I think it's odd for the state to have a Christmas tree or trees at all. What would be the difference if it were a mental health center? They deal with those all the time. What if it was an evangelical church? In my mind, they are carriers of a mental disorder. What makes this tree different other than your prejudices?I think my first comment was on point. I think it's incredibly odd for the state to have a Christmas tree focused on sexual attraction and a mental disorder.
Properly, all the trees should be treated the same. Is it clear that happened? Was there something other than the cause alone that made this different? If you were to make your objection from that POV that there was a demonstrable difference your opinion might actually be worth more than as a bad example.