JCTarheel82
Honored Member
- Messages
- 832
Of course they did. Those guys have the collective IQ of a toaster.Tigerdroppings thinks he hit a grand slam today, in case you were wondering. lul
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Of course they did. Those guys have the collective IQ of a toaster.Tigerdroppings thinks he hit a grand slam today, in case you were wondering. lul
I apologize if this has been posted before, but I love what Lawrence O’Donnell had to say.
I don't think that's gonna happen . .Countdown to MSNBC announcing O'Donnell's replacement after that chiding?
Clearly it is getting no love with the keyboard pushed into the wall like that. I feel sorry for the instrument. I wonder when it was last properly tuned and what the humidity level is in that room?I believe that the conservatives from this board and the old board have presented us with honest versions of themselves. How they interact with people here is how they interact with people out in the world. They believe the things that they say here.
That doesn’t mean they are worth debating, so I find the troll label to be relatively meaningless.
I know O'Donnell has more clout, but after they axed Mehdi Hassan and Tiffany Cross for speaking out about things...I don't think that's gonna happen . .
Scarborough did call them out on air the next day, saying that if they ever do that again they can find someone else to host the show.I know O'Donnell has more clout, but after they axed Mehdi Hassan and Tiffany Cross for speaking out about things...
Not to mention pulling Morning Joe off the air the day after the assassination attempt out of fear of what Scarborough might say, I just don't trust their executives.
Lawerence O'Donnell not on the air tonight....Scarborough did call them out on air the next day, saying that if they ever do that again they can find someone else to host the show.
he always takes Friday off.Lawerence O'Donnell not on the air tonight....
Who makes the US tax code so complex? I doubt it’s the IRS.The US tax code is entirely too complex if we need that many people working for the IRS just to enforce it. It’s honestly absurd what our system is. A much simpler tax code would achieve many objectives but one of them would be no need to hire that many IRS agents.
I truly can’t imagine coming on a political message board and losing my mind when I find out someone is voting the opposite of me. Why even join the board if you can’t handle an opposing viewpoint?
The irony is that for the people he is trying to reach, his MAGA base, their historic perspective is that if a person is 1/8, 1/16 or even 1/32 black, they ARE black and treated accordingly by society.pure bloodlines only
People of mixed race are whatever republicans need to complain about at that moment in time.The irony is that for the people he is trying to reach, his MAGA base, their historic perspective is that if a person is 1/8, 1/16 or even 1/32 black, they ARE black and treated accordingly by society.
I am working behind the scenes to have an ignore function as you say. It'll be called super ignore or troll ignore and I think it's possible. The issue with it being provided initially was the hesitation due to threads looking "wonky" because a tree of replies about something might originate from someone you aren't ignoring but having quoted a person you do ignore.. happening. And the convo might appear nonsensical or there'd be a gap in the post number or something where you'd have to be like oh that's because I ignored so and so.Let me start by saying I like the "Ignore" function on this board. Let me further say I like that the original post remains blocked when quoted by others. My question is: In addition to blocking posts by an ignored poster and blocking the portion of post that contains what an ignored poster wrote, can the posts that respond to the ignored poster also be blocked. I have nothing against those who respond to and try to educate those whom I have on ignore, it's just that I have no interest in reading those efforts and find myself just scrolling past them, unread. If posts by both ignored posters and those who quote ignored poster were hidden on this thread: (a) it would be quicker to read and (b) I wouldn't miss a single thing I find interesting.
ETA: I never watch Fox News. I grew up watching Jesse Helms "editorials" on WRAL-TV and can state that I learned absolutely nothing of value from those editorials beyond the fact that Jesse Helms was a vicious, delusional racist, which I already knew from from sources other than his editorials. I can figure out who is a vicious delusional racist/facist/BSC without subjecting myself to their lunacy firsthand. As Liebnitz said of an anonymous letter written by Issac Newton, "I can recognize a lion by its pawprint." I can recognize a BSC facist/racist by what they say and don't need proof in tripicate.
Rule #1: Pay no attention to anything I say.I am working behind the scenes to have an ignore function as you say. It'll be called super ignore or troll ignore and I think it's possible. The issue with it being provided initially was the hesitation due to threads looking "wonky" because a tree of replies about something might originate from someone you aren't ignoring but having quoted a person you do ignore.. happening. And the convo might appear nonsensical or there'd be a gap in the post number or something where you'd have to be like oh that's because I ignored so and so.
I personally agree it should work like that but I understand why they were hesitant to build it in that way. So, I'll see if I can pull it off and let you know. I don't think that much valuable info will be lost if you're ignoring posts from people who aren't ignored but are talking about an ignored person. Makes sense to me.
Will keep you/the forum posted.