I think the relevant question is "How is what is being stated 'untrue'?"
Is it completely untrue and being made up out of whole cloth? Or is it untrue by degrees and simply being exaggerated by sources or those reporting it?
Given the wide variety of accusations and information that came out yesterday and provided to a wide variety of media - UNC-focused, regional news, and national sports - I would be very, very surprised if these accusations/information were being created whole cloth. And I'd be surprised if they were not exaggerated as they were presented by the various media.
The operative question, to which we don't have a good answer at this time, is how much of what was presented yesterday was factual or close to factual?