Trump loses sexual offense appeal.

  • Thread starter Thread starter uncgriff
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies: 159
  • Views: 4K
  • Politics 
Zoo_View said:
Why?

He’s going to troll you AGAIN and AGAIN.

Facts don’t matter to MAGAts.
Click to expand...
It would take someone far, far more intelligent and clever than the ram to troll me. Plus, I don’t think he’s trolling one bit- I think he legitimately believes 100% of what he says.
 
CFordUNC said:
It would take someone far, far more intelligent and clever than the ram to troll me. Plus, I don’t think he’s trolling one bit- I think he legitimately believes 100% of what he says.
Click to expand...
Some trolls are only cosplaying online, other trolls exist in real life and simply post as themselves online.
 
SnoopRob said:
You have the moral backbone of a chocolate eclair.
Click to expand...
I find your apparent understanding of morals in politics interesting, and question if self-serving and hypocritical. Were you equally repulsed by clinton's serial sexual abuse of women? Maybe so. My question wasn't an accusation. I think you have to view morals in politics in a different light. It didn't use to be that way but clinton kind of blew the lid off of that given his long list of accusers. The question of trump's morality has never been in doubt with me. Then too, neither has biden's. When voting for potus, morality is but one variable to take into consideration. Lot different weight then voting for city council. This board's TDS, anger at losing all g'ment control, and having a conservative court that you mostly disagree with, IMO clouds any objectivity you may have as it relates to morality at the highest levels of g'ment. Let's be real, morality isn't the number 1 issue you consider when deciding whom to vote for. I have zero doubt trump is sleezy. I also have no doubt biden was as well. Maybe kamala doesn't grope men and grab them by their dicks, but she is absolutely incompetent, unintelligent, simple minded, inexperienced, a flaming liberal, and would do far more harm to this country than another term of trump's past moral lapses. Her supposed "handle" on the border showed she is incapable of doing the job. So far, trump hasn't destroyed democracy, your 401K is doing just fine, unemployment and inflation haven't blown up, and the price of eggs is down. So when questioning people's moral compass, you might put more thought into maybe there is more to the equation.
 
BlueSteel said:
You’re both freaking lunatics. I’m done with being force fed your un-American and morally bankrupt drivel. You’ve been given plenty of runway here on this board, and you’ve chosen willful ignorance every step of the way. You’re not here for any sort of good-faith debate. It’s clear that your only goal is to antagonize anyone who doesn’t share your warped worldviews and spread misinformation on behalf of your cult. You can fuck right off with that. I will not be forced to entertain your nonsense any longer. #superignore
Click to expand...
Ignore is for vaginas Karen. Grow up.
 
Zoo_View said:
Super,

I’m not going to question your legal knowledge versus mine……you know infinitely more.

I’m expressing my opinion. Elected officials who commit crimes should be thrown under the prison. Bill Clinton committed perjury.

He did.

Throw the shithead UNDER the prison. He was POTUS, not a Clerk of Deeds or State Legislator or County Commissioner.

I’ll never defend the schmuck. He was POTUS and had “sex” depending on how one defines sex with a YOUNG intern…..at the least he’s guilty of sexual harassment……don’t care whether or not that was a criminal offense back then…..he’s guilty of sexually harassing a young women in his employ.

I voted for him in ‘92 and ‘96. Talked him up in ‘87 and ‘88 even after his ATROCIOUS keynote speech at the North Carolina Democratic State Convention in 1987 in which he’d bored the ENTIRE audience into the ground.

He committed perjury. We all know he did. He’s a pig.
Click to expand...
I was just saying that there would have been no point trying to get an indictment. I don't really have an opinion about the perjury itself. I certainly don't feel as strongly about it as you do, but I can respect that. That's a question of ought. The practical question is "will pursuing an indictment be worth the time,?" To me the answer is pretty clearly no.
 
Zoo_View said:
Thanks. So, Clinton admitted to perjury as part of a lenient plea bargain.
Click to expand...
But he didn't, right? He sort of took responsibility without actually doing so. And the plea bargain was useful to him in a public relations sense; but it was useful also for the prosecution, who would be able to get some reprimand when the alternative would be almost certain acquittal.
 
superrific said:
I was just saying that there would have been no point trying to get an indictment. I don't really have an opinion about the perjury itself. I certainly don't feel as strongly about it as you do, but I can respect that. That's a question of ought. The practical question is "will pursuing an indictment be worth the time,?" To me the answer is pretty clearly no.
Click to expand...
I’m of the opinion that trying a guy like Clinton for perjury would have been worth it……the schmuck was guilty. Democrats would have benefited from trying him……even if the result was a hung jury or an acquittal.

Democrats were going to be excoriated for “letting Slick Willie go.”
 
The eighties were weird.
Just finished the Pee-Wee documentary and he got crucified for bullshit charges of masturbating and obscenity. He wasn't a pedophile but Trump was and gets a pass. Glad this charge stuck.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top