2024 Pre-Election Political Polls | POLL - Trump would have had 7 point lead over Biden

[WaynetheDrain]

“You merely adopted the fascism. I was born in it, molded by it.”

 

[WaynetheDrain]

How did they get to over 100% voting? 55.6+44.6=100.2. Even with rounding that doesn't make sense. I think I've discovered Trump's next fraud theory for Georgia.

That’s all the Democrats voting multiple times. Obvi.

 

[finesse]

How did they get to over 100% voting? 55.6+44.6=100.2. Even with rounding that doesn't make sense. I think I've discovered Trump's next fraud theory for Georgia.

What if it were the % of registered voters in each group? Trump might not buy it.

 

[nycfan]

Echelon’s numbers are much better for Trump in swing states.

 

[lawtig02]

Echelon’s numbers are much better for Trump in swing states.

It's a red waver. Not the worst of them, but it's definitely right leaning.

 

[CFordUNC]

Now THIS is my kind of hopium, where a 319-219 EC victory is deemed "certain" and a 417-85 ED victory is considered "possible"

 

[WaynetheDrain]

Echelon’s numbers are much better for Trump in swing states.

Echelon has Trump +6 (!) in Pennsylvania. Supposedly they are pretty highly rated, but that margin is stretching the limits of credibility.

 

[WaynetheDrain]

Now THIS is my kind of hopium, where a 319-219 EC victory is deemed "certain" and a 417-85 ED victory is considered "possible"

That’s the kind of Hopium that would make Christopher Bouzy blush.

 

[aGDevil2k]

Now THIS is my kind of hopium, where a 319-219 EC victory is deemed "certain" and a 417-85 ED victory is considered "possible"

We found Bouzy a wifey

Edit - nevermind Houle is a man.

 

[uncjhodges]

Echelon has Trump +6 (!) in Pennsylvania. Supposedly they are pretty highly rated, but that margin is stretching the limits of credibility.

Are these people “highly rated” based on results from last time or methodology and seriousness. If it’s based on 2020 results, well it just means the right wing polls are rated higher bc the miss was to the right and they were putting their thumbs on the scales. Rating polls based on “results” when they aren’t a predicting tool and have large margins of error is so dumb

 

[CFordUNC]

 

[Focker]

 

[Icky Mettle]

Hmm. Not sure what to think of those polls. On the surface, they look a bit concerning.

 

[lawtig02]

Hmm. Not sure what to think of those polls. On the surface, they look a bit concerning.

No, that's generally good news. You'd always prefer to have votes banked before Election Day rather than counting on people to show up then. And Kamala is WAY ahead in terms of votes banked.

 

[superrific]

Hmm. Not sure what to think of those polls. On the surface, they look a bit concerning.

If he is only +10 with yet to vote PA, that's a bad sign for him. He's likely at least 30 points behind in early voting.

 

[superrific]

My son at U of M is reporting a lot of excitement on campus. And he's in the engineering school! My wife's GOP cousin at MSU (which is more conservative) is reporting apathy.

 

[HeelInTheOzarks]

Hmm. Not sure what to think of those polls. On the surface, they look a bit concerning.

This is the companion poll:

 

[CFordUNC]

 

[HeelInTheOzarks]

The fact Nate writes this without apparently any self awareness of how it sounds…

 

[korgguy1971]

His fat ass would never have been able to climb out of Pena Duro.