Callatoroy
Iconic Member
- Messages
- 2,492
I'm confused. Is this conservative Republican a lib or a media?
What wasteful spending / fraud has actually been verified? Is there any?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I'm confused. Is this conservative Republican a lib or a media?
Link?Likely Lincoln Project Republican (whom the media worships) with TDS. He’s conservative the way Nicole Wallace is conservative. Musk has shown TONS of fraud in that agency. 80/20 issue.
I'm sure there's some of that. There's always going to be a team aspect to politics. But I have my doubts that what she is describing in the deep backwoods where the KKK still has a relatively active presence is really representative of a large part pf the American electorate. I doubt it is enough to get him elected and then re-elected. I think there is a sizable portion of the people that elected him that either liked his policies or were disappointed in the Democrat's policies/candidates.This is old, but it fits on this thread. What follows is why I don’t care to engage with any republican or maga or conservative. They’re all assholes and trying to have a conversation with them is pointless, useless and fruitless.
“The question was posed, "Why do people continue supporting Trump no matter what he does?" A lady named Bev answered it this way:
“You all don't get it. I live in Trump country, in the Ozarks in southern Missouri, one of the last places where the KKK still has a relatively strong established presence.
They don't give a shit what he does. He's just something to rally around and hate liberals, that's it, period.
He absolutely realizes that and plays it up. They love it. He knows they love it.
The fact that people act like it's anything other than that proves to them that liberals are idiots, all the more reason for high fives all around.
If you keep getting caught up in "why do they not realize this problem" and "how can they still back Trump after this scandal," then you do not understand what the underlying motivating factor of his support is. It's fuck liberals, that's pretty much it.
Have you noticed he can do pretty much anything imaginable, and they'll explain some way that rationalizes it that makes zero logical sense?
Because they're not even keeping track of any coherent narrative, it's irrelevant. Fuck liberals is the only relevant thing.
Trust me; I know firsthand what I'm talking about.
That's why they just laugh at it all because you all don't even realize they truly don't give a fuck about whatever the conversation is about.
It's just a side mission story that doesn't matter anyway.
That's all just trivial details - the economy, health care, whatever.
Fuck liberals.
Look at the issue with not wearing the masks.
I can tell you what that's about. It's about exposing fear. They're playing chicken with nature, and whoever flinches just moved down their internal pecking order, one step closer to being a liberal.
You've got to understand the one core value that they hold above all others is hatred for what they consider weakness because that's what they believe strength is, hatred of weakness.
And I mean passionate, sadistic hatred.
And I'm not exaggerating. Believe me.
Sadistic, passionate hatred, and that's what proves they're strong, their passionate hatred for weakness.
Sometimes they will lump vulnerability in with weakness.
They do that because people tend to start humbling themselves when they're in some compromising or overwhelming circumstance, and to them, that's an obvious sign of weakness.
Kindness = weakness. Honesty = weakness.
Compromise = weakness.
They consider their very existence to be superior in every way to anyone who doesn't hate weakness as much as they do.
They consider liberals to be weak people that are inferior, almost a different species, and the fact that liberals are so weak is why they have to unite in large numbers, which they find disgusting, but it's that disgust that is a true expression of their natural superiority.
Go ahead and try to have a logical, rational conversation with them. Just keep in mind what I said here and be forewarned.”
Musk has shown zero fraud in that agency. He didn't even claim to have found any. They just closed it because it was helping people.Likely Lincoln Project Republican (whom the media worships) with TDS. He’s conservative the way Nicole Wallace is conservative. Musk has shown TONS of fraud in that agency. 80/20 issue.
He gets 75% of the way there just for having an R at the end of the name. Probably a little further. So did W and McCain, etc. the people I'm talking about are the persuadable middle. Obama won them. Joe won them. What happened to Kamala and Hillary and Kerry?It doesn't have to get him elected if it gets him 75% of the way without question. Then he has to win the gullible, the uneducated and the scammers. all while supported by the pretty little hate machine that is rightwing media and their lies.
What did 2004, 2016 and 2024 have in common? Oh yes, gay panics and race panics. Hmm.He gets 75% of the way they are just for having an R at the end of the name. Probably a little further. So did W and McCain, etc. the people I'm talking about are the persuadable middle. Obama won them. Joe won them. What happened to Kamala and Hillary and Kerry?
And had been losing ground since Pat Robertson, then Falwell.I am a former Republican. But the Tea Party--> alt-right -->Trump/MAGA --> Trump 2.0 = National Socialism are not conservatism, not in the Reagan/Buckley sense.
Whatever was bedrock conservatism died with John McCain.
True enough… and this same conversation could be on the other thread “What happened to American Conservatives?” I wasn’t sure on which thread to post. But this one works too…I am a former Republican. But the Tea Party--> alt-right -->Trump/MAGA --> Trump 2.0 = National Socialism are not conservatism, not in the Reagan/Buckley sense.
Whatever was bedrock conservatism died with John McCain.
Let’s remember that the hero to most American Conservatives, Ronald Reagan, was tied at the hip to Jerry Falwell, Pat Robertson, Phyllis Schlafly, etc.And had been losing ground since Pat Robertson, then Falwell.
Yeah. They thought he'd reverse the Justice Department's decision to deny federal funding to schools like Liberty, Bob Jones and a few other religious schools who still practiced segregation. Turns out he didn't, but both sides got a lot of mileage out of it. Once it died as a cause, they decided abortion was a sin and used that as the unifier for the Moral Majority types.Let’s remember that the hero to most American Conservatives, Ronald Reagan, was tied at the hip to Jerry Falwell, Pat Robertson, Phyllis Schlafly, etc.
Pat Buchanan as a candidate.And had been losing ground since Pat Robertson, then Falwell.
Reagan loved him some evangelicals. Goldwater pushed them away because he thought they were nuts and would take the party away from conservatism in the sense of a smaller government. He lost, but he was proven exactly right.And had been losing ground since Pat Robertson, then Falwell.
Yes, the political/cultural history of the 1970s in the south was the creation of a white identity in order to perpetuate the racism of the previous 150+ years plus under a thin veneer. It was never convincing to anyone but the gullible or the fellow travelers.Evangelicals generally stayed away from politics until the 70s.
This is most "leaderless" that I've seen Democrats since the 1980s, when they were blown out in three straight presidential elections and lost control of the Senate between 1981 and 1987. The difference is that then the Democrats at least controlled the House for that entire twelve-year period and were still competitive in most rural areas and in most states, including most of the South. I've come to the belief that Democrats are just shellshocked by Trump, and especially him winning a second time as a convicted felon, and they're still trying to figure out some way to respond. The reaction to his victory in 2016 was surprise but also anger and a lot of determination to resist. The reaction to his win last year, from what I saw on social media and in real life, was very different - a real sense of depression and head-shaking at what this country has become. I think Democrats generally, from top to bottom, are still trying to feel their way through a sick nation and decaying political system that has become something that many of them don't recognize anymore.Pat Buchanan as a candidate.
Robertson and Falwell were on the rim of Nixon's Southern Strategy. They seemed clownish and were not central to Reagan or 41 administration although they were paid lip service, including WH visits. Robertson was more dangerous and had some momentum.
Once a WH candidate, then POTUS, entered 1600 Pennsylvania Ave. who was only half-white, the Tea Party first flipped in Texas from a libertarian movement and mutated to the Orange Headed monster it's become. Trump is both Frankenstein's Monster and the Manchurian Candidate.
Getting through this dystopia day-by-day is all I/we can do. Grant, contracts, graduate students are in peril or have been lost.
I wish Harvard and all Universities and Law Firms in court fighting Trump the best of luck, fortune, and the law on their side. The best contract law attorneys on the planet are representing.
Dems need to get out of the shadows and be seen. Draw the wrath of Mango Duce. But have a plan and simply explain to the people why we are on the wrong path.