Again, you don't know what bosiding is. It's false equivalence. You're right that it's not relegated to one party, but it is relegated to the people who are having to defend the indefensible. An example of bosiding on the left: "sure, the Great Leap Forward starved 30 million people, but let's not forget that black people in capitalist America live in poverty." And while it was not ever expressed that way, it was a sadly common sentiment expressed post WWII (I mean generally about communist societies, not necessarily the one example). Or another: Sure, the Soviet Union has a gulag, but Eugene Debs was put in jail!
Nothing that I wrote bears any connection to bothsiding, for obvious reasons. Well, reasons that should be obvious to most people. You keep wanting to fight with me over the meaning of words, and it's a puzzling choice. I'm a published author. For long stretches of my life, I wrote for a living. I have a large working vocabulary. If I didn't understand the meaning of words, I wouldn't have gotten to where I did. Here's a tip: if you argue with me about semantics, law or philosophy, you will lose every single time. Maybe you'll get a Chaminade-UVa upset once in a blue moon, but almost always you will get blown out. That's not a knock on you, though you surely will interpret it that way. Different people have different skills, because of differences in genetic inheritance, childhood environment, professional choices, training and opportunity, etc. Find what you're good at. This ain't it.
