Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
If true, this really sucks to read.
Of course, it's no coincidence that Vance picked out Greta. Female, young, autistic -- perfect target for the party of punching down. And the word "scolding." Yep, checks out.Props to Greta for getting in JD’s head to the point he compared her to the world’s richest (and maybe most powerful) man, though.
So hard to even process that this is what's happening. Truly surreal.I mean, Vance just went to Europe and told Europeans they, not authoritarians in Russia and China, are the problem and they shouldn’t fear fascism, they should work with fascists and quit being so pissy about foreign government officials from Russia and the U.S. interfering with their elections.
The Trump Administration has gone on the world stage to declare that we are a Supervillain State, and so far everything they’ve done indicates an intention to carve up the world into spheres of domination among the United States (Western Hemisphere & Middle East), Russia (Europe) and China (the rest).
We had a chance, Pubs. Russia has never been weaker. China is facing enormous demographic and economic challenges. We could have led the world for the next 100 years. But you guys just couldn’t handle the thought of sharing a bathroom with a biological woman.I mean, Vance just went to Europe and told Europeans they, not authoritarians in Russia and China, are the problem and they shouldn’t fear fascism, they should work with fascists and quit being so pissy about foreign government officials from Russia and the U.S. interfering with their elections.
The Trump Administration has gone on the world stage to declare that we are a Supervillain State, and so far everything they’ve done indicates an intention to carve up the world into spheres of domination among the United States (Western Hemisphere & Middle East), Russia (Europe) and China (the rest).
“… The United States is rapidly being viewed as unreliable”
Not sure I've ever seen a more succinctly accurate statement in more than a decade on this board.We had a chance, Pubs. Russia has never been weaker. China is facing enormous demographic and economic challenges. We could have led the world for the next 100 years. But you guys just couldn’t handle the thought of sharing a bathroom with a biological woman.
If true, this really sucks to read.
Can you elaborate a bit on how cynicism is necessary for uncompromising pushback? I don’t see those as dependent on one another.It's true. We are the baddies.
The worst of us leveraged our humanistic and empathetic vulnerabilities to steer the world further towards class and racial systems of alignment. The folks at the top are more concerned with class, but they operate with simple cynicism directed towards the easily manipulated racial tribalists. IMO, combating this second rise of the Nazis will require a severe turn towards cynicism for those who believe in humanism, democracy, and pluralistic society. I recognize that’s a bit antithetical, but we’ve seen time and time again that you can only defeat reactionary bullies with uncompromising pushback.
The second part. Empathetic folk often overestimate the existence of empathy in the world, and particularly within their ideological antagonists. The rising tide trope is idealistic, and historically tenuous.Can you elaborate a bit on how cynicism is necessary for uncompromising pushback? I don’t see those as dependent on one another.
If what you’re saying is: liberals and socialists need to realize that, despite our inclinations towards humanism, most people are voting (or not voting) based on narrowly perceived self-interest, then I agree with that. But that doesn’t mean I myself need to turn to cynicism.
Go for it. I fully agree with that diagnosis @Healing.
This is incredibly accurate. Mobilize with like-minded people right now, while it's still easy to do. The usefulness of the right to general Americans is essentially nothing. I'm well past cynical.The second part. Empathetic folk often overestimate the existence of empathy in the world, and particularly within their ideological antagonists. The rising tide trope is idealistic, and historically tenuous.
The empathy gap is a durable characteristic and often far more powerful than a rising tide orientation. Basic in-group, outgroup stuff. I think we do ourselves a disservice if we view rising fascism as a phenomenon we need to convince people out of, because “we all want to do well”, vs realizing this is about mobilization of like-minded (or at least sympathetic) folks who haven’t meaningfully engaged in the political process.
You're not wrong about this, but we should be able to talk about things like:Go for it. I fully agree with that diagnosis @Healing.
I think this dynamic has manifested itself well in the USAID crisis. People of our persuasion can see the obvious good that foreign aid does. Unfortunately, foreign aid remains one the top things Americans would like to see cut.
Instead of trying to convince people out of this, we need to focus on the core issues we can mobilize people on: education, healthcare, pocketbook issues.
Setting ourselves up as the noble defenders of USAID is only strengthening the picture of Democrats as defenders of crumbling institutions and Republicans as anti-establishment populists.
True. There are some specific examples within USAID that make sense for Dems in terms of highlighting a message of: here is what government does for you, even if you don’t see it. I think connecting these threads for Americans is crucial.You're not wrong about this, but we should be able to talk about things like:
farmers losing crops because they were selling to USAID
the diplomats/USAID staffers in Congo who had to flee, leave all their belongings, and pay their own way home and have not received any reimbursement and don't know if they even had jobs.
You are right that going to bat for USAID itself is probably not a political winner. On the other hand, I don't think anyone really cares. Sometimes you have to shore up the base too.
Talking about the Congo incident also reinforces the impression that Trump doesn't actually give a fuck about Americans. That conduct was way worse than Benghazi. To leave them out to dry like that is unconscionable, even if someone doesn't agree with their political program.True. There are some specific examples within USAID that make sense for Dems in terms of highlighting a message of: here is what government does for you, even if you don’t see it. I think connecting these threads for Americans is crucial.
I’m interested to see how Dems respond to attempts to dismantle DoE and Medicaid because I think the case is a lot easier to make there. With USAID, people can just say outrageous things about Serbian DEI initiatives or gay theater productions since the effects of USAID aren’t acutely felt in the daily lives of *most* Americans.