Ukraine War | Russia launches (I)CBM (not nuke) at Ukraine?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Batt Boy
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies: 313
  • Views: 7K
  • Politics 
CFordUNC said:


Lmao. Russia is so desperate to make the rest of the world think they will actually use nuclear weapons and nobody is buying it.

My biggest policy disagreement with the Biden administration has been the refusal until now to allow Ukraine to strike into Russia with U.S.-provided missiles. Russia never has and never will have the balls to use nuclear weapons- tactical or otherwise- and we should have been calling their weak ass bluff a long time ago. I hope Ukraine spends the next two months raining down unholy hell onto Russians so that they get a little taste of what the last three years have been like in Ukraine.
Click to expand...

Amen. They aren't gonna do shit and their generals wouldn't follow any orders to launch. They all know full well the score. They are the class bully who cries after being punched once in the mouth.
 
superrific said:
He does. It's a question of risk tolerance. How much risk of a thermonuclear war that might kill us all are you willing to accept? 1%? 0.1%?

And remember: Biden has to make the decision for everyone. Not just America. The whole world could potentially suffer horrible, horrible consequences. And they don't get any input. Imagine being a person living in India and reading about Russia and the US escalating threats. You'd probably be really pissed that your existence was in the hands of an old guy and a psychopath.

So I think it's the right thing to do to minimize that risk. The future of the species really shouldn't in our hands. We shouldn't be making that decision. It's not our right.
Click to expand...
But of course, not making a decision is a decision, too. And I know you know that - but for others in the audience.

In other words, if you don’t make certain decisions because you are afraid of a 0.1% risk of a nuclear war, that appeasement in and of itself could create an even higher risk of a nuclear war.
 
Calheel said:
But of course, not making a decision is a decision, too. And I know you know that - but for others in the audience.

In other words, if you don’t make certain decisions because you are afraid of a 0.1% risk of a nuclear war, that appeasement in and of itself could create an even higher risk of a nuclear war.
Click to expand...
Ask Neville Chamberlain
 
I appreciate Biden's caution but I do think at some point you have to call Putin's bluff. This thing has been going on near 3 years and he's done all sorts of horrible war crimes and has now escalated it further by involving an entirely new country. I don't think we can just sit back forever while Russia ups the ante over and over until they get everything they want. It's possible our best chance at stopping him is right now while he's relatively weak and there is a country of people willing to stand up and fight him. If we waste that opportunity it likely only gets more difficult in the future.
 
Calheel said:
In other words, if you don’t make certain decisions because you are afraid of a 0.1% risk of a nuclear war, that appeasement in and of itself could create an even higher risk of a nuclear war.
Click to expand...
In theory. Probably not in practice, but you're not wrong.
 
superrific said:
So I think it's the right thing to do to minimize that risk. The future of the species really shouldn't in our hands. We shouldn't be making that decision. It's not our right.
Click to expand...
But at some point you no longer have an option. If taken to the extreme, he could rule over the world with threats of nuclear war.

That said, I am a pessimist on the matter and have believed that the odds of going 500 more years without a nuclear war is very close to zero. We came so close so many times in the first 50 years of having nuclear weapons.

IMO, the only way we avoid that fate is if society collapses to a point where nuclear weapons can't be produce or maintained. But even in that scenario, society would rebuild and nukes would be rebuilt or rediscovered unless humans die out.
 
ChapelHillSooner said:
But at some point you no longer have an option. If taken to the extreme, he could rule over the world with threats of nuclear war.

That said, I am a pessimist on the matter and have believed that the odds of going 500 more years without a nuclear war is very close to zero. We came so close so many times in the first 50 years of having nuclear weapons.

IMO, the only way we avoid that fate is if society collapses to a point where nuclear weapons can't be produce or maintained. But even in that scenario, society would rebuild and nukes would be rebuilt or rediscovered unless humans die out.
Click to expand...
500 years? If AI doesn't kill us by the turn of the century, climate change will.

Obviously at some point there's no option. That's why I said minimize. Before we start to worry about Putin ruling over the world, let's see if he can successfully peel off 15% of Ukraine's territory.
 
CFordUNC said:


Lmao. Russia is so desperate to make the rest of the world think they will actually use nuclear weapons and nobody is buying it.

My biggest policy disagreement with the Biden administration has been the refusal until now to allow Ukraine to strike into Russia with U.S.-provided missiles. Russia never has and never will have the balls to use nuclear weapons- tactical or otherwise- and we should have been calling their weak ass bluff a long time ago. I hope Ukraine spends the next two months raining down unholy hell onto Russians so that they get a little taste of what the last three years have been like in Ukraine.
Click to expand...


Russia should be ashamed that they haven't toppled Ukraine in three years. It's a testament to the complete shit show that their country and army are. Even with the trump terrorist team at the helm, Russia doesn't want war with the United States.
 

Russian gains accelerating as Biden approves new weapon use for Ukraine​


“…
Data from the Institute for the Study of War (ISW) shows that Russia has gained almost six times as much territory in 2024 as it did in 2023, and is advancing towards key Ukrainian logistical hubs in the eastern Donbas region.

Meanwhile, Ukraine's surprise incursion into Russia's Kursk region is faltering. Russian troops have pushed Kyiv's offensive backwards. Experts have questioned the success of the offensive, with one calling it a "strategic catastrophe" given manpower shortages faced by Ukraine. …”

www.bbc.com

Russian gains accelerate as Ukraine's Kursk gamble falters

Moscow's forces have taken more ground since September than they did over the course of 2023, analysts say.
www.bbc.com www.bbc.com
 
dukeman92 said:
Russia should be ashamed that they haven't toppled Ukraine in three years. It's a testament to the complete shit show that their country and army are. Even with the trump terrorist team at the helm, Russia doesn't want war with the United States.
Click to expand...
That isn't going to happen. Trump will appease Putin with Ukraine territory to negotiate an end to the conflict.
Putin gets to claim victory and Trump gets to brag that he accomplished what the previous administration failed to do.
Ukraine gets no reparations for the devastation of its infrastructure and loss of life.
 
mynameisbond said:
That isn't going to happen. Trump will appease Putin with Ukraine territory to negotiate an end to the conflict.
Putin gets to claim victory and Trump gets to brag that he accomplished what the previous administration failed to do.
Ukraine gets no reparations for the devastation of its infrastructure and loss of life.
Click to expand...
Trump will definitely pull support and claim he brokered a deal to end the war. It remains to be seen if Ukraine stops fighting and agrees to those terms, however. They may decide to continue the war and try to beef up support from the EU. It's hard for me to imagine them agreeing to just giving Russia part of their territory and ending the war knowing full well that Putin will just build up in the newly acquired territory and stage another invasion from there in the future. Of course Trump being the complete piece of shit he is will act like it's all Ukraine's fault they didn't accept his Putin loving terms.
 
After reading this I honestly don't know where I fall on this latest escalation by Biden.


Its trump's nature to want to broker a deal because he isn't a war monger and more likely his ego will push him to take the chamberlain approach of ceding some territory because he boasted of ending the war and he wants to look like the hero.

I am questioning biden's motivation or rationale given his 2 month window. Why do it now?
 
Callatoroy said:
After reading this I honestly don't know where I fall on this latest escalation by Biden.


Its trump's nature to want to broker a deal because he isn't a war monger and more likely his ego will push him to take the chamberlain approach of ceding some territory because he boasted of ending the war and he wants to look like the hero.

I am questioning biden's motivation or rationale given his 2 month window. Why do it now?
Click to expand...
Why do it now? As opposed to 6 months ago? Because doing it before the election would likely have played into Trump’s hands. If you mean why not do it as soon as the polls closed on Election Day, I think that’s a fair question. Why do it at all is a no-brainer. Because Trump has campaigned on “ending” the conflict and undermining NATO. That’s unacceptable to anyone who isn’t a Russian stooge. Even if Trump is insistent on bending the knee, he would be in a stronger position with Ukraine already have been given more leeway in its own defense.
 
Last edited:
Callatoroy said:
After reading this I honestly don't know where I fall on this latest escalation by Biden.


Its trump's nature to want to broker a deal because he isn't a war monger and more likely his ego will push him to take the chamberlain approach of ceding some territory because he boasted of ending the war and he wants to look like the hero.

I am questioning biden's motivation or rationale given his 2 month window. Why do it now?
Click to expand...
Because it should have been done 18+ months ago. It was always, IMO, a policy failure to restrict Ukraine from striking into Russian territory. It never made sense that it was fine for Russia to target and massacre civilians but Ukraine was supposed to not retaliate in kind. If we didn't want them to use our weaponry a certain way, then we shouldn't have provided it.

One of the primary reasons that I no longer identify with the Republican Party is because its led by someone who has convinced the Republican base that we should make concessions to foreign thugs like Putin, and that by ceding sovereign Ukrainian territory, we are "making the best deals". Russia is not entitled to one square fucking inch of Ukrainian territory. Not one square inch. Every single person in Moscow should be dead before Ukraine is forced to cede a square inch of their country. The Republican Party used to be able to be counted upon to tell Russia to fuck all the way off. Now, the GOP grovels at the feet of an authoritarian tyrant who would turn the entirety of the United States into a grease stain on the map if he could get away with it.
 
Imagine the outrage from all the R's fake patriots if Biden made a deal with Russia that ceded any Ukrainian territory to Russia. And also, how can anyone compete with these double standards? Makes me sick. Fucking sick to my stomach.
 
Enigma94 said:
Trump will definitely pull support and claim he brokered a deal to end the war. It remains to be seen if Ukraine stops fighting and agrees to those terms, however. They may decide to continue the war and try to beef up support from the EU. It's hard for me to imagine them agreeing to just giving Russia part of their territory and ending the war knowing full well that Putin will just build up in the newly acquired territory and stage another invasion from there in the future. Of course Trump being the complete piece of shit he is will act like it's all Ukraine's fault they didn't accept his Putin loving terms.
Click to expand...

I'm not sure its a given that Putin will reinvade. He hasn't reinvaded Georgia. And don't forget that Russia has really been hurt by this war with casualties and economically. I doubt they will be eager to start another war for a decade or two.

A negotiation where Ukraine loses Russian majority provinces and Ukraine is a non-nato state with guarantees for democracy could work. It wouldn't be all that great for Ukraine to lose territory and it wouldn't be all that great for Russia to have a Western leaning Ukraine as a neighbor but considering the punishment that both countries have taken, it might be a sustainable peace.
 
gtyellowjacket said:
I'm not sure its a given that Putin will reinvade. He hasn't reinvaded Georgia. And don't forget that Russia has really been hurt by this war with casualties and economically. I doubt they will be eager to start another war for a decade or two.

A negotiation where Ukraine loses Russian majority provinces and Ukraine is a non-nato state with guarantees for democracy could work. It wouldn't be all that great for Ukraine to lose territory and it wouldn't be all that great for Russia to have a Western leaning Ukraine as a neighbor but considering the punishment that both countries have taken, it might be a sustainable peace.
Click to expand...
I mean you're stupid so I'm not surprised you believe Putin will just stop where he is today.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top