lawtig02
Inconceivable Member
- Messages
- 4,141
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Might have gotten mixed up on who actually said it was "funny" but gtyellowjacket definitely made some comment about how it was no big deal, so I just find it to be curious that the Camp Auschwitz shirt would draw the word "odious" from him.Zen was the one who thought the KKK flyer was funny.
BAH! Just tourists taking pics and whatnot.I'm also LOVING that Ramrouser is supporting the J6 pardons. Not surprising, given who signs his paycheck, but that's a hill I'm more than happy for him to die on. Ramrouser is now firmly on the side not just of his paymaster, but also of this guy.
And this guy.
And these guys.
So congrats, Ramrouser, I guess? I have no idea how you're going to explain this to your kids and grandkids, but I hope they can find some way to not hold you in complete contempt.
Might have gotten mixed up on who actually said it was "funny" but gtyellowjacket definitely made some comment about how it was no big deal, so I just find it to be curious that the Camp Auschwitz shirt would draw the word "odious" from him.
I might if the last line was "Meet at the unattended backpack on the corner".Would you consider a “fake” al-Qaeda recruitment flyer to be funny, too?
I do not support a pardon for any violent rioter, particularly one who attacked a police officer. The rest didn't deserve their lengthy prison sentences. Same with the pro lifers peacefully protesting. Basically the JD Vance position.
This has to be top 5 of the worse things trump is doing. The party of law and order my ass. Guess these guys don't need to give unto Cesar, right @Ramrouser?I'm also LOVING that Ramrouser is supporting the J6 pardons. Not surprising, given who signs his paycheck, but that's a hill I'm more than happy for him to die on. Ramrouser is now firmly on the side not just of his paymaster, but also of this guy.
And this guy.
And these guys.
So congrats, Ramrouser, I guess? I have no idea how you're going to explain this to your kids and grandkids, but I hope they can find some way to not hold you in complete contempt.
For every video and picture you can post depicting violence that day, the other side can post videos and pictures showing people in the Capitol simply walking around between the rope lines. Or, officers welcoming them into the building. No picture, or group of pictures, paints a definitive picture of what occurred that day.BAH! Just tourists taking pics and whatnot.
Yes, it always comes down to not being as bad as the other guy, right?I do not support a pardon for any violent rioter, particularly one who attacked a police officer. The rest didn't deserve their lengthy prison sentences. Same with the pro lifers peacefully protesting. Basically the JD Vance position.
Trump got impatient a said "f***k it pardon them all." Criticizing that decision is fair but I wouldn't get too high on your horse given the pardons and commutations given out by Biden, Obama and Clinton.
Do you actually believe what you say when you say stupid shit like this?For every video and picture you can post depicting violence that day, the other side can post videos and pictures showing people in the Capitol simply walking around between the rope lines. Or, officers welcoming them into the building. No picture, or group of pictures, paints a definitive picture of what occurred that day.
There is literally nothing you wouldn't JCD. You're the Gerald Henderson of this message board.For every video and picture you can post depicting violence that day, the other side can post videos and pictures showing people in the Capitol simply walking around between the rope lines. Or, officers welcoming them into the building. No picture, or group of pictures, paints a definitive picture of what occurred that day.
Agree. There were both types, which is why generalizations don't work.For every video and picture you can post depicting violence that day, the other side can post videos and pictures showing people in the Capitol simply walking around between the rope lines. Or, officers welcoming them into the building. No picture, or group of pictures, paints a definitive picture of what occurred that day.
Wow, straight out of the fox news play book.For every video and picture you can post depicting violence that day, the other side can post videos and pictures showing people in the Capitol simply walking around between the rope lines. Or, officers welcoming them into the building. No picture, or group of pictures, paints a definitive picture of what occurred that day.
It's the worst thing so far. By far. And yet Ramrouser can't help but JCD it.This has to be top 5 of the worse things trump is doing. The party of law and order my ass. Guess these guys don't need to give unto Cesar, right @Ramrouser?
They love to lie about all of the hardened criminals crossing the border and stealing jobs, but celebrate convicted home grown maga criminals being released. Wow, there is no bottom to reach.
I'm not on any high horse. I'm rightfully criticizing the decision to pardon the people who committed violent assault upon police officers. Just handwaving it away as "oops! Trump got impatient!" is weak. You can't claim to be the "part of law and order" or the "party of back the blue" with stunts like that. Thankfully, even police unions who endorsed Trump are beginning to wise up to the fact that "back the blue" was always a lie from Trump and the Republicans.I do not support a pardon for any violent rioter, particularly one who attacked a police officer. The rest didn't deserve their lengthy prison sentences. Same with the pro lifers peacefully protesting. Basically the JD Vance position.
Trump got impatient a said "f***k it pardon them all." Criticizing that decision is fair but I wouldn't get too high on your horse given the pardons and commutations given out by Biden, Obama and Clinton.
I highly doubt law enforcement unions, LEO union leadership, or law enforcement rank-and-file officers will ever “turn” on Trump, the GOP, or MAGA.I'm not on any high horse. I'm rightfully criticizing the decision to pardon the people who committed violent assault upon police officers. Just handwaving it away as "oops! Trump got impatient!" is weak. You can't claim to be the "part of law and order" or the "party of back the blue" with stunts like that. Thankfully, even police unions who endorsed Trump are beginning to wise up to the fact that "back the blue" was always a lie from Trump and the Republicans.
I think the presidential pardon power is way overdone and overused. If you're hoping I'm going to say that I defend Biden, Obama, and Clinton pardons while attacking Trump pardons, you're going to be waiting forever because I'm not going to defend any of them other than to say I'm not aware of Biden, Obama, and Clinton pardoning people who beat Capitol police to within an inch of their lives.
That's probably true, too.I highly doubt law enforcement unions, LEO union leadership, or law enforcement rank-and-file officers will ever “turn” on Trump, the GOP, or MAGA.
Especially if he eliminates taxes on overtime. Those guys kill it on overtime pay.I highly doubt law enforcement unions, LEO union leadership, or law enforcement rank-and-file officers will ever “turn” on Trump, the GOP, or MAGA.
Not sure of your use of "scoring political points". Do you mean practicing good politics? The most effective phrase / advertisement in the election was the one about "dems are for they / them, trump is for you. This just further drives that point home. The fact that all but 2 dems in the house voted against it reinforces that message. So great politics and the dems would do the same. If you are saying the dems wouldn't take the opportunity to brand the pubs in a negative light then that is something we would just have to disagree over. If I have missed your point then apologies and please give me further clarification.Thanks. So you agree this is an issue on which Pubs are scoring political points, rather than an issue that actually calls for federal involvement. I agree with that. Just wanted to clarify that while you're calling out hypocrisy on the part of Dems (which certainly exists), you're also willing to acknowledge when the Pubs are fucking hypocrites for partisan reasons, which is exemplified here.
I disagree and think she is most certainly one of the 5 most prominent faces of the current dem party and she is synonymous with woke. She is woke personified.What does AOC being the face of the party (which isn’t even really true) have to do with being woke?
Please zzl don't lose your shit because i'm not stating this as a 1 for 1 equivalency, but you don't have to stretch that line of reasoning to say then states should decide abortion rights. It's in the ballpark.The question is…who makes this decision? I don’t think (as I said earlier) it is the role of government. Leave it to the individual governing bodies of each league to decide how they want to handle it.
If the NCAA decides transgender women cannot compete in women’s sports, I would accept that.