Where do we go from here?

  • Thread starter Thread starter rodoheel
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies: 534
  • Views: 7K
  • Politics 
Paine said:
Gallego did well with Latinos in a cycle where Dems lost a ton of support from them overall. I’m not lionizing him, but I think it’s also silly to say he only won because Lake was a bad candidate.

Lately the Democrats have been obsessed with DNC chairs who didn’t even win their own elections.
Click to expand...
Well, Gallego is also Latino. But really, I'm not saying that he only won because Lake was a bad candidate. I'm saying that it's hard to estimate how good he is because he wasn't tested. That's all.

What would you like aspiring Dems from red states to do? Should we tell Jamie Harrison to fuck off because he couldn't win as a black Democrat in South Carolina? There aren't enough Secretary of Transportation jobs for all of them, and we don't even control the WH anyway.

I have no real opinion about this issue, because I don't even really understand exactly what the DNC chair does, how much power s/he has, what are the priorities, etc. I just don't think "he lost that election, so he sucks" is the right approach. Are we going to say that about Beto also?
 
superrific said:
Well, Gallego is also Latino. But really, I'm not saying that he only won because Lake was a bad candidate. I'm saying that it's hard to estimate how good he is because he wasn't tested. That's all.

What would you like aspiring Dems from red states to do? Should we tell Jamie Harrison to fuck off because he couldn't win as a black Democrat in South Carolina? There aren't enough Secretary of Transportation jobs for all of them, and we don't even control the WH anyway.

I have no real opinion about this issue, because I don't even really understand exactly what the DNC chair does, how much power s/he has, what are the priorities, etc. I just don't think "he lost that election, so he sucks" is the right approach. Are we going to say that about Beto also?
Click to expand...
Harrison has already said he won’t run again for DNC chair, so your point is moot.
 
Illithor said:
So you’re saying you endorse the idea of rigging a primary against its strongest candidate if they aren’t 100% aligned with the party at all times? Interesting.

Older Fox News-watching boomer types probably all hate Bernie and believe the socialism thing, but I bet if you polled the younger Trump voters (like the ones who watch Rogan - who endorsed him in 2016), they would poll favorably towards him. He was the antidote to Trump in 2016. The problem wasn’t that he isn’t a “true democrat”. It was that Wall Street and big money politics didn’t want a guy who would ACTUALLY change things in favor of the average struggling American (who now flock to Trump, who doesn’t give AF about them).

I don’t know where we go from here. MSM is basically dead in the water if the Trump team decides to ban big pharma advertising, because nobody watches it anymore.
Click to expand...
Again, again, again. You cannot build a political movement on a base that does not vote. Younger voters don't vote. Seniors do. How young people think is just not of paramount importance -- or all that much importance at all -- in the short term. Longer term, yes.
 
Illithor said:
So you’re saying you endorse the idea of rigging a primary against its strongest candidate if they aren’t 100% aligned with the party at all times? Interesting.

Older Fox News-watching boomer types probably all hate Bernie and believe the socialism thing, but I bet if you polled the younger Trump voters (like the ones who watch Rogan - who endorsed him in 2016), they would poll favorably towards him. He was the antidote to Trump in 2016. The problem wasn’t that he isn’t a “true democrat”. It was that Wall Street and big money politics didn’t want a guy who would ACTUALLY change things in favor of the average struggling American (who now flock to Trump, who doesn’t give AF about them).

I don’t know where we go from here. MSM is basically dead in the water if the Trump team decides to ban big pharma advertising, because nobody watches it anymore.
Click to expand...
If he couldn't make headway against the warm breeze of a Democratic primary, how in the hell do you think he would do against the heat from the Trump campaign? How anyone could think he should be anointed when he can't muster the power base to win it is beyond me. That's a huge part of campaigning, no matter how tawdry it might seem.

Btw, I never took an interest but what is behind your claim that the primary was rigged in short form? You have me curious. I still believe the above is right from a purely pragmatic POV.
 
dukeman92 said:
You can't.
Click to expand...
and that is why all we can do is sit and wait for the GOP to break everything. It's not a great strategy for a nation.

Have one party with a base that begs to be insulted and lied to, and another party that can only sniff office when they have to fix things, then immediately get kicked out so the other party can break shit again.
 
I don’t know where I go from here in all honesty. Something changed in America this past Tuesday. I need to figure out how to live and protect my family’s future in this new paradigm.
 
aGDevil2k said:
You cant. But as the video said, stop with the trying to parse everything. We dont have to win working class white voters. But if we shave just 10 points off those losses, so we lose counties 60-40 instead of 65-35 (or more) then suddenly the game has absolutely changed.

I mean this was as red wavey as we have seen in a decade. And even with that, it's not like Trump just steamrolled...and it's not like the senate and house will be a bloodletting
Click to expand...

Yeah, I have thought a lot about how to chip away at that disparity with white working-class voters. I have thought that serious amounts of direct mail might be the way to go. Here's my best pitch for this strategy: These people are watching Fox News or worse, or they're not paying much attention to news and politics. The low-information voters. They aren't going to watch CNN or go buy the local paper -- and what good would that do, anyway?

But stuff in their mail -- that they have to look at it, even if it's to throw it away? Maybe they glance for a few seconds, at least. Maybe something catches their attention. Catchy titles and graphics. Short, easily digestible pieces about what Republicans want to do to your healthcare, how they want to wreck your local public schools, how tariffs work. Factual but sensationalized enough to hopefully target people's emotions.

I don't know. But if the theory is that these people are uneducated, and if it's very difficult to reach them through traditional forms of media, then this idea is maybe....something. It would cost a lot of money. OK. But it could also be tested and scaled up or down based on whether it appears to be making an impact (elections, surveys and polls, etc.).

Just to quickly add: I have a good friend who ran for an open statehouse seat in Spartanburg back in 2008 (seems like ages ago). He ran as a Democrat and, of course, got beat rather handily. But he made some real inroads, I think, in rural and working-class areas by canvassing and talking to. people. He way, way out-performed Obama in one such precinct. It made me think that they aren't entirely unreachable. Of course, he and his volunteers put in a pretty extraordinary effort only to lose....probably not easy to expect many to sign up for that.
 
Tyler Hansbruh said:
As with anything on social media take with a grain of salt but it’ll be interesting to see these kind of anecdotes in the coming weeks/months
Click to expand...

This will happen, but I'm skeptical that it's happening now. Do companies not planning on giving out bonuses usually broadcast that fact a month and a half in advance?
 
Tyler Hansbruh said:
As with anything on social media take with a grain of salt but it’ll be interesting to see these kind of anecdotes in the coming weeks/months
Click to expand...

The ignorance is just astounding.

Even if the foreign producers did pay the tariff, do they not understand that that would be passed on to higher prices to buy the product?

Do they think that the foreign producer is operating with a 70% margin on the widgets they produce and would willingly eat the difference? If they had those type of margins, someone else would have been producing the widget for cheaper.
 
superrific said:
This will happen, but I'm skeptical that it's happening now. Do companies not planning on giving out bonuses usually broadcast that fact a month and a half in advance?
Click to expand...
Why? They need to get the widgets in stock ASAP before possible tariffs take effect. It makes total sense to use your available cash to buy as many widgets as possible now.

A company that is putting this in motion would already know they won't have cash to pay bonuses. Better to let the employees know early. At least it is more ethical to do so. Sure, stating it early can cause some conflict but not nearly as much as springing on the employees a week before Christmas. Have you not seen Christmas Vacation? ;-)
 
Illithor said:
So you’re saying you endorse the idea of rigging a primary against its strongest candidate if they aren’t 100% aligned with the party at all times? Interesting.

Older Fox News-watching boomer types probably all hate Bernie and believe the socialism thing, but I bet if you polled the younger Trump voters (like the ones who watch Rogan - who endorsed him in 2016), they would poll favorably towards him. He was the antidote to Trump in 2016. The problem wasn’t that he isn’t a “true democrat”. It was that Wall Street and big money politics didn’t want a guy who would ACTUALLY change things in favor of the average struggling American (who now flock to Trump, who doesn’t give AF about them).

I don’t know where we go from here. MSM is basically dead in the water if the Trump team decides to ban big pharma advertising, because nobody watches it anymore.
Click to expand...
It isn’t a matter of not being aligned with the party, it is a matter of not being in the party at all. This is not “rigging” anything. If you want the Democratic nomination, be a Democrat. This isn’t hard, why are you struggling with something so simple?
 
Tyler Hansbruh said:
As with anything on social media take with a grain of salt but it’ll be interesting to see these kind of anecdotes in the coming weeks/months
Click to expand...

I feel confident this “I know a guy” story is bullshit. Also, it’s the type of brazen lying (assuming I’m right) that the Dem party should flood into social media every. Single. Day.
 
bassydude77 said:
I just can't get over what people see in Trump. It's less about why she lost, but how could he win.

A convicted felon, serial sexual harrasser, insurrectionist/ traitor, multiple bankruptcies, multiple marriages w/ infidelity, narcissitic sociopath, said to be incompotent/ dangerous/ unfit by a majority of his previous cabinet.
Click to expand...
When it comes to the convictions there’s one major thing a lot of liberals are missing. He didn’t win in spite of those allegations brought against him. In many ways he won because of them. Many people in the center and right of the spectrum saw that for what it was, prosecution of a political rival.
 
HeelYeah2012 said:
When it comes to the convictions there’s one major thing a lot of liberals are missing. He didn’t win in spite of those allegations brought against him. In many ways he won because of them. Many people in the center and right of the spectrum saw that for what it was, prosecution of a political rival.
Click to expand...
Do you think he violated the law?
 
HeelYeah2012 said:
When it comes to the convictions there’s one major thing a lot of liberals are missing. He didn’t win in spite of those allegations brought against him. In many ways he won because of them. Many people in the center and right of the spectrum saw that for what it was, prosecution of a political rival.
Click to expand...
Has anyone been sheltered so often by so many people for so many things in their life? He's had the benefit of more cover ups than a bed at a by the hour motel. That's the real runny diarrhetic stuff you're selling there. Was he convicted by a legally seated jury? Do you believe in the Constitution and the American system of justice?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top