lawtig02
Iconic Member
- Messages
- 2,066
And balls deep in a woman who was not his wife.Yeah, the analogy doesn’t make any sense. But there is a good chance he was drunk when he said it.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
And balls deep in a woman who was not his wife.Yeah, the analogy doesn’t make any sense. But there is a good chance he was drunk when he said it.
They swear no such oath.Also @rodoheel
Yes, I would say that. I would be absolutely shocked if a former member of the military would use the military on the people they've sworn to protect regardless of who requested it.
Really? Even when that "former member of the military" is a sycophant and devotee of a man who routinely says that his political opponents inside this country are a bigger enemy than the autocrats and dictators who control our geopolitical foes?
Really? Even when that "former member of the military" is a sycophant and devotee of a man who routinely says that his political opponents inside this country are a bigger enemy than the autocrats and dictators who control our geopolitical foes?
When you put people in government who believe stuff like that - and many of the members of the military also believe it - you get the conditions that can create things like this:
Kent State shootings - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
We talking about "Wild" Bill Clinton?And balls deep in a woman who was not his wife.
Yeah, I have zero interest in defending Bill Clinton. I'm very glad he's had no power over our government in the last quarter century.We talking about "Wild" Bill Clinton?
Really? Not knowing his current mental state, I'd take "balls deep bill" over Trump or Harris.Yeah, I have zero interest in defending Bill Clinton. I'm very glad he's had no power over our government in the last quarter century.
CSPAN is "lefty media"?Are you prohibited from posting anything but gotcha comments propagated by lefty media? I have watched 90% of the hearing to this point and this is what is chosen to be posted? While not shocked by this, just wondering if the intent is to inform or feed the rabid echo chamber here? Good news, a lot more coming from kirsten gillibrand and elizabeth warren.