Tariffs Catch-All

  • Thread starter Thread starter BubbaOtis
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies: 4K
  • Views: 138K
  • Politics 
I believe the Clean Air Act amendments were introduced by Democrats and passed by Democrats that controlled the House and the Senate, but kudos to Poppy Bush for signing the bill

I'm not sure about the GI benefits. From your post, it suggests there was no need to pay benefits to 5,000 American soldiers ?
1. The GI benefits was a macabre joke. It was referring to the service members who lost their lives in Iraq.

2. The Clean Air Act Amendments were a bipartisan affair, but the idea of cap-and-trade -- the major regulatory innovation -- came from the center right. Some center left groups like Environmental Defense Fund were also involved (and EDF's support was vital for pitching to market-skeptical liberals), but it was the product of the nascent law & economics movement that was a conservative idea in law schools at the time.
 
1. The GI benefits was a macabre joke. It was referring to the service members who lost their lives in Iraq.

2. The Clean Air Act Amendments were a bipartisan affair, but the idea of cap-and-trade -- the major regulatory innovation -- came from the center right. Some center left groups like Environmental Defense Fund were also involved (and EDF's support was vital for pitching to market-skeptical liberals), but it was the product of the nascent law & economics movement that was a conservative idea in law schools at the time.
1 ) missed the snark:D

2 ) I checked the votes on the bill and it did pass easily in Congress with very little GOP opposition . I don't know if the bill was inspired by GOP conservatives in order to improve the lives of working and middle class American families, but if this was initiated and advocated by GOP conservatives in Congress, then I will give them a (y)
 
Tariffs live updates: Bessent says tariffs may return to 'reciprocal' levels if deals aren't made


“… Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent warned on Sunday that tariff rates will go back to "reciprocal" levels if countries do not make trade deals with the US during the 90-day pause.

President Trump has put them on notice that if you do not negotiate in good faith, you will ratchet back up to your April 2 level,” Bessent told CNN, highlighting the 18 key partners with whom the US is prioritizing trade deals. …

Trump said Friday that the US will set tariff rates for its trading partners within the next few weeks. He said his administration cannot negotiate trade deals with all countries at once due to limited capacity.

I think we’re going to be very fair. But it’s not possible to meet the number of people that want to see us,” the president said during a meeting with business executives in the United Arab Emirates.…”
 
Trump’s market graft strategy will eventually fail to move markets, and fundamentals will eventually return to influence, irrespective of the VIBES! hegemony.
 

The argument's over: Americans pay for tariffs​



“… Bessent said Sunday that while consumer prices may rise due to tariffs, people will see even bigger benefits from the falling price of gasoline.

IMG_7015.jpeg
 

The argument's over: Americans pay for tariffs​



“… Bessent said Sunday that while consumer prices may rise due to tariffs, people will see even bigger benefits from the falling price of gasoline.

IMG_7015.jpeg
This "argument" is very wuffie. Not only was it completely ridiculous, but it hit its high water mark in 1983.
 
The US is grappling with a deepening tourism crisis as tensions with Canada—fueled by new tariffs, political rhetoric, and heightened border scrutiny—have triggered a dramatic collapse in Canadian travel. Flights have been slashed, road crossings have declined sharply, and future bookings have plummeted, resulting in millions of dollars in lost tourism revenue. Once-reliable streams of Canadian visitors, who traditionally account for the largest share of international arrivals, are now drying up amid fears of detainment, device inspections, and broader disapproval of U.S. policies. These disruptions are severely impacting key tourism economies, especially in states like California and Minnesota, compounding the country’s border woes.

The US is experiencing a significant decline in Canadian tourism as geopolitical tensions, new tariffs, heightened border scrutiny, and growing fears about deportation and device inspections at ports of entry deter travelers. This growing rift between the U.S. and its northern neighbor is manifesting in severe economic repercussions, particularly in border states and tourism-dependent regions like California. With airlines slashing flights, bookings collapsing, and long-time visitors canceling travel, the impact on state and municipal economies is becoming increasingly dire.
In an attempt to salvage California’s shrinking international tourism base, a promotional campaign targeting Canadians was launched in April. The campaign presented the state as an open, welcoming escape from political tensions, marketing California as “the ultimate playground — 2,000 miles from Washington and a world away in mindset.”

Despite the effort, the campaign failed to reassure Canadian audiences. Online reactions quickly reflected widespread concern over the current U.S. political climate, especially under the second administration of President Donald Trump. The sharp rise in visa denials, the detention of tourists, and even high-profile deportation cases have fed growing anxiety among international travelers. Canadians expressed particular fears about border agents searching personal devices or misinterpreting political views, sparking concerns about civil liberties and personal security while in the U.S.


This rising apprehension has translated into measurable consequences. Visit California, the state’s official tourism body, has projected a 9% drop in international arrivals in 2025, with the most significant losses expected from Canada and Mexico. Canadian travelers, in particular, have historically contributed significantly to California’s tourism economy due to their frequent visits and high spending levels.

....


A Wake-Up Call for Policy and Industry Leaders​

The current crisis underscores the fragility of the tourism economy and the extent to which geopolitical decisions impact real-world behaviors. While international tourism can often seem immune to political changes, the collapse of Canadian travel to the U.S. serves as a sharp reminder that traveler sentiment is closely tied to national policies, public discourse, and diplomatic relations.

The US is facing escalating border challenges as Canadian tourism collapses due to tariff tensions, political backlash, and intensified border scrutiny. This sharp decline in flights, road trips, and bookings is costing millions in lost revenue across key travel markets.

Airlines, travel agencies, hotel operators, and municipal leaders are all urging a coordinated response to stabilize the situation. Some are calling for clearer border protocols, greater transparency, and diplomatic reassurances that address the fears keeping Canadians away.

As the summer season approaches, the United States faces a sobering reality: a vital revenue stream from its closest neighbor is evaporating. Without meaningful action to address the underlying causes, the damage to U.S. tourism could extend well beyond 2025 — threatening long-term economic stability in regions that have long relied on open, friendly cross-border travel.
 


(Statistically, Lutnick is generally right about the tariffs not having much impact on retail prices yet (or at least in the April data), but if folks think they have already felt it, (a) politically that is bad for Trump that people are blaming him for perceived inflation and (b) if the tariffs actually start to bite this summer, it will be magnified to people who already say they feel it.)
 
Back
Top