fuheel
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 56
I guess, but they are clearly income.Couldn't one argue tips are a gift?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I guess, but they are clearly income.Couldn't one argue tips are a gift?
You can argue anything. But they are expressly for service provided - even if not mandatory.Couldn't one argue tips are a gift?
Someone boo this poster for me. I'm too busy changing all of my $2000 fees to $500 fees with strongly suggested $1500 gratuity.I can't think of any valid reason to not tax tips. It's income. Income should be taxed. All income should be taxed. No shelters, no special treatment. I don't understand why we would do otherwise.
Why should someone making $1000 a week in tips (which isn't difficult at many restaurants) pay zero federal taxes?
LOL, correct. I'll just charge $65 for classes with a $400 suggested gratuity instead of my current $465. I'll also provide the course materials gratuitously to those who pay the gratuity.Someone boo this poster for me. I'm too busy changing all of my $2000 fees to $500 fees with strongly suggested $1500 gratuity.
At "great" restaurants, many of the servers make $100K. That's why they never leave. The bartenders make staggering amounts at truly great restaurants. Even servers at midrange restaurants make $50K if they are any good. Think of it this way...if you're working at a Ruth's Chris, you probably have 4-6 tables and turn them on average twice a night. Say 8 covers. The average check is probably $300. At 20%, that's $60 per table. That's $480 nightly and it doesn't even cover the truly crazy tippers who will leave a couple hundred bucks. Those folks make damned good money when they are good at it.Its dumb-but I get it she took the air out of trumps bs Now I would suggest there is a limit not taxed . If you work at a great restaurant surely you can make well over $50,000
I have a young friend who waits at the best restaraunt in Charleston Wva . I don't know what he makes but the owners are opening a new place-want him to run it-and he figures he will take a pay cut And yea its Charleston............At "great" restaurants, many of the servers make $100K. That's why they never leave. The bartenders make staggering amounts at truly great restaurants. Even servers at midrange restaurants make $50K if they are any good. Think of it this way...if you're working at a Ruth's Chris, you probably have 4-6 tables and turn them on average twice a night. Say 8 covers. The average check is probably $300. At 20%, that's $60 per table. That's $480 nightly and it doesn't even cover the truly crazy tippers who will leave a couple hundred bucks. Those folks make damned good money when they are good at it.
Big Ben?I know someone who bartends/serves at a middling "English Pub" sports bar in Charlotte. They typically make over $1000 on a football weekend between Saturday/Sunday morning EPL games, plus college and NFL football. Add Monday Night football, all the tournament soccer from this summer that packed the house, crowds for March Madness and other assorted sports on TV and they make a nice living working 4 days per week.
I’m not arguing….but, out of that $480, they likely tip out 10% to the bartender(s), 10% to the buses, something (5%?) to the kitchen, something to the host…..if the restaurant has a sommelier, that person is getting a cut of wine sales (of course, if the sommelier is good, the customers are SPENDING on wine).At "great" restaurants, many of the servers make $100K. That's why they never leave. The bartenders make staggering amounts at truly great restaurants. Even servers at midrange restaurants make $50K if they are any good. Think of it this way...if you're working at a Ruth's Chris, you probably have 4-6 tables and turn them on average twice a night. Say 8 covers. The average check is probably $300. At 20%, that's $60 per table. That's $480 nightly and it doesn't even cover the truly crazy tippers who will leave a couple hundred bucks. Those folks make damned good money when they are good at it.
Sir Edmund Halley's?Big Ben?
You're not wrong on the tip out stuff. I was trying to be conservative on the covers. We ate in the Wild Turkey Lounge at the Angus Barn last night. I didn't drink. Drew had 2 glasses of wine and we had one appetizer and 2 entrees. It was $165. We were there for slightly more than an hour and her tip was $40. She was also working 3 more 2 tops near us and an 8 top. I'd guess she easily made $800 last night...and $600 after tipping out.I’m not arguing….but, out of that $480, they likely tip out 10% to the bartender(s), 10% to the buses, something (5%?) to the kitchen, something to the host…..if the restaurant has a sommelier, that person is getting a cut of wine sales (of course, if the sommelier is good, the customers are SPENDING on wine).
They also likely do a lot more than 8 covers a night.
The tax code requires waits/bartenders to report 8% of sales as tip income. They’re also expected to report all of credit card tips minus the tip-outs to other staff.
The Tower of London?Sir Edmund Halley's?
I don't disagree with you in theory, but I would think that the majority of tipped workers don't earn enough to pay taxes on tips anyway- don't they make something ridiculous like $2.13 an hour or something?- so I feel like the Harris proposal is kind of a moot point (not to mention, some good old-fashioned election year political pandering in a swing state that has an inordinate number of tipped workers). And at least, IMO, Harris is proposing it differently than Trump: Trump's "no tax on tips" proposal is a poorly-veiled attempt to give hedge fund billionaires even more tax breaks, whereas Harris's proposal pertains strictly to workers in the hospitality and service industries. All Trump's proposal would accomplish is to increase the ability of hedge fund managers, private equity managers, and other ultra-wealthy people to change their compensation to "mostly tips" from profit sharing- in other words, more tax code abuse by and for the ultra-wealthy at the expense of the working class.You're not wrong on the tip out stuff. I was trying to be conservative on the covers. We ate in the Wild Turkey Lounge at the Angus Barn last night. I didn't drink. Drew had 2 glasses of wine and we had one appetizer and 2 entrees. It was $165. We were there for slightly more than an hour and her tip was $40. She was also working 3 more 2 tops near us and an 8 top. I'd guess she easily made $800 last night...and $600 after tipping out.
I definitely do not begrudge her that. I wouldn't have that job. But I also don't think a 25 year old pulling $600 a night in tips should pay no income tax. That's lunacy to me.
You wouldn’t pay much in federal income tax, but the 10% rate kicks in after $13k-ish standard deduction, so you would pay some.I don't disagree with you in theory, but I would think that the majority of tipped workers don't earn enough to pay taxes on tips anyway- don't they make something ridiculous like $2.13 an hour or something?- so I feel like the Harris proposal is kind of a moot point (not to mention, some good old-fashioned election year political pandering in a swing state that has an inordinate number of tipped workers). And at least, IMO, Harris is proposing it differently than Trump: Trump's "no tax on tips" proposal is a poorly-veiled attempt to give hedge fund billionaires even more tax breaks, whereas Harris's proposal pertains strictly to workers in the hospitality and service industries. All Trump's proposal would accomplish is to increase the ability of hedge fund managers, private equity managers, and other ultra-wealthy people to change their compensation to "mostly tips" from profit sharing- in other words, more tax code abuse by and for the ultra-wealthy at the expense of the working class.
That said, I don't really understand the Harris proposal's purpose (aside from, again, election year pandering): if what you're really aiming for is that you want to lower taxes on lower earners, why not lower taxes on *all* lower earners? Ultimately, it's moot because it's merely a rhetorical device that has little to no chance of ever passing a divided Congress anyway.
My wife and I spent a week and a half in Italy back in the spring and it was really neat eating at restaurants where the staff was paid living/thriving wages, where tips were not only not expected but generally not wanted, and where the final bill that you got at the end of the meal...was the actual final bill, etc.
I was there this past Saturday night.Sir Edmund Halley's?
I was there as well that evening. July 21, 2010. Based on the photos in my phone from that evening, I was there between 6:00 and 9:00 PM. So there’s a good chance we were both there at the same time.In re Sir Edmund Haley's: A dozen or so years ago, it closed. It later reopened, but on the day it closed, I wanted to be there. Unfortunately, for me, the "being there" part meant after work. By the time I got there and got up to the bar, all that was left in the entire house that was alcoholic were some cans of PBR. Somewhat of a sacrilege, but I (prematurely) toasted the closing of Sir Edmund Haley's with a can of PBR.