Welcome to our community

Be apart of something great, join today!

Register Log in

Why Did Republicans Abandon Conservatism?

  • Thread starter Thread starter CFordUNC
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies: 292
  • Views: 6K
  • Politics 
Ramrouser said:
Sigh - everything is racism.
Click to expand...
You just gave us a list of the stuff that you didn't like from Obama. It was overwhelmingly a list of white identity grievance. Why shouldn't we conclude that it's racism when you are holding up a blinking neon sign telling us it is? Let's revisit that list:

* Proposed overhaul of nation's gun laws [LOL, this didn't happen]
* Proposed path to citizenship for 11M illegal immigrants [white grievance]
* Lois Lerner of his Administration ADMITS in a speech to the ABA that the IRS targets conservative groups [did not happen; was not true; just grievance]
* "Travon Marton could have been me." - [white grievance -- my God, he expressed empathy with a victim of lynching!]
* Reid implements the "nuclear option" limiting R's ability to filibuster judges [this is not remotely leftist]
* Iran deal - laid the groundwork for Oct 7th. [LOL]
* "I've got a pen and and I've got a phone" [no idea what this is about, but it certainly doesn't seem like a threat to the Republic]
* Secures release of traitor Bergdahl for 5 Taliban commanders [Trump freed 5000 Taliban prisoners and you don't say anything bad about that]
* Defers deportations for 4M illegal aliens [white grievance]
* Plans to normalize relations with Cuba [white grievance]
* vetoes Keystone pipeline [again your understanding of the law is comical for someone claiming to be a lawyer]

Notably absent from your list of complaints is anything that actually makes a difference to your life or anyone's life. Unless dignity for minorities affects your life, which I suspect strongly it does because it makes you unhappy.

See, my list of complaints about W are about incredibly big macro failures. He lied us into a disastrous war; failed to get Osama; and collapsed the world financial system. Those are significant. The complaints about Trump are similarly macro. What you've given is a list of absolute trivialities that have only one thing in common, and you've blown that nonsense up into the idea that Obama was some radical. Your dad probably thought MLK was a communist for exactly the same reason.
 
W did have one stand out moment. As the WSJ put it.

There could hardly have been a more indelicate gaffe. President Bush vowed on Sunday to "rid the world of evil-doers," then cautioned: "This crusade, this war on terrorism, is going to take a while."

I don't think I've ever heard a single statement of so few words so greatly change world opinion for so many people . Then the dumbass doubled down and invaded the wrong damned country.
 
Paine said:
You’re not going to like my answer, but this was always the end goal for conservative intellectuals. Based on everything I know about your politics, you’d be considered a liberal anywhere else.

Conservatism was invented following the French Revolution. They want us to go back to a time of hierarchy and domination. A time when people knew their place. The Enlightenment and liberalism need to be killed in order for that to happen, let alone the New Deal.

People like Reagan were just willing fools.

IIRC, you travel a lot for work. If you’re into podcasts, check out Know Your Enemy. It is a podcast about conservative intellectual history. Download a few episodes and listen on the plane if you’re able; I think you’d get a lot out of it.
Click to expand...
Is that podcast by Matthew Sitman?
 
CFordUNC said:
That all makes a ton of sense. I think from my perspective what has been the most difficult thing to stomach is the hypocrisy and inconsistency of today's Republican supporters. I know it's a popular refrain to say "I didn't leave the party, the party left me" or some variation of that. I don't think that's entirely true in my case- I definitely left the party because I've become more liberal in my views on several things, but I do think that is it way more true that the Republican Party moved much, much further away from me (and classical conservatism) than I moved away.
Click to expand...
We've seemed to follow very similar political paths. I agree with everything you have posted so far. It's easy to become more liberal when you care about other people.
 
superrific said:
You just gave us a list of the stuff that you didn't like from Obama. It was overwhelmingly a list of white identity grievance. Why shouldn't we conclude that it's racism when you are holding up a blinking neon sign telling us it is? Let's revisit that list:

* Proposed overhaul of nation's gun laws [LOL, this didn't happen]
* Proposed path to citizenship for 11M illegal immigrants [white grievance]
* Lois Lerner of his Administration ADMITS in a speech to the ABA that the IRS targets conservative groups [did not happen; was not true; just grievance]
* "Travon Marton could have been me." - [white grievance -- my God, he expressed empathy with a victim of lynching!]
* Reid implements the "nuclear option" limiting R's ability to filibuster judges [this is not remotely leftist]
* Iran deal - laid the groundwork for Oct 7th. [LOL]
* "I've got a pen and and I've got a phone" [no idea what this is about, but it certainly doesn't seem like a threat to the Republic]
* Secures release of traitor Bergdahl for 5 Taliban commanders [Trump freed 5000 Taliban prisoners and you don't say anything bad about that]
* Defers deportations for 4M illegal aliens [white grievance]
* Plans to normalize relations with Cuba [white grievance]
* vetoes Keystone pipeline [again your understanding of the law is comical for someone claiming to be a lawyer]
Click to expand...
Ramrouser is a good example of the radicalization of Republicans. So much of this list is either things that didn't really happen (but he was told it did on Fox News or OAN or Breitbart or wherever) and the others are things that are considered "far left" because they are to the left of Mitt Romney.

It's sad what the Republican Party has come to when they were, at one time, very much a party with ideals and an intellectual wing.
 
Some answers to the OP’s Question can be found here.
If you’re not familiar with Canadian psychology professor Bob Altemeyer and his empirical studies on Authoritarianism, you should be:
 
Last edited:
SnoopRob said:
Ramrouser is a good example of the radicalization of Republicans.
Click to expand...
Maybe, or maybe they have always been like this. I mean, they mouth words like "I'm against all the debt and spending" but there's absolutely no outrage there. Whenever one of our Pubs gets angry, they don't talk about that. It's always border and trans. Their actions betray them. They make very clear what is most important to them. Then they complain when we connect the dots. LOL.
 
ZenMode said:
There are two approaches to things like wealth and income. Conservatives, to varying degrees, don't want government interference.so, So, they don't support unions. Some might go as far as not supporting any kind of minimum wage. That is not the same as saying the GOAL of conservatism is "The rich should get richer", even if that is the end result in some situations.

Conservatism also is not toxic hate for minorities, the poor, women, etc. Conservatism is essentially not creating laws or policy favoring people based on the amount of melanin in your skin or not creating laws or policy to address an issue that is non-existent; the misogyny-based wage gap between men and women.

BTW, Republicans do the same crap with their demonization of the INTENT behind liberal policies.
Click to expand...
So, you believe the wage gap for women is non existent?

And you believe that there weren't reasons to have affirmative action laws? Those were driven by mistreatment, unfair practices in hiring, and unequal pay and treatment in the work place.

The goal of the current conservatives is that the rich get richer, the leadership just tries to keep the minions from knowing.
 
superrific said:
Maybe, or maybe they have always been like this. I mean, they mouth words like "I'm against all the debt and spending" but there's absolutely no outrage there. Whenever one of our Pubs gets angry, they don't talk about that. It's always border and trans. Their actions betray them. They make very clear what is most important to them. Then they complain when we connect the dots. LOL.
Click to expand...
True, they bitch about the debt and spending, but the don't look at the history of which party increases the debt the most in the modern era (since Reagan).
 
superrific said:
You just gave us a list of the stuff that you didn't like from Obama. It was overwhelmingly a list of white identity grievance. Why shouldn't we conclude that it's racism when you are holding up a blinking neon sign telling us it is? Let's revisit that list:

* Proposed overhaul of nation's gun laws [LOL, this didn't happen]
* Proposed path to citizenship for 11M illegal immigrants [white grievance]
* Lois Lerner of his Administration ADMITS in a speech to the ABA that the IRS targets conservative groups [did not happen; was not true; just grievance]
* "Travon Marton could have been me." - [white grievance -- my God, he expressed empathy with a victim of lynching!]
* Reid implements the "nuclear option" limiting R's ability to filibuster judges [this is not remotely leftist]
* Iran deal - laid the groundwork for Oct 7th. [LOL]
* "I've got a pen and and I've got a phone" [no idea what this is about, but it certainly doesn't seem like a threat to the Republic]
* Secures release of traitor Bergdahl for 5 Taliban commanders [Trump freed 5000 Taliban prisoners and you don't say anything bad about that]
* Defers deportations for 4M illegal aliens [white grievance]
* Plans to normalize relations with Cuba [white grievance]
* vetoes Keystone pipeline [again your understanding of the law is comical for someone claiming to be a lawyer]

Notably absent from your list of complaints is anything that actually makes a difference to your life or anyone's life. Unless dignity for minorities affects your life, which I suspect strongly it does because it makes you unhappy.

See, my list of complaints about W are about incredibly big macro failures. He lied us into a disastrous war; failed to get Osama; and collapsed the world financial system. Those are significant. The complaints about Trump are similarly macro. What you've given is a list of absolute trivialities that have only one thing in common, and you've blown that nonsense up into the idea that Obama was some radical. Your dad probably thought MLK was a communist for exactly the same reason.
Click to expand...
Awfully convenient to simply label everything conservatives support as "white grievance." So I don't want 10.5B people flooding into the country illegally and that's racism? Cuba normalization, racism? Screaming racism from the mountaintops for literally every issue conservatives support is soo 2012. Nobody buys that anymore and conservatives no long cower in fear of being accused of it since the card has been played so often. Even black and Hispanic men are trending towards the GOP.

Not making a difference in anyone's life?; tell that to the family of Laken Riley. Guess they're racists too.
 
CFordUNC said:
Appreciate the response and the back-and-forth on this. Also appreciate the questions- they're totally fair.

I wouldn't say that I feel that I've had any major "political conversion." I've absolutely moved leftward on several policy issues, but my moving leftward simply took me out of "hard core conservatism"- I was previously anti-gay marriage, anti-abortion, and anti-immigration as my primary political positions- into something that is a lot more centrist, but would still be considered solidly conservative in every other part of the globe. If the political ideology scale is 0-100 with 0 being extreme far left and 100 being extreme far right, I'd reckon I went from somewhere in the 70-80 range in high school and college, to probably the 45-55 range these days. I wouldn't have any problem whatsoever labeling myself a liberal if I thought that I was liberal. I don't see 'liberal' or 'conservative' as pejoratives and don't think less of anyone for being one or the other. For example, the vast majority of what John Fetterman says and a lot of the stances that he takes resonate with me.

As far as why I turned against Trump, I'd say it was a combination of things. I was initially offput by his comments in the aftermath of the tragedy in Charlottesville in 2017. The in 2018, I was even more offput by his comments disparaging American intelligence personnel and military members at the 2018 United States-Russia Summit in Helsinki. I still voted mostly Republican in the 2018 midterms. The last straws for me were in 2020: first with his behavior in the early onset of the COVID-19 pandemic in January, February, March, and April 2020. I thought that his words and his actions were completely beneath a POTUS and that he was sorely lacking the kind of leadership ability that is required of any POTUS in any national and global emergency. Second, his conduct in the aftermath of the George Floyd murder in June 2020 was reprehensible, specifically in using military personnel to physically assault and clear a crowd of protestors with rubber bullets and batons so that he could stage a photo op with an (upside down" Bible in front of St. John's Church. I was already leaning heavily into not supporting his reelection in November of that year, but that day in June sealed the deal for me. It was an unforgivable line to cross.

So, all of that to say, it wasn't some sudden and immediate light that came on for me where one day I was pro-Trump and the next I was anti-Trump. It was a slow, methodical move over the course of his first term, which then rapidly accelerated in 2020. If he had risen to the occasion and proven himself to be a presidential leader during the pandemic and during the race riots during the summer of 2020, I could have likely been convinced to hold my nose and vote for a second term. I'm not sure how long you've been around tis ZZLP community, but if you were around in, say, 2015-2018 or so, you'd have seen that I was actually one of the folks on here who would, if not outright defend Trump, would hand-wave or try to explain away his words and actions. I got taken behind the woodshed on plenty of occasions by plenty of longtime posters here with whom I now find myself aligned.

I'm sure that there are plenty of Republicans who, as you said (and perhaps you are even one of them), "hate Trump, with a passion, but still held their nose and voted for him last November." I definitely don't think that 77 million voters absolutely loved Donald Trump. But the difference between myself- as a former Republican- and those current Republicans, is that for me, I care much more about the overall prosperity and well-being of our country than I care about having to hold my nose and vote for "my party." I'm not nearly partisan enough to care about which party holds power as long as the power is being used to genuinely make America stronger, safer, and more prosperous for all Americans. I personally do not believe that Donald Trump and the current GOP are doing those things- I also understand that you probably very strongly disagree with me on that.
Click to expand...
Thanks for the insightful response.

I'm a regular poster on the IC sports boards but I never posted on IC's ZZLP - only lurked occasionally.
 
ZenMode said:
Because pretending to be a mind reader, and ascribing intent when you are in no position to do so, contributes to our current political divide.

Was affirmative action in liberal-run Ivy League universities INTENDED to deny some smart, high-scoring Asians the ability to go to those schools? If it is, then Dems are all a bunch of evil, racist SOBs, right?
Click to expand...
These are not even related.
 
Ramrouser said:
Awfully convenient to simply label everything conservatives support as "white grievance." So I don't want 10.5B people flooding into the country illegally and that's racism? Cuba normalization, racism? Screaming racism from the mountaintops for literally every issue conservatives support is soo 2012. Nobody buys that anymore and conservatives no long cower in fear of being accused of it since the card has been played so often. Even black and Hispanic men are trending towards the GOP.

Not making a difference in anyone's life?; tell that to the family of Laken Riley. Guess they're racists too.
Click to expand...
1. 10.5 billion people?
2. Your motivations are obvious. You don't care about the illegality. If you cared at all about legality, you would be up in arms about Trump running roughshod over the constitution. You'd certainly be up in arms about the corrupt deal with Eric Adams that caused 7 attorneys (including conservative ones) to resign rather than sign motions unethically.

But you don't care about that. All you care about is the brown people coming across the border. That and trans. It's 90% of what you post. And there's no reasonable view that immigration is a huge problem.

3. I'm not talking about racism for every issue conservatives support. I'm talking about the racism in the specific issues you crow about. If you were here raising holy hell about the debt, that would be reasonable and not racist. But that's not what you're doing. You almost never mention it except in passing. There are plenty of things that conservatives can worry about that aren't racist. It's just that you don't talk about them.

4. I'm only going to explain this once more, since I've already explained it. When immigrants come into the country, if their crime rate is lower than the natives (it is), then their presence is making everyone's lives SAFER. Your odds of being a victim of violent crime are decreased by the presence of illegal immigrants (as they will be victims of crimes more than perps of crime, that's just statistics).

Think about what you're saying. The number of murders in this country used to be way, way lower than it is today. Per capita, not. But in absolute numbers, yes. In particular, there were way more incidents of crime as the baby boomers became adults. By your logic, we'd be safer if the baby boomers had never been born. Does that make any sense? It does not.

That you are willing to swallow nonsense arguments about crime rates is another mark against you. Maybe it's stupidity and not just racism. Personally, I think you don't really understand probability, but you're more than willing to latch onto stupidity because it reinforces your point that migrants = bad. And that is, I'm sorry to say, a racist view. Especially since you are turning a blind eye to rampant criminal conduct when it's committed by your side, or your boss for that matter.
 
finesse said:
Then explain to me why conservatives try to limit opportunities and dictate social behavior that is injurious and limiting to others? That is anything but hands off.
Click to expand...
True, conservatives claim to want freedoms, then they work to pass laws that limit freedom.

But that's fine as long as the limitations align with the cults worldview.
 
ZenMode said:
For example...
Click to expand...
A Man can only marry a woman.
A pregnant woman doesn't have the right to certain medical treatments.
A trans person doesn't have the right to certain medical treatments.
Now we're seeing things like a doctor doesn't have the right to recommend vaccinations in Louisiana.
They are for censorship of books, instead of letting people have the freedom to choose what to read.

There are more, but you know that.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top