Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
How do you know that data is exclusively - or majority - Trump voters submitting those searches? Is that shown in the data? If not, can you understand why that seems to not quite line up with what we just saw six days ago?You, like MAGA, can choose to believe whatever you like. I sourced the information from google and you can too.
I wonder if there was a test to be able to vote, to ensure people read the candidates positions, what percentage of Americans would be allowed to vote.OTOH, the "how do tariffs work" search I totally believe. Hopefully they also searched for "should I read about the issues before I vote?"
I don’t think that these are MAGA. These are probably low information voters who make a last second decision.I could be wrong, but color me a bit skeptical on this. Are we supposed to believe that the MAGA or MAGA-curious, I-only-get-my-news-from-social-media-or-Fox-News crowd, suddenly became self-reflective and/or contemplative? Before any actual Trump 2025 policies have been implemented or consequences have occurred? Since we seem to be in actual Bizarroworld, maybe those searches were submitted by Democratic voters (/s)
OTOH, the "how do tariffs work" search I totally believe. Hopefully they also searched for "should I read about the issues before I vote?"
How do you know that data is exclusively - or majority - Trump voters submitting those searches? Is that shown in the data? If not, can you understand why that seems to not quite line up with what we just saw six days ago?
Perhaps it's not me choosing to believe something that may not necessarily be true.
ETA: Your snark towards me is sorely misplaced. If you've read any of my posts in the entire time I've been here, I detest MAGA, Donald Trump, and the whole enchilada of whatever passes as (a) Republican these days.
I wonder if there was a test to be able to vote, to ensure people read the candidates positions, what percentage of Americans would be allowed to vote.
It doesn’t make sense for a Harris voter to do such a search.How do you know that data is exclusively - or majority - Trump voters submitting those searches? Is that shown in the data? If not, can you understand why that seems to not quite line up with what we just saw six days ago?
Perhaps it's not me choosing to believe something that may not necessarily be true.
ETA: Your snark towards me is sorely misplaced. If you've read any of my posts in the entire time I've been here, I detest MAGA, Donald Trump, and the whole enchilada of whatever passes as (a) Republican these days.
I would bet if voters were presented platforms with no names or parties attached, elections would be quite a bit different and so would our lives.
For many voters, the election isn't about candidates' positions. For many voters, it's about how they "feel". They "feel" the economy is bad, or they "feel" a candidate cares about people like them, or they "feel" like a candidate is a strong leader.I wonder if there was a test to be able to vote, to ensure people read the candidates positions, what percentage of Americans would be allowed to vote.
"You, like MAGA, can choose to believe whatever you like" - is unambiguously snarky and there's no need to spin it otherwise. Let's just forget about it and move on. Also, I did tag my last sentence in that original post with "(/s)" for sarcasm.I’m not sure there is a way to determine who each searcher voted for. In fact I’m almost certain there isn’t. You have to make some inferences. For example, Why would a Kamala Harris voter search that? Also, when, during the same time frame, the phrase “how do tariffs work” is searched… those both spiked hard the night of the election and continued during the days following.
There was no snark intended. Really. Though I can see how you’d think so.
Lololololol
Lololololol
And lets watch the mass deportation Facts versus the Hollywood production we will "see 'Something something marketing, something something racism something something out of touch something something 2016 studies something something reread my post something something