used against you. That's what I think.

Wouldn't you deserve it? Why shouldn't we do to you what you so eagerly want to do to others?

5. Do you see what I'm getting at here? If you foresee consequences to you, then probably you'd have to be more careful in what and who you support. And isn't that the way it should be when the fate of the Republic is at stake? I mean, if you think I'm wildly exaggerating the threat, then you've got nothing to worry about, do you? Why not commit to seppuku if Trump declares martial law? I did back in the day, when someone I knew was going on about how Obama wanted to be like a king. I wrote out a brief contract stating that if Obama assumed dictatorial powers, I would ritually disembowel myself from shame. That was more of a rhetorical move given that the contract was not enforceable, but I would have committed myself to seppuku if there was a legal mechanism. Because I knew that the threat was zero.

You don't think the threat is zero, do you? And that's the problem.

So what should be the punishment to you for actively supporting the fascist destruction of the United States Of America?
 
The inability to reflect is a hallmark of maga.

Themes that dominate maga include never apologize, never admit a mistake, empathy is for pussies, I know as much as any expert on any subject, my values are whatever trump said today.

Magats are in a state of perpetual arrested development. Growth is weakness.
This is why consequences must come to them. And we must be clear eyed about what needs to be done.
 
Back
Top