Welcome to our community

Be apart of something great, join today!

Register Log in

2024 Presidential Election | ELECTION DAY 2024

  • Thread starter Thread starter nycfan
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies: 8K
  • Views: 285K
  • Politics 
superrific said:
Yep, unfiltered bullshit. Clinton didn't cede power, because she had none. Trump didn't cede power either. A failed coup is not the same thing as stepping aside.

Super ignore is on. You're not likely to have many people to talk to any more. Cue up the grievance machine. Waa! Waa! I'm being discriminated against because I have a different viewpoint!! Sure I lie and make ridiculously false claims and try to bait people with trolling bullshit, but that's not why people don't want to talk to me! It's that I think for myself. Waa! Waa!
Click to expand...
I hope you don’t think I’m remotely worried about not being able to interact with you anymore. lol at being such a snowflake you need to use “Super Ignore” on an internet message board about politics.
 
uncgriff said:
Trump claimed the 2016 election was rigged even though he won because he didn't win popular vote.

It's a bullshit comparison.

Super ignore engaged
Click to expand...
It is a bullshit comparison but one made out of ignorance so I will not ignore HY just because he knows little beyond the "news" he gathers from the right wing fever swamp.
 
HeelYeah2012 said:
Obviously both Trump and Clinton ceded power and the world kept turning. But neither one handled the loss the way you’d hope a politician would in a POTUS race. Both of them sowed significant doubt in our election security on the way out.

Point remains, whichever side loses the election in 2024 will raise hell and blame everything except their party’s unwillingness to meet voters where they are.
Click to expand...
Maybe if you didn't love Trump so much you wouldn't have to lie for him so hard.
 
4thgenheel said:
i don't have any state or national candidate campaign signs in my yard, just one for a local county commissioner candidate who is a dem but has lots of bipartisan support. there are actually only 2 campaign signs up in my entire neighborhood, both for local races.

the right is teeming with angry wackos with guns. i don't want to give any of them a reason to give me a second look.
Click to expand...
IMG_0111.jpeg

Oh no! Not the Gravy Seals!
 
With all the garbage political mail the past few weeks, I actually received something very useful today. It is from NC State Board of Elections with info about the statewide judicial candidates.

For those yet to receive it, or tossed it out, I found some very shocking stats in the last few pages. NC has more than 7.6 million registered voters. Here is the breakdown that was very surprising to me.

31.6% registered Dems
29.9% registered Pubs
37.6% unaffiliated.

Now I've been unaffiliated for 5 years now after the Pub party died and sold out to the fraud mad man. And I am sure there are plenty of young people that don't know enough to pick a party, as well as low info and rare voters.

But there is NO WAY that almostv38% are unaffiliated. Not when the state usually votes Red, and certainly not when a criminal fraud con man currently leads the state. It would be an upset, perhaps not a shocking one, but a pretty big upset if Harris wins NC. Only Obama could do it with huge turnout from one side.
 
Kraftyheel89 said:
With all the garbage political mail the past few weeks, I actually received something very useful today. It is from NC State Board of Elections with info about the statewide judicial candidates.

For those yet to receive it, or tossed it out, I found some very shocking stats in the last few pages. NC has more than 7.6 million registered voters. Here is the breakdown that was very surprising to me.

31.6% registered Dems
29.9% registered Pubs
37.6% unaffiliated.

Now I've been unaffiliated for 5 years now after the Pub party died and sold out to the fraud mad man. And I am sure there are plenty of young people that don't know enough to pick a party, as well as low info and rare voters.

But there is NO WAY that almostv38% are unaffiliated. Not when the state usually votes Red, and certainly not when a criminal fraud con man currently leads the state. It would be an upset, perhaps not a shocking one, but a pretty big upset if Harris wins NC. Only Obama could do it with huge turnout from one side.
Click to expand...
the vast majority of unaffiliated voters are closeted partisans who vote for the same party in every election and are just registered UNA.
 
EhringhausSouth said:
Clinton (who I voted for in 2016) did initially push back against the results due to election interference and only conceded after Obama told her to. But it's true, it wasn't close to Trump's tantrum.
Click to expand...
Can you elaborate on this? The race was called in the middle of the night and she conceded the following morning. When was the initial push back against the results prior to her concession?
 
Calheel said:
It is why I stopped Super Ignoring posters. Ignore is good enough and the page navigation is much better.
Click to expand...
Can you elaborate? You're not referring to the fact that there are just people ignored and those that are responding to them also being ignored?
 
Rock said:
Can you elaborate? You're not referring to the fact that there are just people ignored and those that are responding to them also being ignored?
Click to expand...
Not really. You'll have to ask @aGDevil2k, as I don't Super Ignore people any more and cannot specifically speak to the wonkiness issue. I just remember that the board did not function well with SI posts.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top