That’s what I’m hoping too.I haven't seen any for him or Morrow. Hope that's a good thing.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That’s what I’m hoping too.I haven't seen any for him or Morrow. Hope that's a good thing.
the money IV was turned off.I haven’t seen an ad for Robinson in awhile. Considering how close we are to Election Day I would say forever. I don’t stayed glued to the TV, but with it being early October you don’t have to watch long to see an ad for a candidate in an important race. I’m seeing plenty of Stein ads. It would appear the GOP has pulled the plug on his campaign.
Brings up a good point. The Dem's cash advantage (for the Harris campaign at a minimum) is a bit neutered since there's only so much airtime available to buy up and much of it has been reserved in advance. With Robinson ads off the air, I wonder if there is more and cheaper (relatively speaking) air time available in NC for Harris and downballot Dems.Robinson doesn’t have any money to run ads. And the GOP Governors PAC pulled their support and ads.
26 seats to decide control of the House
Yeah, but most of those aforementioned voters know about as much about how the House works as they do virology. Steadily removing civics and economics from core public ed curriculum certainly wasn't an accident.I love how dysfunctional the House has been, with their inability to get anything done and all the internal knife fights on the GOP side, and the voters are like "You know what, I want some more of that...."
I think they mean he carried that triangleDid I miss Biden carrying Texas?
Ah gotcha, that makes sense. Just for context, Trump beat Biden by about 600K votes in 2020 in Texas, so 1M new registrations in those areas is significant.I think they mean he carried that triangle
Before changing his registration in July, Rogers apparently listed his brother's address as his own, though locals suggested they never saw him and he never lived there.Rogers, the Republican nominee for U.S. Senate, changed his voter registration on July 2 to a home in White Lake Township that is under construction. A month later, he used the White Lake address to vote (presumably, for himself) in the four-way race for the GOP nomination to replace retiring U.S. Sen. Debbie Stabenow. There’s just one problem: The house did not — and still does not — have a certificate of occupancy. That means Rogers could not live there legally. And if he didn’t live there, he may have broken the law by using that address to vote.
Ron DeSantis’ Administration Is Threatening to Prosecute the Media for Airing Pro-Choice Ads
Ron DeSantis’ Administration Is Threatening to Prosecute the Media for Airing Pro-Choice Ads
There is a perverse irony here.slate.com
“…
DeSantis and his allies are already spending large sums of taxpayer dollars to fight Amendment 4, which would enshrine abortion rights in the state constitution if voted into law in November. His “election police” have interrogated and intimidatedresidents who signed petitions to put it on the ballot. His administration created a publicly funded, state-run website condemning the amendment, and has run ads promoting the current law, which bans abortions after six weeks.
Now, however, DeSantis is escalating the battle: On Oct. 3, his Department of Health sent a letter to at least one local NBC affiliate suggesting that prosecutors could bring criminal charges against the TV station for airing ads that encourage residents to vote for the amendment. The letter, first reported by investigative journalist Jason Garcia, asserted that the ads violate Florida’s “sanitary nuisance” law and that stations may commit a second-degree misdemeanor by carrying them, subjecting their employees to a 60-day jail sentence.
… The Florida Department of Health claimed that airing the “Caroline” ad may violate the state’s ban on a “nuisance injurious to health,” a second-degree misdemeanor. (Yes, the department’s lawyers asserted that this law—which targets septic tanks and slaughterhouses—could somehow be applied to political speech.) The agency alleged that the advertisement may convince women that they cannot obtain emergency abortions in Florida, leading them to travel out of state for care or forgo it altogether.
Yet women are already taking these steps—not because they saw “Caroline” on TV, but because the six-week ban forces them to do so. The DeSantis administration is therefore blaming the catastrophic public health consequences of its own abortion ban on an ad asking voters to overturn that ban. …”
DeSantis becomes more like his hero and role model Viktor Orban every day. First take over education in the state and move the curriculum very sharply to the right, then go after the media and bully them into only broadcasting the news you want them to.Ron DeSantis’ Administration Is Threatening to Prosecute the Media for Airing Pro-Choice Ads
Ron DeSantis’ Administration Is Threatening to Prosecute the Media for Airing Pro-Choice Ads
There is a perverse irony here.slate.com
“…
DeSantis and his allies are already spending large sums of taxpayer dollars to fight Amendment 4, which would enshrine abortion rights in the state constitution if voted into law in November. His “election police” have interrogated and intimidatedresidents who signed petitions to put it on the ballot. His administration created a publicly funded, state-run website condemning the amendment, and has run ads promoting the current law, which bans abortions after six weeks.
Now, however, DeSantis is escalating the battle: On Oct. 3, his Department of Health sent a letter to at least one local NBC affiliate suggesting that prosecutors could bring criminal charges against the TV station for airing ads that encourage residents to vote for the amendment. The letter, first reported by investigative journalist Jason Garcia, asserted that the ads violate Florida’s “sanitary nuisance” law and that stations may commit a second-degree misdemeanor by carrying them, subjecting their employees to a 60-day jail sentence.
… The Florida Department of Health claimed that airing the “Caroline” ad may violate the state’s ban on a “nuisance injurious to health,” a second-degree misdemeanor. (Yes, the department’s lawyers asserted that this law—which targets septic tanks and slaughterhouses—could somehow be applied to political speech.) The agency alleged that the advertisement may convince women that they cannot obtain emergency abortions in Florida, leading them to travel out of state for care or forgo it altogether.
Yet women are already taking these steps—not because they saw “Caroline” on TV, but because the six-week ban forces them to do so. The DeSantis administration is therefore blaming the catastrophic public health Dconsequences of its own abortion ban on an ad asking voters to overturn that ban. …”