Trump to take over D.C. Policing | Chicago Next

  • Thread starter Thread starter nycfan
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies: 1K
  • Views: 28K
  • Politics 
Conspiracy theorists always have their reasoning and when you question it, they always have the next reason. Neither LA or DC was a test run for anything.
Done with you. You are either very naive or very stupid if you think anything Trump does is for good.
 
I think it's pretty clear the admin was, at a minimum, testing whether NG deployment (a) sufficiently bothered blue cities and their leadership, (b) distracted from unfavorable stories, (c) played well with the base, and (d) was a beneficial wedge issue.

The answer being yes to all of the above, I'd expect it to continue.
 

Trump administration plans big immigration enforcement operation in Chicago as soon as next week​



“… Chicago was among the first cities targetedin immigration enforcement operations when Trump took office in January. The administration also sued the city over its so-called sanctuary policies, though the case was dismissed when a judge ruled the federal government lacked the legal standing to bring the challenge, and threatened to withhold federal funding, which was also blocked by a judge.

Now, the anticipated operations in Chicago are expected to be at a larger scale, using personnel from Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Customs and Border Protection, and possibly other agencies. Officials are preparing the National Guard to help if a peacekeeping presence is needed, akin to what unfolded in Los Angeles following protests, the sources said.

Preparations for Chicago are already underway, including sending armored vehicles to the city in the coming days and surging federal agents by next Friday, Sept. 5, when, according to two sources, the operation is expected to kick off. Discussions, however, are still ongoing and planning is in flux.…”

——
Short version, they are planning large scale, intentionally provocative ICE actions intended to create protests as a pretext for sending in the national guard and military to quell the protests.
Your short version is 1000% accurate.
 
I think it's pretty clear the admin was, at a minimum, testing whether NG deployment (a) sufficiently bothered blue cities and their leadership, (b) distracted from unfavorable stories, (c) played well with the base, and (d) was a beneficial wedge issue.

The answer being yes to all of the above, I'd expect it to continue.
Not sure the order is correct, but those are the key points.
 
I mean... clearly, at the very least, LA was a test run for DC and probably Chicago.
LA was just marines standing around federal buildings.

DC was an effective program to actively address crime in an area that is in the jurisdiction of the federal government.

For some reason, the federal government taking steps to decrease crime in a federal run area has many people upset.
 
LA was just marines standing around federal buildings.

DC was an effective program to actively address crime in an area that is in the jurisdiction of the federal government.

For some reason, the federal government taking steps to decrease crime in a federal run area has many people upset.
DC is not under the jurisdiction of the federal government in the sense you are conveyjng here. Not at all.
 


This is true (and I don’t think Trump wants a solution other than get them out of sight), but it’s not like we’ve seen anyone else in this country with a humane solution that has had more than incremental success.
 
Back
Top