Hot Stove: UNC Basketball

  • Thread starter Thread starter UNCMSinLS
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies: 2K
  • Views: 31K
  • UNC Sports 
Calheel said:
Raw 3Pt% is really not a great stat for measuring shooters. Volume is very important, as is FT% and type of 3PT%. Leaky Black could hit a decent percentage of those open 3s, but he wasn't a good 3 PT shooter, same with Nance.

Dude was by far Cal's best player last year and sometimes could not handle load (see game in Smith Center last year). But he would be exactly what this team needs. Unfortunately, we likely can't afford his price tag -- even with the Lubin funds now in play.
Click to expand...
I agree with you about needing to factor in volume and role but Stojakovic wasn't much more efficient as a freshman in a role where he wasn't the highest usage player. I'm personally just not convinced he's actually a great shooter based on his college results - and plus I think he could be a defensive liability at the 3.
 
rodoheel said:
I dunno man. Whenever Veesaar is out (just resting, not even getting into injury possibility) I don't see anyone who is a significant threat to the interior of the opposing defense.
Click to expand...

It’s not like VAL was much of that either. They weren’t exactly running stuff to get him post touches

Dives off of pick and rolls is where he made a living. Wilson/Stevenson both should provide some of that

rodoheel said:
And Veesaar is very big and foul prone; I don't think it would be good to need him out there more than 25-28 mpg or so.
Click to expand...

Unless they somehow increase talent elsewhere, they absolutely do need Veesaar at 25-28mpg. That’s with or without VAL imo
 
Heelsandeers said:
Unless they somehow increase talent elsewhere, they absolutely do need Veesaar at 25-28mpg. That’s with or without VAL imo
Click to expand...
I agree. That's why I said you don't want him out there more than that.

I'm just not as confident that anyone else on the roster can really play the 5 and not get completely bullied, on both ends.
 
rodoheel said:
I dunno man. Whenever Veesaar is out (just resting, not even getting into injury possibility) I don't see anyone who is a significant threat to the interior of the opposing defense. And Veesaar is very big and foul prone; I don't think it would be good to need him out there more than 25-28 mpg or so.

I'd love to have another guard/wing too. But I think you're being a little too dismissive of where this would leave our post rotation.
Click to expand...
fair.

but veesaar/wilson/stevenson/high/brown is a SIGNIFICANT upgrade from washington/lubin/withers/brown.

i think high can give us a some decent minutes at the 5. hopefully he lived in the gym/weightroom/cafeteria during his little off year.
 
BluHevn said:
I need a chart to keep up with who's on the team now.
Click to expand...
as of today....
backcourt: trimble, evans, dixon, denis
wing: d. powell (probably nba), j. powell, need another body or two...
frontcourt: veesaar, wilson, stevenson, high, brown

we need a couple more players for sure.
 
4thgenheel said:
as of today....
backcourt: trimble, evans, dixon, denis
wing: d. powell (probably nba), j. powell, need another body or two...
frontcourt: veesaar, wilson, stevenson, high, brown

we need a couple more players for sure.
Click to expand...
Still don't have a real PG, either. Guess Hubert is going all in with combo guards. And definitely need another wing.
 


No idea if we have an interest or a shot but we recruited him once before …
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top