Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
He was a sitting President with fairly huge accomplishments Of course he was gonna run
How about monthly pardonsFuture pardons don't exist ... yet. That is some Minority Report shit.
How is this a precedent? Sotomayor already addressed this exact scheme in her dissent, and everybody knows about it anyway.Especially if the SCOTUS remains firm on presidential immunity. Do whatever you want and preemptive pardon everyone on the way out the door.
This is almost certainly not true.Well.....Fauci has his place in history as the first fedeeal government scientist to be pardoned.
What difference? A preemptive pardon is for acts that have occurred, but prosecution for those acts has not yet begun. There are no pardons for conduct that hasn't happened yet.The difference is a pardon for anything you have done versus anything you could do after the pardon
That's what some people on here are talking aboutWhat difference? A preemptive pardon is for acts that have occurred, but prosecution for those acts has not yet begun. There are no pardons for conduct that hasn't happened yet.
I missed that.That's what some people on here are talking about
On the face of these pardons, I'm against them because of the precedent they set and the potential for future abuse.Yeah, complaining about Biden setting negative precedents after Trump 1.0 and now 2.0 is rich. Trump is wrecking pretty much every precedent and tradition set by his predecessors in many areas, and nearly all of what he's doing is negative, imo. If Biden wants to keep people like Fauci safe from being endlessly harassed by Trumpers until the poor man dies then so be it.
On the flip side, do you let your family be harassed and possibly prosecuted for realistically nothing more than being related to you when the Trump propaganda network would vilify Joe Biden and his family anyway?Definitely makes it a lot easier for people to crow about the "Biden crime family" when he felt the need to preemptively pardon his family members. As with the Hunter pardon, I understand his actions as a human being but politically it's just playing right into Trump's hands. Now Trump doesn't have to worry about satisfying the parts of his bloc who actually wanted to prosecute these people, instead he can just say "oh I totally would have prosecuted them if not for the pardons, Joe knew they were guilty so he pardoned them."
That's why I said I understand the pardons as a human being but dislike them politically. I would be tempted to protect my family in that situation too, and maybe I would do it. But candidly the future of our country is more important than whether members of Joe Biden's family are harassed by politically motivated prosecutions. And from a political perspective I think it would be much better to put Trump in the difficult position of pursuing what I suspect would largely be farcical and unpopular prosecutions of the extended Biden family, or having to explain why he isn't doing it. Now he is not only spared that dilemma, but can turn the whole thing to his advantage.On the flip side, do you let your family be harassed and possibly prosecuted for realistically nothing more than being related to you when the Trump propaganda network would vilify Joe Biden and his family anyway?
Again, these are not pardons that anyone should want to see, but Trump and his devotion to seeking retribution has made them necessary.
Imo, the way the whole country has dumped on Biden after the job he (or the administration he picked) did, I don't blame him for not taking another hit. He's had enough of them in his life and enough of them have been directly to his family that I understand why he would do it. Politics and country be damned. He's put enough work and pain into the country and his work to walk away the way he wants to.That's why I said I understand the pardons as a human being but dislike them politically. I would be tempted to protect my family in that situation too, and maybe I would do it. But candidly the future of our country is more important than whether members of Joe Biden's family are harassed by politically motivated prosecutions. And from a political perspective I think it would be much better to put Trump in the difficult position of pursuing what I suspect would largely be farcical and unpopular prosecutions of the extended Biden family, or having to explain why he isn't doing it. Now he is not only spared that dilemma, but can turn the whole thing to his advantage.
Asking someone to put their own family at risk for the sake of the country is not an easy ask, or really a fair one. As I said, I don't know what I would do in his position. But in terms of a trolley problem-type analysis, we should all at some level be able to put the interests of the country over the interests of our immediate family.
Yeah, I've about had it with the liberals who are also shitting on Biden. Yes, the election of 2024 was a fucking catastrophe. It doesn't make it right to dump on a lifelong public service who has served with integrity and devotion to country, and inherited probably the biggest mess that any president ever has (save possibly for Lincoln, depending on what you mean by inherited). He did a pretty good job all told.Imo, the way the whole country has dumped on Biden after the job he (or the administration he picked) did, I don't blame him for not taking another hit. He's had enough of them in his life and enough of them have been directly to his family that I understand why he would do it. Politics and country be damned. He's put enough work and pain into the country and his work to walk away the way he wants to.