- Messages
- 1,419
Makes sense given the committee gave one to Obama for simply being a black man (partial). Bar pretty low for Dem Presidents.I nominated Joe Biden for showing us the peaceful transfer of power is still possible.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Makes sense given the committee gave one to Obama for simply being a black man (partial). Bar pretty low for Dem Presidents.I nominated Joe Biden for showing us the peaceful transfer of power is still possible.
Yea that ACA was a nothing burgerMakes sense given the committee gave one to Obama for simply being a black man (partial). Bar pretty low for Dem Presidents.
I definitely understand why Pubs would consider the peaceful transfer of power a low bar. And yet …Makes sense given the committee gave one to Obama for simply being a black man (partial). Bar pretty low for Dem Presidents.
Lips. She has two lips."The way THEY move?" Is Leavitt actually two people? Although he did mention her brain, it's pretty obvious from that statement what Trump values in the women who work for him, and it's not intelligence.
Not only did the committee fuck up by giving it to a guy just for being black but he isn’t even that black!!!!Makes sense given the committee gave one to Obama for simply being a black man (partial). Bar pretty low for Dem Presidents.
What does ACA have to do with an international peace prize? In any event, he won it in 2009. What had Obama accomplished in his first few months of his Presidency which merited a Peace Prize? My point is Trump has accomplished a lot more and deserves the prize.Yea that ACA was a nothing burger
He was nominated for what the world hoped he would do-that is trueWhat does ACA have to do with an international peace prize? In any event, he won it in 2009. What had Obama accomplished in his first few months of his Presidency which merited a Peace Prize? My point is Trump has accomplished a lot more and deserves the prize.
It was definitely an anti-Iraq War award.He was nominated for what the world hoped he would do-that is true
He had inherited the Great Recession and a Nation gone wild with war-against anybody but the Saudis that manned all the 9/11 planes. It was as if the world was finally breathing again after another massive republican cluster duck of an administration
“…The Trump administration still values the U.S.-India partnership, officials say. But ties between Washington and New Delhi have steadily soured over disputes about trade, Russia and whether Trump deserves credit for brokering a cease-fire following a four-day conflict in May between India and its rival Pakistan.
… Trump, current and former officials said, is deeply frustrated by the lack of progress with New Delhi.
A point of contention in tariff negotiations is the U.S.’s push to open India’s agricultural markets, which employs over 40% of the country’s workforce.
Opening up the sector, which has long been protected by New Delhi, would anger India’s farmers, a powerful voting bloc. That presents a perilous political risk for Modi, who abandoned an effort in 2021 to deregulate the agricultural sector after facing nationwide protests from farmers.
…Trump posted on social media that his team brokered a deal that led to a cease-fire on May 10. Pakistan embraced the announcement, praising Trump and nominating him for the Nobel Peace Prize.
India, by contrast, bristled at Trump’s assertions and insisted no outside power dictated the cease-fire. India’s insistence that the U.S. role was overblown has privately angered Trump, who has told aides he’s upset with Modi for not thanking him.
…Trump strained ties even further by offering to mediate the longstanding Kashmir dispute between India and Pakistan.
“That was embarrassing for India. India has always rejected the idea of third-party mediation, something that Pakistan has always sought,” said Lisa Curtis, a former senior National Security Council official who oversaw South Asia policy in Trump’s first term.
“If there had just been one or two tweets on May 10, the two sides could have recovered from it. However, Trump has talked multiple times about the U.S. bringing about the cease-fire.”…”
As I've said before, Obama's Nobel Peace Prize was equal parts lobbying and wishcasting. He didn't deserve it, and he said as much.What does ACA have to do with an international peace prize? In any event, he won it in 2009. What had Obama accomplished in his first few months of his Presidency which merited a Peace Prize? My point is Trump has accomplished a lot more and deserves the prize.
When it comes to international diplomacy, Trump reminds me of something that Winston Churchill supposedly said (there's some debate over it) about Eisenhower's bumbling and pompous Secretary of State, John Foster Dulles, whom Churchill loathed: "He is the only bull I know who brings his own China shop with him." Trump is a walking disaster area when it comes to diplomacy. (For good measure, Churchill is also the person who supposedly said of Dulles that a conversation with him was "Dull, Duller, Dulles").... with friends like Trump ...
I think they were trying to nudge him in that direction. "Look, you are a man of peace! You're not a warmonger. You can't start wars if you've won the peace prize."I always had the feeling that it was just sort of a token gesture in appreciation of the fact that America had elected its first black president, given the legacy of slavery and Jim Crow, and was just sort of an "atta boy" to him and to our country.
I really think he was just the face of the putative end of the disastrous Iraq War.I don't think I've ever actually met anyone who thinks that Obama deserved the Nobel Peace Prize.
I always had the feeling that it was just sort of a token gesture in appreciation of the fact that America had elected its first black president, given the legacy of slavery and Jim Crow, and was just sort of an "atta boy" to him and to our country.
According to nobelprize.org...Makes sense given the committee gave one to Obama for simply being a black man (partial). Bar pretty low for Dem Presidents.