Iran Catch-All | IRAN WAR

  • Thread starter Thread starter nycfan
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies: 7K
  • Views: 214K
  • Politics 
You might want to go back and look at the limitations in that agreement. It would have expired by now. It was horrible and achieved nothing.
It did nothing and yet ten years after it was signed Iran had no nuclear weapon in spite of your and Israel's ilk bleating about how they are constantly weeks away from having one. So your cult leader bombs them and has you bleat some more about how their program was "obliterated" and wouldn't be able to produce a nuke for years, only to have several months pass before they are supposedly yet again weeks away from a nuke making going to war a necessity. I'm sure you were pushing the narrative of no new wars during the last election, yet here you are pushing another war that will fix a problem that you supposedly fixed several months ago that hadn't been a problem in the decade since the "horrible deal" was signed. You are a pox on our country and humanity and will believe anything you are told to believe.
 
Where are you pulling that doctrine from in the bible?
The Sixth Commandment and The Sermon on the Mount (Matthew 5:21-22):

“You have heard that it was said to the people long ago, ‘You shall not murder, and anyone who murders will be subject to judgment. But I tell you that anyone who is angry with a brother or sister will be subject to judgment. Again, anyone who says to a brother or sister, ‘Raca,’ is answerable to the court. And anyone who says, ‘You fool!’ will be in danger of the fire of hell.


Raca means basically "good-for-nothing."

Jesus didn't like killing, or even the mind-set that leads to anger that leads to killing.
 
What is he being dishonest about? That isn’t the same as saying he hasn’t made mistakes or the messaging has been clear, but where has he been dishonest?
Uh, didn't he claim six days ago that "we have won the war"? And now today we hear he is considering getting the hell out and not worry about getting the Gulf opened up. I don't know, but there's got to be some dishonesty there somewhere.

Now I remember why I posted that. If you remember the first month of Covid he was making all kinds of claims that it was nothing, that it wasn't going to go any further, and all kinds of crap. Its the same thing he's doing now.
 
It did nothing and yet ten years after it was signed Iran had no nuclear weapon in spite of your and Israel's ilk bleating about how they are constantly weeks away from having one. So your cult leader bombs them and has you bleat some more about how their program was "obliterated" and wouldn't be able to produce a nuke for years, only to have several months pass before they are supposedly yet again weeks away from a nuke making going to war a necessity. I'm sure you were pushing the narrative of no new wars during the last election, yet here you are pushing another war that will fix a problem that you supposedly fixed several months ago that hadn't been a problem in the decade since the "horrible deal" was signed. You are a pox on our country and humanity and will believe anything you are told to believe.
More to the point, and to Callatoroy’s prior commentary about NK and Pakistan, Trump and Israel have ensured that there is considerably more incentive for Iran to develop nuclear weapons. It is the rational decision.
 
More to the point, and to Callatoroy’s prior commentary about NK and Pakistan, Trump and Israel have ensured that there is considerably more incentive for Iran to develop nuclear weapons. It is the rational decision.
Not just Iran. Every nation on earth.
 
What is he being dishonest about? That isn’t the same as saying he hasn’t made mistakes or the messaging has been clear, but where has he been dishonest?
Dishonest about EVERYTHING.

Iran was not on the cusp of having nuclear weapons. They never have been. Full stop. That is the lie of all lies.

Every statement about our actions in Iran is a lie. Every timeline is a lie. Every motivation is a lie.

If the man is breathing, he is lying.

And you damned well know it.
 
I'm so amused at the shameless abject hypocrisy of the notion that the only country to ever actually use nuclear weapons on another country, and the only country besides Russia and Israel that seems to believe it is our God-granted birthright to repeatedly bomb and invade other countries when we don't like their leaders- has the gall to believe it has the moral authority to tell other countries that they can't pursue nuclear weapons themselves.
 
The Sixth Commandment and The Sermon on the Mount (Matthew 5:21-22):

“You have heard that it was said to the people long ago, ‘You shall not murder, and anyone who murders will be subject to judgment. But I tell you that anyone who is angry with a brother or sister will be subject to judgment. Again, anyone who says to a brother or sister, ‘Raca,’ is answerable to the court. And anyone who says, ‘You fool!’ will be in danger of the fire of hell.


Raca means basically "good-for-nothing."

Jesus didn't like killing, or even the mind-set that leads to anger that leads to killing.
Sixth commandment refers to "ratsach" aka "unlawful killing" aka murder -- it does not rule out killing for every reason.
And again in the Matthew verse you copied it refers specifically to murder not all killing no matter the reason.

Jesus seems ok giving this parable in Luke 19:27:
“But those enemies of mine who did not want me to be king over them—bring them here and kill them in front of me.”

And more directly, if someone believes in the trinity god of christianity they also believe Jesus is Yahweh who killed people left right and center. If you're going to quote the 10 commandments then one has to include the rest of the OT where yahweh slaughtered entire people groups.
 
Obama's Iran treaty had some provisions phase out in 2026, but most remained until 2031. The one phasing out in 2026 was the prohibition on centrifuge acquisition. Obviously the expiration of that wouldn't lead to a bomb -- it would simply allow Iran to start obtaining the equipment it would need if it wanted a nuclear program.

Gee, lying liars and lying again!
 
You might want to go back and look at the limitations in that agreement. It would have expired by now. It was horrible and achieved nothing.
A man who cannot understand timeouts or arithmetic is not likely to understand nuclear strategy or international diplomacy.

The agreement would not have expired and you have no idea what you are talking about, as usual.
 
Back
Top