Only if you could prove it beyond doubt. Even then , you really have to defend the concept of a soul.If you believe that life begins at conception, or heartbeat or brain activity, wouldn't decades of ended human lives, under Roe, be proof of harm?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Only if you could prove it beyond doubt. Even then , you really have to defend the concept of a soul.If you believe that life begins at conception, or heartbeat or brain activity, wouldn't decades of ended human lives, under Roe, be proof of harm?
"science and common sense and legal precedents say that life begins at viability."people believe a lot of dumb shit.
science and common sense and legal precedents say that life begins at viability.
fetus/womb is essentially a parasite/host relationship until viability at which time the fetus should be granted more rights. until then, pregnant women must have bodily autonomy.
there's no citation for the survey...."science and common sense and legal precedents say that life begins at viability."
Biologists from 1,058 academic institutions around the world assessed survey items on when a human's life begins and, overall, 96% (5337 out of 5577) affirmed the fertilization view.
![]()
The Scientific Consensus on When a Human's Life Begins - PubMed
Peer-reviewed journals in the biological and life sciences literature have published articles that represent the biological view that a human's life begins at fertilization ("the fertilization view"). As those statements are typically offered without explanation or citation, the fertilization...pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Can we make that “fuck the MAGAS” like the legend of King Edward II’s demise.It is on the horizon. Their efforts to hurt liberals will inevitably affect all the poor rubes. It might be a year or two, but gutting the middle class, and taking away the only safety nets from the poor, will cause mass chaos. People won't even know who they are fighting, but they will be ready to fight, mark my words. We will accomplish little, but I 100% know that I will take a shit on very specific redneck faces during the chaos. I know who they are, therefore plans are in the works.
Fuck the MAGAts!
I agree that religious people tend to believe that life begins at conception. However, that isn't the only basis for that belief and it doesn't mean that there isn't a scientific basis for the belief.there's no citation for the survey....
acpeds.org
There is nothing scientific in that paper. That's because the question is not scientific at all. It's just a question of labels. There are various tests for whether a statement is scientific, and that paper fails all of them. Is it falsifiable that life begins at conception? No. It would be true of any antecedent stage of an organism, regardless of its properties. Is it verifiable? For the same reason, no. Does it have any predictive value? No. Whether or not the zygote is "alive" tells you nothing about the nature of the zygote, its structure, its maturation process, nothing.![]()
When Human Life Begins - American College of Pediatricians
American College of Pediatricians – March 2017 ABSTRACT: The predominance [...]acpeds.org
An objective, scientific basis (link above) doesn't talk about emotion.
He’s not obtuse. He’s getting you to give him a reach-around handjob. You help him accomplish his goal.How can you be so obtuse?
Well, I don't, and lots of women don't, because they had (and continuing to have) abortions. Keep your beliefs to yourself.If you believe that life begins at conception
By the biological definition, both egg and sperm are alive, so life begins before conception.If you believe that life begins at conception, or heartbeat or brain activity, wouldn't decades of ended human lives, under Roe, be proof of harm?
Exactly.This. I’ve said time and again gt and zen are the most successful trolls in the history of zzlp 1.0 or 2.0. They continually convince well meaning folks to respond with substance, only to very predictably move the goalposts, while constructing a strawman.
I troll trolls. That's my purpose.He’s not obtuse. He’s getting you to give him a reach-around handjob. You help him accomplish his goal.
I've never said, nor do I believe, that life begins at conception.Well, I don't, and lots of women don't, because they had (and continuing to have) abortions. Keep your beliefs to yourself.
I'm not making the argument that life begins at conception. I'm making the argument that when human life begins is subjective.By the biological definition, both egg and sperm are alive, so life begins before conception.
A donated chunk of liver is alive. What rights does it have? Should failure to implant it while still viable result in murder charges?
Then, clearly, no one should interfere in someone else's decision, wouldn't you say? Anything else seems awfully Big Brotherish.I'm not making the argument that life begins at conception. I'm making the argument that when human life begins is subjective.
No matter how many times you post a picture of your cocker spanial, you will always be a useless, trump-loving twat
There is not a single woman on this earth, including your entire family, who is counting on you to advocate for their Healthcare and medical decisionsI'm not making the argument that life begins at conception. I'm making the argument that when human life begins is subjective.
I never said there was.There is not a single woman on this earth, including your entire family, who is counting on you to advocate for their Healthcare and medical decisions
So, you want to legalize murder, because my neighbor decided that life isn't begin until a child can feed itself. I shouldn't interfere, right? I mean, is a child really viable before it can keep itself alive?Then, clearly, no one should interfere in someone else's decision, wouldn't you say? Anything else seems awfully Big Brotherish.
Make your case. You haven't a leg to stand on.So, you want to legalize murder?