Trump Criminal & Civil Cases | GA Supremes DQ Willis

  • Thread starter Thread starter nycfan
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies: 623
  • Views: 26K
  • Politics 
Basically, Trump’s attorneys are threatening the outgoing AG with criminal prosecution by the incoming AG.
 
For the record, federal regulations address this very issue squarely and directly:

CFR 600.8: "At the conclusion of the Special Counsel's work, he or she shall provide the Attorney General with a confidential report explaining the prosecution or declination decisions reached by the Special Counsel."

CFR 600.9: "The Attorney General may determine that public release of these reports would be in the public interest,"

I don't even know what Trump's lawyers are arguing. Probably nothing -- just more of their sound-and-fury litigation nonsense that, in a sane world, would end with their disbarment.
 
Will be just like the Mueller report, one sided without due process cross
Nothing on the planet Earth has been more comprehensively explained than Jack Smith’s charging decisions
And he is a legally disqualified special prosecutor regarding trump
Pure politics
 
Last edited:
In an extraordinary development, the Appellate Division, First Department, scheduled oral argument at 12:30 p.m. on President-elect Trump’s appeal of Judge Juan Merchan’s rejection of his immunity claims and order that Trump be sentenced this Friday afternoon.
 
We are talking about the stolen documents case right? The one sure case that should have been prosecuted quicker, and easily provable.
 


I mean, she has no jurisdiction of any kind over the DC subversion case.

200.gif
 
Cannon was already a shoe-in for the 11th Circuit, but I'll be surprised if she's not on the SCOTUS short lists now. She's an abysmal judge, but I have to give her credit as a political operator.
 
lawtig02 said:
Cannon was already a shoe-in for the 11th Circuit, but I'll be surprised if she's not on the SCOTUS short lists now. She's an abysmal judge, but I have to give her credit as a political operator.
Click to expand...
I haven't found the motions. This comes from NBC:

A senior law enforcement official told NBC News that the Justice Department has concluded it likely cannot release the classified documents portion of Smith’s special counsel report, because of a local federal rule in the southern district of Florida prohibiting the release of information about pending cases. The rule was raised in the motion filed by Trump’s co-defendants.

Is this right? Since when does a local federal rule in a district court supersede CFR and for that matter the federal statute?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top