2024 Pre-Election Political Polls | POLL - Trump would have had 7 point lead over Biden

  • Thread starter Thread starter nycfan
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies: 6K
  • Views: 144K
  • Politics 
“trump invokes his long held fascination with genetics”
The state of fascination requires a level of curiosity and aesthetic appreciation (indeed, fascination may be the seed of aesthetic appreciation in children) that Trump manifestly does not possess..
 
I'm glad the polling is so close. I'd even wager to say that polling will keep everyone alert and focused on voting. If huge leads drove complacency, that could only help Trump and I would prefer we avoid the whole 2016 scenario. Although with early voting showing strong turnout, new voter registrations showing record turnout, and significant fundraising for Kamala, I like the direction we're in.

Add in Republican's enthusiasm waning relative to Democrats and I'm leaning towards a more hopeful conclusion to this election.
You give me hope.
 
I’m hoping it’s a red tilting poll, because the swing state general polls are scary.

IMG_2547.jpeg
Polling averages. Look to the averages.

538 gives Kamala a 53% chance to win today. That's down from . . . 57% at her peak a week or two ago. That's not significant movement. It's just noise.
 

 
I know nothing about Bouzy but isn't that Cenk dude one of the weirder and least reliable lefties on the internet?

BTW early voting numbers mean nothing, especially when they are only broken out by party.
They mean SOMETHING about trends and potential enthusiasm

But not a forecast of what's to come
 
According to NBC News, as of October 9th 72% of the 266,000 early votes cast in Pennsylvania were cast by Democrats.
 
I know nothing about Bouzy but isn't that Cenk dude one of the weirder and least reliable lefties on the internet?

BTW early voting numbers mean nothing, especially when they are only broken out by party.
Cenk has been wrong on his predictions more times than one can count. He drastically overvalues the impact that far left progressives have on the party, and also drastically undervalues their ability to compromise when faced with an existential threat like Donald Trump.
 
According to NBC News, as of October 9th 72% of the 266,000 early votes cast in Pennsylvania were cast by Democrats.
In related news, most Dems in PA live in cities. Weird Trump conspiracy musings aside, that's really what early voting numbers reflect. Folks in the sticks don't need to vote early because there are only like 200 people at their polling location to begin with. People in the Burgh or Philly vote early so they don't have to wait in potentially long lines and/or trudge through what can be unpleasant weather (especially in Pgh, according to my long time friend who has lived there for 20 years).
 
In related news, most Dems in PA live in cities. Weird Trump conspiracy musings aside, that's really what early voting numbers reflect. Folks in the sticks don't need to vote early because there are only like 200 people at their polling location to begin with. People in the Burgh or Philly vote early so they don't have to wait in potentially long lines and/or trudge through what can be unpleasant weather (especially in Pgh, according to my long time friend who has lived there for 20 years).
Maybe

I vote early to get it over with. I wouldn't make assumptions. There's some truth of what you said but then you would see very similar % on most cycles
 
Back
Top