I was responding to your question about whether people should have been upset, given that it was put back up. Of course people (including republicans) were upset during the time after it was taken down and before it was put back up.
And back to the administration lying…Katie Britt tweeted that this was malicious compliance, and Pete Hegseth…agreed! And said it would be corrected.
So…which the fuck is it? Malicious compliance or they took it down for editing (which isn’t necessary and a lame excuse, by the way) and always had every intention of putting it back on the website? Wouldn’t Hegseth know? They lied then or are lying now (probably both).
And as for why they put it back up, I think they realized some of this was just a little too much. Plus, since the republicans were falsely screeching about malicious compliance, they kind of had to put it back, no?