You show the tradition in the very post I quoted...Nader in 2000, Stein in 2016, non-support in 2024. You laid out the tradition very well and I didn't need to add anything to it because you covered it well.
I wasn't being literal in that statement about State/Swofford and I know you didn't specifically blame the public. But every time these discussions come up there's always complaints from you that the left isn't given a real chance in American politics as if it is some kind of conspiracy against you. The reality is that the left makes claims that the public simply rejects. The only "conspiracy" here is that the ideas the left generates just don't motivate the public to support them at the ballot box.
The left isn’t often given a real chance in American politics but not because of any kind of conspiracy against the left. I’ve never claimed that there is a conspiracy against the left, though other leftists certainly have claimed that. Again, please just engage with what I’m saying rather than what you think I’m saying or what other leftists have said.
My thoughts about why the left doesn’t gain traction in America are much more structural than that. Besides, there have been times in American history when the left has gained traction. It’s no coincidence that the left was it its strongest in this country when labor was at its strongest.
Leftist ideas heavily influenced the New Deal. Last time I checked, the programs that are still around from that era are pretty damn popular with the American public.
It’s just not as simple as the left making claims and then the public rejecting them. That’s not how politics in this country works. That’s not really how politics works anywhere.
Look at opinion polls of issues that would be considered “left” issues. A ton of them garner a majority of public support. It’s not a conspiracy to say that operating within the current political and economic structure of the United States puts the left at a disadvantage. I’m sure you would acknowledge that it puts the Democratic Party at a disadvantage. That is magnified x100 for people left of the Democratic mainstream.
To simplify politics to the point of accepting or rejecting an entire program or worldview based on individual election results (especially in an electoral system as skewed as ours) is asinine. Is the entire platform of the Democratic Party now rejected by the American public since Harris lost?
The wider point, going back to the origin of this discussion, is that the left-wing in the United States is utterly broken and disorganized. Not as much as it was in its nadir, but it is not anywhere close to an effective political force. Bernie was the closest thing to hammering out some kind of consistent left program, but we all know of his failures. If there was a real left force in this country, we wouldn’t be talking about college protestors as representative of the left.