- Messages
- 290
Kelly Loeffler is a great choice to head the SBA.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Because nothing says "I will champion small business" like marrying the billionaire CEO of a huge company and then spending her whole career in that huge company. She first was hired in "investor relations" and then the CEO of a subsidiary (note: most small businesses do not have subsidiaries).Kelly Loeffler is a great choice to head the SBA.
Like?Shocked. Is there one (or more) Trump appointment you like or at least think is competent to do the job?
Honestly, I don't really know what the SBA does so I don't care. I was just responding to this notion that Loeffler is a good person for it. Typically, the SBA administrators have experience with small businesses. That includes, by the way, Trump's first SBA head, Linda McMahon, who as far as I know was a perfectly competent SBA administrator.Shocked. Is there one (or more) Trump appointment you like or at least think is competent to do the job?
If you expect there to be any aspect of "service" in this government as it's traditionally understood than I think you are going to be sorely disappointed.Sacks is a grade A egomaniac and asshole. I hope he finds government service humbling and painful.
I think it’s good to have talented, successful businessmen and women in the cabinet.
Except, as someone else already pointed out, in Loeffler's case "successful" needs some clarification. Loeffler's "success" came after she married a billionaire businessman and then spent her entire "successful career" working in said husband's business empire. I mean, if you want to call that successful then by all means go ahead, but don't pretend that she worked herself up the hard way - she basically managed several of her husband's business subsidiaries. Maybe she would have gotten there on her own, maybe she wouldn't.I think it’s good to have talented, successful businessmen and women in the cabinet.
Given UNC's historic reputation as a liberal university I would imagine that it won't be good. I was wondering which one of Trump's appointees would fire the first shot of what will almost certainly be a major government effort to move (or just force) America's public and private universities in a rightward direction, much as Orban did in Hungary. As a private university it will be harder to go after dook, although withholding NIH grants would certainly hurt even them, although likely not to the extent it would at UNC.So I'm wondering what impact the NIH director will have for dook** and UNC who receive hundreds of millions of dollars in NIH research grants...
'Cancel culture' colleges could soon see money targeted by Trump's NIH pick: report
President-elect Donald Trump’s choice to lead the National Institute of Health is ready to settle a score – and he’s revving up a fight against campus culture at elite universities, according to a new report.And that could mean Stanford professor and economist Dr. Jay Bhattacharya uses the power...www.rawstory.com
Courts won't let him do that. Not even SCOTUS. It's not the job of the NIH to police university culture. Congress did not give it the authority to make determinations about research funding based on those types of considerations.Given UNC's historic reputation as a liberal university I would imagine that it won't be good. I was wondering which one of Trump's appointees would fire the first shot of what will almost certainly be a major government effort to move (or just force) America's public and private universities in a rightward direction, much as Orban did in Hungary. As a private university it will be harder to go after dook, although withholding NIH grants would certainly hurt even them, although likely not to the extent it would at UNC.
I wish I could believe in your confidence that the courts under the Trump administration will protect us from the control of the billionaire oligarchs and all efforts that Trump and his minions will seek to exercise in the establishment of an autocratic/fascist state.Courts won't let him do that. Not even SCOTUS. It's not the job of the NIH to police university culture. Congress did not give it the authority to make determinations about research funding based on those types of considerations.
How? Those comments are predictive, not statements of prior fact. And Patel is about as public a figure as you can get right now. Any lawsuit would be pure — oh what’s that word??? — lawfare.Depending on the exact quote, that does sound defamatory.
Olivia Troye said on MSNBC this week that Patel would “lie about intelligence” and “lie about making things up on operations” if confirmed by the Senate. According to NewsNation partner The Hill, Troye said Patel would “put the lives of Navy SEALs at risk” as the director of the FBI.