UNC ONLY BASKETBALL 2024-25 SEASON

  • Thread starter Thread starter nycfan
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies: 2K
  • Views: 36K
  • UNC Sports 
One of the best memories for this game will be Wolpfackers yelling, “Goal-tending,” about that last shot JWash rejected (at best that shot was hitting the underside of the rim).
 
Heelsandeers said:
You know where I stand on this already. Elliot's minutes should decrease but he should be starting for now. Seth is a known commodity off the bench

Elliot hasn't played his best and if I'm Hubert my goal is to get him playing to the potential we've sometimes seen (albeit much earlier in the season). I don't think bringing him off the bench is the way to achieve that

Starting doesn't mean more minutes as we saw the other night and even at times last season. It just means starting. There are plenty of minutes off the bench and a ton will be determined by matchups, who's playing well, foul trouble, etc.



Seth knew what he signed up for. Ian was one of those freshman and RJ and Elliot were returning starters. If Seth is back to playing like he was pre-injury and Elliot continues to struggle Seth will play more
Click to expand...
Maybe RJ needs to sit and come off the bench
 
its a flawed average team thx to HD. we do have some talent and will win a bunch of games in the acc because 3/4th of the teams absolutely suck.
 
Peppers49 said:
Never mind that Styles took a million steps and didn’t get called for it on the inbound that started that final possession lol.
Click to expand...
You can take as many steps as you want, but you must keep one foot within the 3-foot throw in area (designated spot). Styles moved outside the area, and it should have been an inbounds violation.
 
Last edited:
Drake defensively is really something. Joined RJ and Ian in needing 30+ every night

Elliot settled a team that otherwise came out playing frantically. He controlled the entire first half

Happy for Jwash. 3 straight with some of the best defensive effort of his career. Maybe this is what coaches thought the team had in November? People will remember the dunk and block but the assist to Ian at 2:00 with the team down 1 was huge
 
Seth doesn’t look anything like g like himself yet. Tentative out there and maybe half a step slow. Do we know whether he had another concussion or was it a different “upper body” injury?

I’m just worried about the young man if he is playing but still not 100% recovered from a concussion…
 
nycfan said:
Seth doesn’t look anything like g like himself yet. Tentative out there and maybe half a step slow. Do we know whether he had another concussion or was it a different “upper body” injury?

I’m just worried about the young man if he is playing but still not 100% recovered from a concussion…
Click to expand...
Edit: Trimble confirmed concussion.
 
Last edited:
BillOfRights said:
You can take as many steps as you want, but you must keep one foot within the 3-foot throw in area (designated spot). Styles moved outside the area, and it should have been an inbounds violation.
Click to expand...
Huh? I always thought the rule was that you could only take as many steps as you wanted after a made basket, on the baseline. But for any other inbounds, you had to keep one pivot foot planted.
 
duluoz said:
Huh? I always thought the rule was that you could only take as many steps as you wanted after a made basket, on the baseline. But for any other inbounds, you had to keep one pivot foot planted.
Click to expand...
Technically it was after a made basket, but didn’t State take a TO then?
After the TO, it becomes a spot throw in… or not?
If it doesn’t, then the State player could run the baseline for the throw in, thus no violation.
I didn’t notice if he stepped out of the 3 ft area
 
Centerpiece said:
Technically it was after a made basket, but didn’t State take a TO then?
After the TO, it becomes a spot throw in… or not?
If it doesn’t, then the State player could run the baseline for the throw in, thus no violation.
I didn’t notice if he stepped out of the 3 ft area
Click to expand...
No, ncsux inbounded the ball after the Washington dunk, advanced the ball over midcourt, THEN called timeout. Styles then inbounded from in front of the state bench and committed the (uncalled) inbounds violation by moving both feet outside the 3 ft area of the designated spot. If the timeout had been called after the made basket, ncsux could still run the baseline.

ETA: game replay ESPN United Kingdom - Serving Sports Fans. Anytime. Anywhere. via @ESPN App http://espn.com/app

1:21:15
 
Centerpiece said:
Technically it was after a made basket, but didn’t State take a TO then?
After the TO, it becomes a spot throw in… or not?
If it doesn’t, then the State player could run the baseline for the throw in, thus no violation.
I didn’t notice if he stepped out of the 3 ft area
Click to expand...
After a TO following a made basket, the in-bounding player can still run the endline.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top