UNC Football Catch-all | Bill Belichick Era underway

  • Thread starter Thread starter SnoopRob
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies: 2K
  • Views: 66K
  • UNC Sports 
What does a GM in college really do other than draw a large paycheck? Seems like another position that gives a highly paid staff even less to do. What good is an AD and all his/her staff? Reminds me of our local DOT they all stand around a job and takes turns at standing around.
 
I get heel79's point. It's odd that folks want BB and UNC to succeed, yet only focus on the negatives and (seemingly) ignore the positives. Not that it's wrong, or you're any less of a fan, just odd.
genuinely asking here because i just don't see them at this point - what are the positives? we suck in all phases on the field and we're a total mess off the field.
 
What does a GM in college really do other than draw a large paycheck? Seems like another position that gives a highly paid staff even less to do. What good is an AD and all his/her staff? Reminds me of our local DOT they all stand around a job and takes turns at standing around.
I'm not an expert in the field so I can't tell you the specific job duties. But now that a team has to manage roster building and construction with financial contracts and the portal, I think this has become a necessary position that wasn't needed in the past. I think all the top teams have GMs now so it's not like UNC is just making up an unnecessary job.
 
please tell me you're mocking someone with this, lol.
Also, no more booger eaters leading the school! We finally have a leader in Chancellor Roberts who understands what’s most important about a university: the revenue sports. Time to stop wasting money on nerdy professors and woke classes, and bring in the big guns to run our revenue sports programs! No more wasting time worrying about stupid things like academic reputation! Let’s make the alumni want to open up their wallets and support big time college sports! MUNCGA!
 
What does a GM in college really do other than draw a large paycheck? Seems like another position that gives a highly paid staff even less to do. What good is an AD and all his/her staff? Reminds me of our local DOT they all stand around a job and takes turns at standing around.
I do think people see the GM title applied to college programs and sometimes get the wrong idea about how it works.

In most cases, colleges have just beefed up their support staffs to handle all of the extra work and logistics that comes with roster management now that NIL and new transfer rules have made that aspect of major college football and basketball more complicated. They might have a “GM” that heads up that part of the staff, but for the most part the head coaches are still clearly in charge of building the rosters. This compared to pro sports where you have a bifurcated system where the GM/personnel staff and coaching staff are two separate departments.

UNC is kind of unique in that we have GMs for both sports that seem to trend more towards the professional model compared to most colleges. Hardly anyone knows off the top of their head who the “GM” is for Georgia, Bama, OSU, etc. but (unfortunately) most casual fans know who Mike Lombardi is.
 
I'm not an expert in the field so I can't tell you the specific job duties. But now that a team has to manage roster building and construction with financial contracts and the portal, I think this has become a necessary position that wasn't needed in the past. I think all the top teams have GMs now so it's not like UNC is just making up an unnecessary job.
I realize most have one, but contracts are handled by legal department. Roster building and portal, well, I don't know how schools survived beforehand.
 
Also, no more booger eaters leading the school! We finally have a leader in Chancellor Roberts who understands what’s most important about a university: the revenue sports. Time to stop wasting money on nerdy professors and woke classes, and bring in the big guns to run our revenue sports programs! No more wasting time worrying about stupid things like academic reputation! Let’s make the alumni want to open up their wallets and support big time college sports! MUNCGA!
Happy New Year Smiling GIF
 
genuinely asking here because i just don't see them at this point - what are the positives? we suck in all phases on the field and we're a total mess off the field.
Recruiting is good. And we have money for the NIL. Both are very important. Also have some young talented QBs.
 
This class was in danger of being a dud. Not sure we have ever had. 11 4 stars. And of course
He’s basically recruiting exactly where UNC recruits when they hire a new coach.
Buntings class was ranked 18th, Butch 12th, Fedora 28th, Mack 14th. Mack had 10 4/5 stars and Butch had 13. Both had significantly less total recruits than the clown duo of Lombardi/BB.
It’s a nice class. It’s nothing special to BB and somewhat disappointing given the money and resources pissed away on these guys.
 
This class was in danger of being a dud. Not sure we have ever had. 11 4 stars. And of course
We've also never had a class with 37 commits.
2020 had 9 4 stars and 1 5 star in a class of 28. 2021 had 12 4 stars and 1 5 star in a class of 24. 2022 had 8 4 stars and 2 5 stars in a class of 2026.
Recruiting has been fine so far but nothing eye popping.
 
lol right, I keep wondering what the heck people are seeing who keep touting our amazing recruiting. We’re recruiting quite literally the exact same as we always do under every other coach. The difference now is, when the rest of major college football has figured out that being so heavily reliant on building a program around freshmen classes is not the way to do things anymore, we are apparently leaning the exact opposite way and going all in on trying to build with 40 person freshman classes now.
 
I think that folks want UNC to succeed, I don't know that a lot of us are really concerned with Belichick's success except that, for the moment, it is tied directly to UNC's success.

And once someone comes to the conclusion that Belichick isn't likely to help UNC succeed, then it makes sense that those folks would want Belichick's time at UNC to end as soon as possible and would welcome news that suggests that might happen sooner rather than later.
Oh, I completely agree with you. For me, I feel like they're in the position you and I (and others) were last year about half-way through the basketball season. It became clear to us that HD was not right for the position. We pointed that out, we posted articles and podcasts that pointed that out, and so on. However, we also cheered when HD/staff had successes - we didn't only focus on the negatives, because above all we wanted UNC to improve and win and were delighted when they showed signs of that.

What I'm saying is it's odd to me, at least, how some folks here will only post negatives, while also say that they want UNC's football team/program to improve this year. It's clear that the traffic on this thread is highly correlated to the level of shit-show we see on the field.

I will fully admit that, as an odd person, I do on occasion misread situations. To me, the read of the thread is that many folks would prefer UNC gets humiliated until BB is fired. That is fine if that's your stance. But then, you really don't want to see them succeed with him as the coach.

Just my opinion, and I'll get off my soapbox now.
 
lol right, I keep wondering what the heck people are seeing who keep touting our amazing recruiting. We’re recruiting quite literally the exact same as we always do under every other coach. The difference now is, when the rest of major college football has figured out that being so heavily reliant on building a program around freshmen classes is not the way to do things anymore, we are apparently leaning the exact opposite way and going all in on trying to build with 40 person freshman classes now.
You might be surprised by transfer class size of top football schools. Alabama, Texas, Ohio State, Oregon, Penn St and Notre Dame had 12 or fewer 2025 incoming transfers. They are still centered on building their team through high school recruiting.
 
genuinely asking here because i just don't see them at this point - what are the positives? we suck in all phases on the field and we're a total mess off the field.
I think the team has shown improvement, from where they started until now. I think the staff is putting together a good (for UNC) recruiting class. I think I want to see a lot more improvement as the season goes on, otherwise I'll be in the "fire him" camp.
 
Back
Top