Hot Stove: UNC Basketball [Don’t divulge IC Premium Info Please]

In the portal and has been contacted by Carolina:



6'10", not a rim protector or rebounder, but 37% 3FG% this season, 34% 3FG% career.
Is HD going to be able to sell him on the idea of backing up Caleb?
 
At the 4? VAL nor JWash can play the 4.
Davidson at the 4 or 5. I don't care. Put those four players in the rotation and see what shakes out.
Lubin can move his feet and guard, and he shot 33% 3FG% at Vandy a year ago. Not saying he's a starter at 4, but could provide minutes. Davidson played the 5 at Nevada. Carolina could play 5 out at times.
Lubin is underappreciated. His block% in ACC games was higher than 7'2 Samet Yigitoglu from SMU, 7'1 Maxime Raynaud from Stanford, 7'0 Efton Reid from Wake, 6'11 Malique Ewin from FSU, and 6'9 Cooper Flagg from dook. Lubin plays big.
 
What 6-year period was worse: 1999-2004 or 2020-25? I do understand that as of the end of the 99-04 period, we had a great deal of optimism, and the benefit of hindsight allows us to see the subsequent years that were among the best in UNC basketball history, taking the sting off of the 99-04 period. But if you look purely at the results, which was worse?

1999-2004

1999:
24-10
3rd place ACC finish (out of 9 teams)
Final AP ranking: 13th
First round NCAAT exit
0-3 vs. Duke

2000:
22-14
4th place ACC finish (out of 9 teams)
Final AP ranking: Unranked
Final Four appearance (lost in semifinals)
0-2 vs. Duke

2001:
26-7
1st place ACC finish (out of 9 teams)
Final AP ranking: 6th
Second round NCAAT exit
1-2 vs. Duke

2002:
8-20
7th place ACC finish (out of 9 teams)
Final AP ranking: unranked
No NCAAT appearance
0-3 vs. Duke

2003:
19-16
7th place ACC finish (out of 9 teams)
Final AP ranking: Unranked
No NCAAT appearance
1-2 vs. Duke

2004:
19-11
5th place ACC finish (out of 9 teams)
Final AP ranking: 18th
Second round ACCT exit
0-2 vs Duke

Overall:
118-78
3x finishing in bottom half of ACC
3 seasons finishing unranked
6-4 in NCAAT
2x missing NCAAT
1x making it out of first weekend of NCAAT
1 Final Four Appearance
2-14 vs. Duke

2020-2025

2020:
14-19
13th place ACC finish (out of 15 teams; tied with 3 teams for 13th place)
Final AP ranking: unranked
No NCAAT appearance (there was no NCAAT this year due to COVID, but we would not have made it if there were)
0-2 vs. Duke

2021:
18-11
5th place ACC finish (out of 15 teams)
Final AP ranking: unranked
First round NCAAT exit
2-0 vs. Duke

2022:
29-10
2nd place ACC finish (out of 15 teams)
Final AP ranking: unranked
National Championship appearance
2-1 vs. Duke (and those 2 wins were the greatest wins vs. Duke in UNC history

2023:
20-13
7th place ACC finish (out of 15 teams)
Final AP ranking: unranked
No NCAAT appearance
0-2 vs. Duke

2024:
29-8
1st place ACC finish (out of 15 teams)
Final AP ranking: 7th
Sweet 16 exit in NCAAT
2-0 vs. Duke

2025:
23-14
4th place ACC finish (out of 18 teams; tied for 4th place with 3 teams)
Final AP ranking: unranked
First round NCAAT exit (after winning Firsr Four game)
0-3 bs. Duke

Overall:
133-75
1x finishing in bottom half of ACC
5 seasons finishing unranked
7-4 in NCAAT (not including First Four game)
2x missing NCAAT
2x making it out of first weekend of NCAAT
1 National Championship appearance
6-8 vs. Duke

Just looking at the results, I might go with 1999-04 as being slightly worse. 2020-25 has a better overall record, better NCAAT record, only 1 finish in the bottom half of the ACC vs. 3, and a better record vs. Duke. Comparing the worst seasons within each of those stretches, as bad as 2020 was, 2002 was worse. Comparing the seasons with the best NCAAT runs in each of those stretches, 2022 was better than 2000.
Nice analysis. My only comeback would be that you should be able to self correct mistakes in this transfer portal/ NIL age . This wasn’t available to us in the earlier eras.
 
This raises another question: Does anyone think the coaching staff already knows who's leaving and who's coming back?
I wouldn't think most of the players know yet if they're leaving or staying. Still early. It seems like Trimble and Lubin want to stay. End of season meetings still to come. I expect a lot of conversations between Coach Davis and Jim Tanner. Powell and Jackson have NBA options to explore, I assume Cadeau and Washington will be invited back but may explore options, and I have no clue about Tyson and Brown. Scholarship limit increases to 15, so 4 spots available even if everyone comes back, but I don't know who would want to just to be on the 3rd team.
 
For players/students who started with a school and stayed, I wonder how much loyalty, love of the school, and getting a degree plays a part in the decision. Is it all about the money and PT? I can only imagine how disruptive it would be to one's social life and studies to transfer, but maybe that's just me.
My hunch is that most top 100 recruits are likely focused on basketball as their main concern, so they’ll do what they need to do to try to ensure the best for their careers (overseas for JWash).

I could see a situation where he chooses to stay, but I’d be a bit surprised. I just don’t see him getting much PT next year unless things go terribly wrong in the portal for us and I would imagine he wants consistent time on the court. But, if he decides to stay, I’ll continue to cheer for him. 🤷🏼‍♂️
 
Nice analysis. My only comeback would be that you should be able to self correct mistakes in this transfer portal/ NIL age . This wasn’t available to us in the earlier eras.
The portal and NIL present greater challenges than those that existed 20+ years ago. I think it is now much harder to be consistently successful.
 
Last edited:
Davidson at the 4 or 5. I don't care. Put those four players in the rotation and see what shakes out.
Lubin can move his feet and guard, and he shot 33% 3FG% at Vandy a year ago. Not saying he's a starter at 4, but could provide minutes. Davidson played the 5 at Nevada. Carolina could play 5 out at times.
Lubin is underappreciated. His block% in ACC games was higher than 7'2 Samet Yigitoglu from SMU, 7'1 Maxime Raynaud from Stanford, 7'0 Efton Reid from Wake, 6'11 Malique Ewin from FSU, and 6'9 Cooper Flagg from dook. Lubin plays big.
I don't think Davidson can play the 5 in HD's offense, and I don't think HD would want him as his big given how this year went, he'd be fitting in at the 4. I don't think there's any way that VAL, or JWash, could play the 4 in HD's offense. Note, JWit hit 10 more threes this year than VAL took while at Vandy, is more comfortable creating his shot off the dribble, a better ball handler, just a better all-around stretch-4. Any lineup replacing JWit with VAL at the 4 would be a worse offensive situation than they had this year. HD needs a 4 whose skill-set is much closer to a 3 than to a 5 - basically an oversized wing, that can shoot (Manek and Ingram, compared to Garcia and Nance).

It will be interesting to see if HD can sell Davidson on coming here to backup Caleb - assuming he's not thinking of Caleb backing him up...if so, that would be a lot of money spent on a backup.
 
Have to agree...if it is indeed only about the money for 90% of the players then your campus, reputation, academics...none of the things that Carolina has long had going for it, matter.
I made a similar post elsewhere to this, but I think it's a key thing to realize in the portal era.

The 2 main points of (HS or portal) recruitment are 1) NIL money & 2) NBA Development. If you can't compete, at least as a base level, in those 2 areas then you aren't going to be competitve in recruiting.

But after that comes the "other stuff"...the campus, program history & traditions, academics, etc. And if you can compete well on the NIL/NBA development side, then these can be the reasons that recruits choose you over other programs that can also offer NIL/NBA development.

But while the money aspect is (somewhat) new, let's not pretend that a lot of recruits haven't been about the advantages of how programs will benefit them for a long time. UNC under Dean didn't get top recruits year after year because we have nice uniforms and a good business school. We got players because Dean had a history of putting players in the pros and winning championships. We got good players under Roy (albeit often a different type of player) because Roy made them better players and typically won championships.

NIL has certainly changed the game in terms of making $$$ a main consideration, but it hasn't changed how people operate. Provided we can get our NIL where it needs to be (and can do some work on the perceived NBA development piece), there's no reason UNC can't be at the top of college basketball in the NIL era.
 
I wouldn't think most of the players know yet if they're leaving or staying. Still early. It seems like Trimble and Lubin want to stay. End of season meetings still to come. I expect a lot of conversations between Coach Davis and Jim Tanner. Powell and Jackson have NBA options to explore, I assume Cadeau and Washington will be invited back but may explore options, and I have no clue about Tyson and Brown. Scholarship limit increases to 15, so 4 spots available even if everyone comes back, but I don't know who would want to just to be on the 3rd team.
I don't think most players "know" what they're doing, but I think most "think they know" what they're doing and have a strong lean at this point. But, for some, there's going to have to be a reality check before they really know what they're going to do.

For Ian & Drake, that's likely getting info from the NBA about where they stand for the upcoming draft. If they're expected to be solidly first round, then I'd imagine they have to take that seriously and go.

For others, I think they have to figure out what their options are if they were to enter the portal vs. staying at Carolina. I imagine that for many, their agents have some idea about that already, especially if they have an offer they like, but for others they're probably weighing an uncertain portal vs. a more known future at Carolina.

But I would guess that most players already have an idea what they're going to do and a preference as to what that will be.
 
I’d be happy to see these 2 back as role players.
I would be happy to see them starting next year.

I hope underused James Brown will return, but I worry that he will transfer to a school that has the vision to see the player he will be as a junior...
 
What 6-year period was worse: 1999-2004 or 2020-25? I do understand that as of the end of the 99-04 period, we had a great deal of optimism, and the benefit of hindsight allows us to see the subsequent years that were among the best in UNC basketball history, taking the sting off of the 99-04 period. But if you look purely at the results, which was worse?

1999-2004

1999:
24-10
3rd place ACC finish (out of 9 teams)
Final AP ranking: 13th
First round NCAAT exit
0-3 vs. Duke

2000:
22-14
4th place ACC finish (out of 9 teams)
Final AP ranking: Unranked
Final Four appearance (lost in semifinals)
0-2 vs. Duke

2001:
26-7
1st place ACC finish (out of 9 teams)
Final AP ranking: 6th
Second round NCAAT exit
1-2 vs. Duke

2002:
8-20
7th place ACC finish (out of 9 teams)
Final AP ranking: unranked
No NCAAT appearance
0-3 vs. Duke

2003:
19-16
7th place ACC finish (out of 9 teams)
Final AP ranking: Unranked
No NCAAT appearance
1-2 vs. Duke

2004:
19-11
5th place ACC finish (out of 9 teams)
Final AP ranking: 18th
Second round ACCT exit
0-2 vs Duke

Overall:
118-78
3x finishing in bottom half of ACC
3 seasons finishing unranked
6-4 in NCAAT
2x missing NCAAT
1x making it out of first weekend of NCAAT
1 Final Four Appearance
2-14 vs. Duke

2020-2025

2020:
14-19
13th place ACC finish (out of 15 teams; tied with 3 teams for 13th place)
Final AP ranking: unranked
No NCAAT appearance (there was no NCAAT this year due to COVID, but we would not have made it if there were)
0-2 vs. Duke

2021:
18-11
5th place ACC finish (out of 15 teams)
Final AP ranking: unranked
First round NCAAT exit
2-0 vs. Duke

2022:
29-10
2nd place ACC finish (out of 15 teams)
Final AP ranking: unranked
National Championship appearance
2-1 vs. Duke (and those 2 wins were the greatest wins vs. Duke in UNC history

2023:
20-13
7th place ACC finish (out of 15 teams)
Final AP ranking: unranked
No NCAAT appearance
0-2 vs. Duke

2024:
29-8
1st place ACC finish (out of 15 teams)
Final AP ranking: 7th
Sweet 16 exit in NCAAT
2-0 vs. Duke

2025:
23-14
4th place ACC finish (out of 18 teams; tied for 4th place with 3 teams)
Final AP ranking: unranked
First round NCAAT exit (after winning Firsr Four game)
0-3 bs. Duke

Overall:
133-75
1x finishing in bottom half of ACC
5 seasons finishing unranked
7-4 in NCAAT (not including First Four game)
2x missing NCAAT
2x making it out of first weekend of NCAAT
1 National Championship appearance
6-8 vs. Duke

Just looking at the results, I might go with 1999-04 as being slightly worse. 2020-25 has a better overall record, better NCAAT record, only 1 finish in the bottom half of the ACC vs. 3, and a better record vs. Duke. Comparing the worst seasons within each of those stretches, as bad as 2020 was, 2002 was worse. Comparing the seasons with the best NCAAT runs in each of those stretches, 2022 was better than 2000.
It's interesting to see it all written out like that. Before you laid out the data, I would have said that 2020-2025 was worse, but I don't think the numbers back that up. One thing that makes it hard to compare the 2 eras is that the ACC was much, much tougher in the first period and if you could transport teams between the two, I think the more recent Heels would struggle much more against the 1999-2004 ACC than they have the current one and the 1999-2004 would look a lot better (record-wise) against the recent ACC than they did back in their day.

The other big difference, though, is what you mentioned...at the end of the 2004 season we had a lot more reason for optimism than we seemingly have right now. Roy, one of the top coaches in CBB, had returned to Chapel Hill and we had a team we could be really excited about going into the next season. In 2025, we have a lot more unknowns and uncertainty and that make the future a lot more murky.

But from an achievement standpoint, these two periods are a little closer than I realized and the recent past may be a smidge better than the earlier period.
 
I would be happy to see them starting next year.

I hope underused James Brown will return, but I worry that he will transfer to a school that has the vision to see the player he will be as a junior...
if you want the Heels competing for a NT I think they need better than VAL and Seth starting unless the other 3 are stars.

Not many kids wait 3 years to get their shot anymore, but maybe Brown loves UNC.
 
Nice analysis. My only comeback would be that you should be able to self correct mistakes in this transfer portal/ NIL age . This wasn’t available to us in the earlier eras.
In earlier eras, there were usually freshmen and sophomores to step up when the seniors departed.

In the NIL age, it remains to be seen how well mistakes can be corrected. It is not clear that throwing together a roster of one- or two-year players is an effective team building strategy.
 
Back
Top