Welcome to our community

Be apart of something great, join today!

Register Log in

Where do we go from here?

  • Thread starter Thread starter rodoheel
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies: 1K
  • Views: 24K
  • Politics 
Callatoroy said:
From a practical pov he basically undid everything trump did at the border and created a nightmare for the country. Releasing them into the country was completely contrary to what trump was doing. Then he put kackling kamala in charge of the border and it was the deer in the headlights. She was grossly incapable due to low intellect and competency. Hell, for 3 years they denied the border was an issue and she even said it was secure in an interview.
Click to expand...
I’m sorry, but it is mind blowing that you are discussing intellect, without acknowledging that, the way things are going now, J.D. Vance is going to be the voice of reason and intelligence in the Trump administration.

Kamala is more intelligent than any of the names seriously being bandied about for any position in Trump’s cabinet. For this reason, more than any other, you should be concerned. These are not “good faith” people, and they are neither intelligent, nor competent.

And you are putting that man in charge surrounded by those people who are incredibly unprepared to do those jobs, and you expect exactly what to happen?

This is the best he can do? Either because everyone else said “no,” or because he is arrogant enough not to care (or, god forbid, the third option, that he really does think that they are as good as anyone else is for the job, because he still doesn’t understand what each job entails).

Really?

Really.

Mind blowing.
 
Matt Gaetz is going to be our next Secretary of State. The man thinks he is still at a kegger at Theta Chi.

This is the best Trump could do?

I’m not saying that you should be freaking out, or anything, but if that doesn’t give you pause, I just don’t think you take politics seriously.
 
We are all talking about the law. And the law is about semantics. Which is why good laws take so long to be put in place.

And that’s the problem with building real legislation as a president. Certain laws have to be put in place in the first 100 days. That is generally when presidents have the most popularity. Other laws need to be built around a larger infrastructure. They take time because they involve more agencies. We can discuss the intelligence of each law, but the timing is different because the scope is different. It’s not that one is being placed as being more important than the other. Or at least not the one you think. Biden’s border/immigration law was the more important, which is why it took him longer to roll it out.
 
sringwal said:
Matt Gaetz is going to be our next Secretary of State. The man thinks he is still at a kegger at Theta Chi.

This is the best Trump could do?

I’m not saying that you should be freaking out, or anything, but if that doesn’t give you pause, I just don’t think you take politics seriously.
Click to expand...
Worse
Attorney General
Little Marco is Sec of State nominee
 
Fuck. Right.

Vance will be the most intelligent.

Rubio will be the most empathetic.

Voices of reason, ya’ll.
 
sringwal said:
I’m sorry, but it is mind blowing that you are discussing intellect, without acknowledging that, the way things are going now, J.D. Vance is going to be the voice of reason and intelligence in the Trump administration.

Kamala is more intelligent than any of the names seriously being bandied about for any position in Trump’s cabinet. For this reason, more than any other, you should be concerned. These are not “good faith” people, and they are neither intelligent, nor competent.

And you are putting that man in charge surrounded by those people who are incredibly unprepared to do those jobs, and you expect exactly what to happen?

This is the best he can do? Either because everyone else said “no,” or because he is arrogant enough not to care (or, god forbid, the third option, that he really does think that they are as good as anyone else is for the job, because he still doesn’t understand what each job entails).

Really?

Really.

Mind blowing.
Click to expand...
ok, kamala not more intelligent than rubio, hegseth, Wiles, musk, ramaswammy, or gaetz. Not nearly as competent as those 6, plus homan, noem, and gabbard. Why do i say that? Everyone of them can conduct an intelligent interview without having to be treated like a child and everyone of them can speak in coherent sentences. Gabbard tied her in knots during the 2020 debates. Noem and homan are/were actually great at their jobs.

Don't take the above to mean I think that is an all-star lineup. I have serious reservations about some of them but no credible person can listen to harris speak / conduct an interview and look at her performance as VP and during her campaign and say this is an incredibly sharp and competent individual. She was woefully incapable of being potus. She is incredibly adept at timing and taking advantage of positions given to her. She was vp from wokeness and she was the dem nominee because of the box that wokeness put the dnc in.
 
Callatoroy said:
ok, kamala not more intelligent than rubio, hegseth, Wiles, musk, ramaswammy, or gaetz. Not nearly as competent as those 6, plus homan, noem, and gabbard. Why do i say that? Everyone of them can conduct an intelligent interview without having to be treated like a child and everyone of them can speak in coherent sentences. Gabbard tied her in knots during the 2020 debates. Noem and homan are/were actually great at their jobs.

Don't take the above to mean I think that is an all-star lineup. I have serious reservations about some of them but no credible person can listen to harris speak / conduct an interview and look at her performance as VP and during her campaign and say this is an incredibly sharp and competent individual. She was woefully incapable of being potus. She is incredibly adept at timing and taking advantage of positions given to her. She was vp from wokeness and she was the dem nominee because of the box that wokeness put the dnc in.
Click to expand...
You almost fooled me into thinking you were making a serious, albeit misguided, attempt at a point, but that last sentence betrayed you.

But go look at the lexile level for their speeches and here. Come back to me. Then we can talk.
 
Last edited:
Like, I don’t know how you read that chart, calla, but the implications are bad for your side, no matter how you take it.
 
sringwal said:
You almost fooled me into thinking you were making a serious, albeit misguided, attempt at a point, but that last sentence betrayed you.

But go look at the lexile level for their speeches and here. Come back to me. Then we can talk.
Click to expand...
How is the last sentence incorrect?
 
sringwal said:
Like, I don’t know how you read that chart, calla, but the implications are bad for your side, no matter how you take it.
Click to expand...
I have something better than a chart. I have proof of her ineptitude and ineffectiveness through her performance of her job and her speaking on camera. That just trumps a chart. Real life performance > charts.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top