Carolina Fever
Inconceivable Member
- Messages
- 3,823
The Pubs let it happen and allowed Trump to be elected again because they care more about themselves than the country and democracy.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The existential "threat to our democracy" is Trump and his delusional supporters.I just don't think it was the existential "threat to our democracy" that some claim.
Amen.Jan. 6 Has Taken On a Whole New Meaning
The failures of the past four years are crystal clear, yet hard to fathom.
![]()
Four Years Later, Jan. 6 Has Taken On a Whole New Meaning. It’s Hard to Fathom.
Trump’s return is on wildly different terms.slate.com
"...The reality settling over the United States today is that the insurrectionists outmaneuvered both Democratic leaders and America’s antiquated laws and institutions, and now they will have an extended opportunity to show us all what we’ve won.
That this grim moment seemed unimaginable four years ago almost goes without saying. Even some Republicans leaders and commentators who had spent four years laundering Trump’s vile indecency and explaining away each new assault on the country’s norms and institutions were momentarily chastened.
Inside the Capitol, the insurrection was violent and terrifying and could have resulted in multiple members of Congress getting killed or wounded. But while it was shocking to watch, it was also bumbling and rudderless and rather obviously doomed.
From the outside, it mostly looked like angry fans storming and looting the field and the clubhouse after their favorite team lost the Super Bowl—bad, but also not likely to change the final score.
...The mad king, alone in the alabaster castle from which he would soon be evicted, was isolated and desperate. The House Select Committee to investigate Jan. 6 and the many indictments related to it then showed just how responsible Trump was for it all. And yet somehow, over the course of Biden’s four soporific years in the White House, Trump managed not only to get away with every last bit of it, but to in effect finish what he started on the Ellipse that day—with boosts from our collapsing legal system, an amnesia-riddled electorate, and contrarian broligarchs who saw in the declining, erratic Trump a unique opportunity to smash any remaining obstacles to their A.I. and cryptocurrency get-rich schemes.
Books will be written about how this transpired, but it’s not actually that complicated.
Virtually every person tasked with bringing Trump and his allies to justice for the effort to overturn the 2020 election trusted that some other institutions could get it done.
... The effort to rehabilitate and reinstall Trump in power got a generous assist from the GOP’s ill-gotten 6–3 supermajority on an off-the-rails Supreme Court, which not only rescued Trump from the legal consequences of his actions but declared American presidents to be all but immortal. Perhaps Chief Justice John Roberts, who was “shaken by the adverse public reaction to his decision” in the Trump immunity case, according to CNN’s Joan Biskupic, may have thought that the electorate would reject Trump, allowing prosecutions to move forward on the much more narrow terms the Supreme Court appeared to allow. But that’s not the path that the voters chose.
The people tasked with eliminating the threat that Donald Trump poses to American constitutional democracy were ultimately more worried about the perception of procedural fairness than about getting the job done.
McConnell thought it was unfair and perhaps unconstitutional to convict a former president.
Biden and Garland worried that an overly aggressive approach from the White House and the Department of Justice would delegitimize the justice system.
Roberts, ostensibly concerned with his legacy and the court’s legitimacy, worried that failing to grant broad immunity to presidents would open the door to tit-for-tat prosecutions of outgoing presidents.
Meanwhile, Trump and his allies whined incessantly about “weaponization” of the Justice Department anyway and used by now standard and predictable Trump-era propaganda techniques to invert responsibility for Jan. 6—anointing the rioters political prisoners and convincing rank-and-file Republicans that the whole thing was a partisan farce."
No one argues that SOME of the protestors on J6 got out of hand and attacked police. Same for the ones who vandalized property. Those people should be punished. But 99% of the people in the Capital, and on the grounds, were peaceful and respectful. The Dems and the media, however, insist upon labeling all of them (and Republicans who voted for Trump) insurrectionists.
In 2020, ya'll and the media went out of your way to piously instruct the rest of us that most of the George Floyd/BLM rioters were "peaceful" and that a few knuckle heads or "outside agitators" shouldn't diminish the protest. My Atlanta mayor said these folks simply needed to "let off some steam." I also don't recall this board calling for the Palestinian "protestors" who converged on the US Capitol and in the rotunda interrupting Congressional proceedings to be arrested. Cops were attacked during that protest as well.
J6 was a bad day no question. I just don't think it was the existential "threat to our democracy" that some claim.
According to Trump logic, Kamala Harris, being Vice POTUS, can refuse to certify the election, making her President. Let's go Kamala!So certification will begin in about 45 minutes.
How many Dems have gathered on the mall to prepare for a storming of the Capitol Building ?
Did Vice President Harris deliver a fiery speech encouraging her supporters to go down to the Capitol and fight like hell to avoid not having a country anymore ?
The existential "threat to our democracy" is Trump and his delusional supporters.
So certification will begin in about 45 minutes.
How many Dems have gathered on the mall to prepare for a storming of the Capitol Building ?
Did Vice President Harris deliver a fiery speech encouraging her supporters to go down to the Capitol and fight like hell to avoid not having a country anymore ?
TBF, there have been liberal and Democratic deniers from time to time over the years (Bush v Gore, less so but some for Bush v Kerry, some for Clinton v. Trump), but they've mostly gotten sidelong looks and sighs from the large majority of Dems, not traction and power.Of course not. As Hakeem Jeffries so eloquently put it. There are no election deniers on our side.
First election of a Republican a Dem has not challenged since 1988Of course not. As Hakeem Jeffries so eloquently put it. There are no election deniers on our side.
TBF, unlike the 2020 election, there was some legitimate controversy about those three elections.TBF, there have been liberal and Democratic deniers from time to time over the years (Bush v Gore, less so but some for Bush v Kerry, some for Clinton v. Trump), but they've mostly gotten sidelong looks and sighs from the large majority of Dems, not traction and power.
Department of JusticeBy whom and for what should they be investigated? Be specific.
Stick to divorce lawDepartment of Justice
Conspiracy against Rights. 18 USC 241.
Sunny Hostin, on the View today, just compared J6 to “WW II, the Holocaust and chattel slavery.” No overreaction there.Kellyanne Conway: "For liberals, every day is January 6th" "Worse than Pearl Harbor, JFK assassination and 9/11" combined.
In what serious way have Democrats challenged and tried to overturn the election of a Republican? Gore lost Florida by less than 600 votes out of nearly 6 million cast and certainly had the right to ask for recounts - which were stopped by the Republican majority on the Supreme Court, 5-4. And there was no violence associated with that election, despite its extreme closeness. What did Democrats seriously do in 2004 and 2016 (or this year) to stop the Republican from taking office? You're comparing apples and oranges here.First election of a Republican a Dem has not challenged since 1988
I am continually amazed he passed the bar exam.This Buckhead lawyer sure doesn’t seem to know a ton about law.
This is what she said:Sunny Hostin, on the View today, just compared J6 to “WW II, the Holocaust and chattel slavery.” No overreaction there.
I was about to jokingly call you out on the typo there, until I looked it up and discovered that "equivalation" is actually a word. Seems improbable, but multiple sources confirmed. Message boards at their best. I was planning on some snark and I ended up learning something instead.Comparison =/= equivalation, which is a logical concept you seem to be struggling with on this topic.