Good. Speaking for myself, I no longer see a story here, so to speak. It would be pretty damn arrogant of me to come down hard on you about what you should have done, when I wasn't there, when I've never been a newspaper editor and have barely set foot in a news room.
I don’t see anything wrong with what ‘79 did.
Doing what mom wanted in that case was absolutely the right thing to do. Damn what anyone else thinks.
www.robesonian.com
www.robesonian.com
I literally asked the HRC person whose wishes they thought I would honor, the mother who was grieving, or someone from HRC and that person said something like "me." They adopted a very threatening tone dealing with me quickly.
You did the right thing in this case based on everything said here. Seems to me to be the same issue we have now with the boxing controversy but in reverse....someone with so much intent to make an issue that they lose all scope of humanity.
Gender vs. Species.
It happened some years ago and I don't remember all the particulars, but I believe that heel79 ran an article he wrote in his paper in which he mentioned the IC ZZLP board as an example of liberal intolerance or some such. It became quite the topic of conversation on the old ZZLP for some time. I'm sure someone else could provide more details.
That is fair. I have written by my count about 6000 edits/columns and zzl took up a few paragraphs in one but someone shared and it caused a stir. His characterization is fair as well but zzl was not as I recall central to to column. Not an edit. I actually tried to find but could not. So awesome someone has recalled 5 year old post and now another from several years back. Kinda flattered.
A couple of photos from the Noah's Ark exhibit in Kentucky.
Is anyone else surprised they use depictions of dinosaurs based on paleontological research, a science, but ignore the fossil/carbon dating (also a science) which separates man and dinosaur by 65M years?
This just simply isn’t true no matter how many times conservatives make the claim.
You realize nobody here cares about how persecuted you feel, right? This isn’t a safe space to spout nonsense without a reaction or challenge. You won’t find vindication here.
So I have a question based on this post...does this mean that you believe a cursory examination of the makeup of a group of punished individuals says more about the motives of those doing the punishing than it does the actions of those who were punished?
I will take a stab. In think generally speaking bans are given more frequently to cons than liberals. It's less that the cons don't deserve as liberals get to slide. I also think, and it's not talked as much about, when liberals start garbage troll threads they are allowed but when cons start some threads portraying a leftie fav in bad light gets locked more quickly. That is my sincere answer.
