Yes, I know “day in court” is a popular figure of speech. But it is a particularly ironic one in the context of this case.
Election law, especially post-election challenges, is an incredibly unique area of the law. These challenges are litigated in a very fast time frame - typically just weeks.
Out of the 100,000+ elections in the United States last November, this is the only one that is still not finalized. Why? Because Griffin decided to drag this thing out (enabled by some bad faith actors along the way)
Do the other 100,000+ election losers (some of whom lost much closer elections) just not understand about their “day” in court or was there something very unique about Griffin?