Trump Rallies & Interviews Catch-All | Trump - “just stop talking about that”

  • Thread starter Thread starter nycfan
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies: 3K
  • Views: 64K
  • Politics 
altmin said:
Is he talking about Disney?
Click to expand...
He is presumably talking about Los Diablos de la 42, a gang of young Venezuelan teens that the NY Post has been building into nightmare fuel and alleging exist due to Biden policies and the city’ sanctuary city policies and state laws that make it hard to charge them as adults. Pipsqueaks (their description) robbing people in Times Square and Central Park, sometimes with knives or at gunpoint.

I don’t know how rampant their crime spree really is (and no one wants to get mugged by kids or adults) but am pretty confident that these guys haven’t taken over Times Square just yet.
 
quakerdevil said:
We don't send buses is pretty damn funny after what happened in Cali
Click to expand...
That's what I was thinking - yes, your campaign doesn't send buses, even if they are needed to take your own supporters (including a good number of elderly MAGAs) out of the desert in the middle of freaking nowhere, thus leaving them to fend for themselves. And of course all of these suckers are still going to vote for him, but the reason Kamala's campaign and other Democrats keep needling him about his rallies is because it so clearly gets under his skin and leads him to obsess over it constantly. No wonder Putin and China's Xi Jinping want Trump returned to power - it's so easy to get into his head.
 
Mulberry Heel said:
That's what I was thinking - yes, your campaign doesn't send buses, even if they are needed to take your own supporters (including a good number of elderly MAGAs) out of the desert in the middle of freaking nowhere, thus leaving them to fend for themselves. And of course all of these suckers are still going to vote for him, but the reason Kamala's campaign and other Democrats keep needling him about his rallies is because it so clearly gets under his skin and leads him to obsess over it constantly. No wonder Putin and China's Xi Jinping want Trump returned to power - it's so easy to get into his head.
Click to expand...
There's plenty of empty space.
 
circlesky88 said:
Really, at this point what does it matter that people are leaving his rallies early? They are still going to vote for him.
Click to expand...
1. It tells you something about enthusiasm
2. It tells us how well Trump's message is working
3. Are the people leaving early going to tell their friends and family, "OMG Trump was awesome" or might they say, "I think he is losing it."

I've never been convinced that rally size is a proxy for anything much, but if you're going to have a rally, you need to -- you know, rally your supporters. Worst of all worlds is a rally where nobody is excited.
 
CHAMTRAIN said:
I think it's important for Harris to do Rogan, huge audience and a chance to speak to the margins. Joe is a bit dumb but he's not mean spirited, he won't come at her unprofessionally. 3 hours on Rogan is honestly a massive opportunity for her to shine, if she's up for it.

The problem the left faces is certain spaces are "off limit", she will be heavily criticized for going simply based on the public perception of Joe and his previous content. IMO this is where Trump has run a much better campaign than her, he's pushed the envelope to reach larger audiences.

I hope she does it, I think she'll be great, hope the overly sensitive portion of our party doesn't grill her for it.
Click to expand...
Agree with this. It’s unlikely to get many votes for her. But this may be an election decided by a very small number of votes. If it sways an undecided to her or perhaps takes a low propensity voter that’s a Trumper and makes them an undecided who simply doesn’t vote, it could add up.
 
superrific said:
Then he says at the end of that post that this message could have been sent by anyone to anyone and has no merit. So it seems as if the tweeter is intentionally spreading disinformation and is honest about that.

Can you please not post disinformation to this message board?
Click to expand...

So if you place a disclaimer on your post, yanno, to be responsible about what you’re spreading so that people don’t take it for the holy gospel truth, that makes it disinformation?

If that’s your definition of disinformation, I’ll disagree.

Disinformation is false information intended to mislead people. A disclaimer is attached to prevent that.
 
dukeman92 said:
So if you place a disclaimer on your post, yanno, to be responsible about what you’re spreading so that people don’t take it for the holy gospel truth, that makes it disinformation?

If that’s your definition of disinformation, I’ll disagree.

Disinformation is false information intended to mislead people. A disclaimer is attached to prevent that.
Click to expand...
The disclaimer is "FWIW take it?" I didn't even see that comment above the large tweet image. Don't do this JD Vance thing where you make the reader responsible for determining whether it's disinformation. Just please don't post bullshit. nycfan posts all sorts of tweets and images, and so do others.

We all like it because she doesn't post bullshit. And we trust it. So when you come along and post bullshit in the same mode and manner, it makes it hard for people to read. I don't want to have to look for disclaimers and I don't think anyone else does either. I would rather not have to look at the poster name and cross-check that with a list of posters who are full of shit.

If you're going to post bullshit, then you're going to get put on ignore because you are ruining the board for other people. Is that what you want?
 
superrific said:
The disclaimer is "FWIW take it?" I didn't even see that comment above the large tweet image. Don't do this JD Vance thing where you make the reader responsible for determining whether it's disinformation. Just please don't post bullshit. nycfan posts all sorts of tweets and images, and so do others.

We all like it because she doesn't post bullshit. And we trust it. So when you come along and post bullshit in the same mode and manner, it makes it hard for people to read. I don't want to have to look for disclaimers and I don't think anyone else does either. I would rather not have to look at the poster name and cross-check that with a list of posters who are full of shit.

If you're going to post bullshit, then you're going to get put on ignore because you are ruining the board for other people. Is that what you want?
Click to expand...

This is the second time you’ve come at me for no reason. Are your kids acting up again? I think that was the excuse you gave last time. If you think I’m posting bullshit, put me on ignore.

The same mode and manner… 😂 how the hell else are you supposed to embed a tweet? 🙄
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top