USA Impacts of bombing Iran

  • Thread starter Thread starter nycfan
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies: 208
  • Views: 5K
  • Politics 
gtyellowjacket said:
Likely Inaccurate.

"Unpaired t-tests revealed no significant difference between the women and men in either relaxed or straining G tolerance."

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Women's G tolerance - PubMed

G tolerances of 102 women and 139 men subjected to Standard Medical Evaluation (Medeval) G Profiles were compared. Unpaired t-tests revealed no significant difference between the women and men in either relaxed or straining G tolerance. Covariance analysis controlling for differences in...
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Click to expand...
Thank you. I'm not an expert and sometimes I am incorrect in my recollection of things. I appreciate the tone of the response and the information you provided.
 
Callatoroy said:
Come here in July and august. It’s hotter than the equator
Click to expand...
Well, it's the South. We were in the mid-90's yesterday in Raleigh and, according to weatherunderground, it felt like 110. Looks like we'll cool down to a frosty 95/feels like 105 today, but the point is, if you're in the South, it gonna be hot in the summer. I was more talking about the amenities, anyway. I would've certainly agreed with your assessment, even in that regard, back in the 80's and 90's. Seemed like Colo was jarhead central back then. Not that I went there often, although I did see the Dead's one and only appearance in SC on Halloween '85 (great show).

When my stepdaughter told us she was applying to USC, I rolled my eyes and basically said the same thing you did about Columbia. But when we went for her recon visit, I could see that a sea change had taken place, at least in terms of the amenities I value (bars, restaurants, accommodations, shopping, etc). She ended up going there and we looked forward to visiting. That was a fun four years...
 
For the TACO files

www.theguardian.com

Trump and Hegseth admit doubts about level of damage to Iran nuclear sites

President calls intelligence ‘inconclusive’ while defence secretary describes harm to facilities as ‘moderate to severe’
www.theguardian.com www.theguardian.com

Donald Trump and the US defence secretary, Pete Hegseth, have admitted to some doubt over the scale of the damage inflicted on Iran’s nuclear sites by the US bombing at the weekend, after a leaked Pentagon assessment said the Iranian programme had been set back by only a few months.

“The intelligence was very inconclusive,” Trump told journalists at a Nato summit in The Hague, introducing an element of uncertainty for the first time after several days of emphatic declarations that the destruction had been total. “The intelligence says we don’t know. It could’ve been very severe. That’s what the intelligence suggests.”


The president then appeared to revert to his claim that “it was very severe. There was obliteration”. Later in the day, he went to claim that was the conclusion from “collected intelligence”, and that the Iranian programme had been set back “decades”.

Trump also likened the US use of massive bunker-buster bombs on the Fordow and Natanz uranium enrichment sites to the impact of the US nuclear weapons dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki in the second world war, using the comparison specifically in reference to their impact in ending a conflict.

Over the course of the day, Trump’s claims became more far-reaching, even rejecting reports from the nuclear watchdog, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), that Iran’s 400kg stock of 60% enriched uranium could no longer be accounted for, and appeared to have been moved. Earlier in the week, the vice president, JD Vance, had appeared to admit the US did not know where the highly enriched uranium was, said it would be a subject of discussions with the Iranians.

Trump claimed there would be a US-Iran meeting next week to negotiate once more about Tehran’s nuclear programme. “We’re going to talk to them next week with Iran, we may sign an agreement, I don’t know,” he said, before adding: “I don’t care if I have an agreement or not.”

Trump was also markedly less confident on Wednesday about the ceasefire he had previous declared was “unlimited” and “going to go forever”, even suggesting that a return to conflict could be imminent.

“I dealt with both and they’re both tired, exhausted ... and can it start again? I guess someday, it can. It could maybe start soon,” he said.
 
hedge said:
Well, it's the South. We were in the mid-90's yesterday in Raleigh and, according to weatherunderground, it felt like 110. Looks like we'll cool down to a frosty 95/feels like 105 today, but the point is, if you're in the South, it gonna be hot in the summer. I was more talking about the amenities, anyway. I would've certainly agreed with your assessment, even in that regard, back in the 80's and 90's. Seemed like Colo was jarhead central back then. Not that I went there often, although I did see the Dead's one and only appearance in SC on Halloween '85 (great show).

When my stepdaughter told us she was applying to USC, I rolled my eyes and basically said the same thing you did about Columbia. But when we went for her recon visit, I could see that a sea change had taken place, at least in terms of the amenities I value (bars, restaurants, accommodations, shopping, etc). She ended up going there and we looked forward to visiting. That was a fun four years...
Click to expand...
Agree that Columbia has become a much more fun place to visit. But holy god, that city is the face of the sun in the summer.
 
Calheel said:
I think there is an optical illusion with the goal line. When you are eyes are focused on the horizon, it looks like you are in the endzone before you are.

In little league football, I picked up a fumble at midfield and raced to the endzone. I was tackled at the three yard line because I slowed up once I passed the five. So I 've always had a soft spot for these mistakes. Good rule of thumb is to run your ass off (with the ball) until you are past the back line of the endzone.
Click to expand...
And then hand it to the official after blowing the whistle hanging around his neck for him.
 
Calheel said:
I think there is an optical illusion with the goal line. When you are eyes are focused on the horizon, it looks like you are in the endzone before you are.

In little league football, I picked up a fumble at midfield and raced to the endzone. I was tackled at the three yard line because I slowed up once I passed the five. So I 've always had a soft spot for these mistakes. Good rule of thumb is to run your ass off (with the ball) until you are past the back line of the endzone.
Click to expand...
Like Forest Gump, full speed through the end zone and into the locker.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top