Mass Deportation and Immigration Catch-All | CIA using drones to spy on Mexican drug cartels

  • Thread starter Thread starter nycfan
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies: 1K
  • Views: 33K
  • Politics 
I will also add that I think part of the disconnect in the conversation is the assumption that many of us only started hating Trump when he first ran for president.

Personally, I have felt like he represented the worst part of America since the days on Lifestyles of The Rich and Famous in the late 1980s. I was a small child at the time, but it was apparent then who he was, and everything he has done since then has only cemented the view I forms of him at the time.

I have said it before, but he has always struck me as a Mark Twain caricature come to life, 150 years later. He and Musk are essentially the Duke and the King made flesh.
 
I'm genuinely perplexed by your change in my perceived level of radicalization of your comments about trump over the last several months (since the election). Is it you hate the man? You hate his agenda? You hate both? Do you hate the man more than the agenda or vice versa? While your comments gave a clear picture that you didn't like trump, they were far more tame. Did you believe kamala was going to win and you wouldn't be faced with the current reality? There could be discussion without it getting sidetracked by trump hatred. He didn't get between the differences on policy.
That’s not a bad question (although it wasn’t directed at me.)

I have loathed the man since I lived in NY in the early 80’s and he was pretty much a joke around the city (he was a foil for Howard Stern and Grayson Carter was dubbing him a “short-fingered vulgarian.”) The notion that this buffoon would someday be serious political figure was (and still is) absurd.

His agenda is cruelty. His primary goal seems to be to annoy and frustrate people who disagree with him. He appoints people who are wholly unfit for their jobs. He is bent on destroying the institutions and systems that make our government work because they stand between him and his goal of using his position to personally enrich himself. He derailed a bipartisan immigration bill for political expediency. He doesn’t want immigration reform, he wants immigration elimination (or at least he did until Elon Musk, another wholly despicable human being, convinced him that bringing in substantially more degreed tech workers without typical workplace safeguards and professional mobility would be beneficial to Musk and his buddies.) Remember when he was going to introduce his replacement plan for Obamacare? How about when he was going to release his tax returns as soon as his audit was completed? Now he has a hare-brained idea that tariffs are the solution to all the economic problems of the country.

In other words I hate his lack of agenda, he just has a jigsaw puzzle of unconnected dots that he hopes somebody smarter than him can develop into policy. His agenda is grievance and retribution. Gulf of America? His agenda is trolling.

I hope that one day you figure it out like so many other conservatives/former Republicans who post here have done over the past ten years.
 
1. I have thought Trump is one of the worst humans on the face of the planet since long before he was a serious candidate for president. I see him as the absolute antithesis of everything my faith teaches me is desirable. Or, to bring it closer to home, he’s the opposite of what I want my son to be.

2. Trump is BY FAR the biggest reason I left the Republican Party. I literally cannot imagine supporting a party that embraces him.

3. There is no conservative policy being discussed in the US today. MAGA is about as far from conservative as you can get. It’s basically anarchistic. Dems have embraced a lot of conservatism, but there’s no true conservative policy discussion to be had. And that’s almost entirely because Trump has hijacked it.
Fair enough. I'm not questioning your opinions and respect your views as you stated them. I believe for whatever reason you are sincere and am in no way attempting to change your opinions.

1. we are in complete agreement. I want my sons to be the opposite of trump.

2. I gave up on my naive belief that character mattered for potus during the Clinton years. It was difficult for me and I fought it but it seemingly didn't matter to others so I learned to accept it and focus way more on what the candidate was planning to do vs the candidate. I'm not saying i'm right and you are wrong. Just that I had to look at what direction I thought was right for the country and nothing else. Would I like to have a potus with Carter's ethics and decency? Certainly but I don't think we have had that since W (and I struggle with the idea he knew there were no WMD in iraq.) That is a debate for another thread.

3. We view MAGA differently. I see it as the most radical supporters (10% of his votes). I see the rest as people like me who see him for what he is but see it as the vehicle to restore what's important to me (us). I view conservatism in terms of real world issues. Not broad terms that can be manipulated or applied to any argument. I don't see that trump has hijacked any of the conservative issues that seemed important in the election.

These comments weren't intended to debate. You gave me a foundation for what you believe and I did the same. Understanding why someone believes what they do is generally helpful.
 
I will also add that I think part of the disconnect in the conversation is the assumption that many of us only started hating Trump when he first ran for president.

Personally, I have felt like he represented the worst part of America since the days on Lifestyles of The Rich and Famous in the late 1980s. I was a small child at the time, but it was apparent then who he was, and everything he has done since then has only cemented the view I forms of him at the time.

I have said it before, but he has always struck me as a Mark Twain caricature come to life, 150 years later. He and Musk are essentially the Duke and the King made flesh.
Agree completely. And I’ll just add, conservative Christianity’s embrace and absorption of Trump has been the most horrifying and infuriating experience of my adult life. I had started to move away from you before, but how DARE you embrace a man who is the exact opposite of everything you preached to me that I should be and do. May endless shame be heaped on the heads of those who call themselves Christian, but support this man who nails Jesus to the cross a thousand times every day.
 
Fair enough. I'm not questioning your opinions and respect your views as you stated them. I believe for whatever reason you are sincere and am in no way attempting to change your opinions.

1. we are in complete agreement. I want my sons to be the opposite of trump.

2. I gave up on my naive belief that character mattered for potus during the Clinton years. It was difficult for me and I fought it but it seemingly didn't matter to others so I learned to accept it and focus way more on what the candidate was planning to do vs the candidate. I'm not saying i'm right and you are wrong. Just that I had to look at what direction I thought was right for the country and nothing else. Would I like to have a potus with Carter's ethics and decency? Certainly but I don't think we have had that since W (and I struggle with the idea he knew there were no WMD in iraq.) That is a debate for another thread.

3. We view MAGA differently. I see it as the most radical supporters (10% of his votes). I see the rest as people like me who see him for what he is but see it as the vehicle to restore what's important to me (us). I view conservatism in terms of real world issues. Not broad terms that can be manipulated or applied to any argument. I don't see that trump has hijacked any of the conservative issues that seemed important in the election.

These comments weren't intended to debate. You gave me a foundation for what you believe and I did the same. Understanding why someone believes what they do is generally helpful.
I’m sure we would get along well offline. I see Trump as falling into a completely different category than any other president (and trust me, I’m no Clinton stan). But I think our relevant disagreement is about whether there’s anything resembling responsible conservatism in Trump’s agenda. I don’t see it. Literally nothing. Everything he is doing is contrary to the principles that I believe lead to good governance and a healthy democracy.
 
That’s not a bad question (although it wasn’t directed at me.)

I have loathed the man since I lived in NY in the early 80’s and he was pretty much a joke around the city (he was a foil for Howard Stern and Grayson Carter was dubbing him a “short-fingered vulgarian.”) The notion that this buffoon would someday be serious political figure was (and still is) absurd.

His agenda is cruelty. His primary goal seems to be to annoy and frustrate people who disagree with him. He appoints people who are wholly unfit for their jobs. He is bent on destroying the institutions and systems that make our government work because they stand between him and his goal of using his position to personally enrich himself. He derailed a bipartisan immigration bill for political expediency. He doesn’t want immigration reform, he wants immigration elimination (or at least he did until Elon Musk, another wholly despicable human being, convinced him that bringing in substantially more degreed tech workers without typical workplace safeguards and professional mobility would be beneficial to Musk and his buddies.) Remember when he was going to introduce his replacement plan for Obamacare? How about when he was going to release his tax returns as soon as his audit was completed? Now he has a hare-brained idea that tariffs are the solution to all the economic problems of the country.

In other words I hate his lack of agenda, he just has a jigsaw puzzle of unconnected dots that he hopes somebody smarter than him can develop into policy. His agenda is grievance and retribution. Gulf of America? His agenda is trolling.

I hope that one day you figure it out like so many other conservatives/former Republicans who post here have done over the past ten years.
I thought he was buddies with Stern.

I see it somewhat differently than you. I don't think his agenda is cruelty for the sake of cruelty. I think he is by personality a somewhat cruel person. What 70 year old mocks a disabled person? That isn't a calculated thing, its who he is.

I don't think he is intent on destroying the institutions and systems in our g'ment. I think he thinks like a business man and his default is to look for efficiency gains and to streamline. That is usually my go to line of thinking. I think for the most part he isn't chasing money any longer. He will get richer but in his position you would almost have to try not to, from keeping his net worth from increasing. I think his vanity is driving him to chase "greatness" in the eyes of his voters. He needs constant validation. He knows his position but that isn't enough. He has to have it continually reaffirmed by others. I don't see him as nearly the racist most of you do. I think he again wants to be perceived as great by blacks and latinos. Trump has struck a chord with people who are fed up with political speech / PC / coach speak / etc. Common sense resonates with people and him saying he signed an executive order that the official stance of the fed g'ment on gender is male and female got him more points than anything else he did yesterday. What professional politician is going to say that much less issue a freakin executive order. Can you imagine?

I think he derailed the immigration for two reasons. 1. Vanity - he wanted it done on his watch. 2. I think he thought it was truly a bad bill. I'm not saying it was more of 2 than 1. Just that those were the reasons.
 
I’m sure we would get along well offline. I see Trump as falling into a completely different category than any other president (and trust me, I’m no Clinton stan). But I think our relevant disagreement is about whether there’s anything resembling responsible conservatism in Trump’s agenda. I don’t see it. Literally nothing. Everything he is doing is contrary to the principles that I believe lead to good governance and a healthy democracy.
I have no doubt we would. I would get along well with most here in a face to face setting. The differences on many issues aren't nearly as far apart as they seem. There are a few I would just have to agree to disagree with but that's life.
 
Given the structural advantages Republicans have in the senate, and the tendency toward gridlock (especially as long as the filibuster remains part of the senate process) transferring power from the legislature to the executive would probably be a long-term structural advantage for Democrats.
No Democratic President has ceded executive power.

One thing is certain about the Imperial Presidency - it doesn’t give back or give away power.

Trump’s Second Presidency will assert executive power as no other has. Will the right-wing SCOTUS try to assert its power?
 
No Democratic President has ceded executive power.

One thing is certain about the Imperial Presidency - it doesn’t give back or give away power.

Trump’s Second Presidency will assert executive power as no other has. Will the right-wing SCOTUS try to assert its power?
Donald Trump GIF by GIPHY News
 
Not to dismiss the tasteless attempt at humor, but I believe OGtruthurts was responding to callatoroy’s comment “Then you don't know what the definition of political conservative is.” which Kingpin had quoted in the previous post.
Thanks — I was confused 🤔
 
Fair enough. I'm not questioning your opinions and respect your views as you stated them. I believe for whatever reason you are sincere and am in no way attempting to change your opinions.

1. we are in complete agreement. I want my sons to be the opposite of trump.

2. I gave up on my naive belief that character mattered for potus during the Clinton years. It was difficult for me and I fought it but it seemingly didn't matter to others so I learned to accept it and focus way more on what the candidate was planning to do vs the candidate. I'm not saying i'm right and you are wrong. Just that I had to look at what direction I thought was right for the country and nothing else. Would I like to have a potus with Carter's ethics and decency? Certainly but I don't think we have had that since W (and I struggle with the idea he knew there were no WMD in iraq.) That is a debate for another thread.

3. We view MAGA differently. I see it as the most radical supporters (10% of his votes). I see the rest as people like me who see him for what he is but see it as the vehicle to restore what's important to me (us). I view conservatism in terms of real world issues. Not broad terms that can be manipulated or applied to any argument. I don't see that trump has hijacked any of the conservative issues that seemed important in the election.

These comments weren't intended to debate. You gave me a foundation for what you believe and I did the same. Understanding why someone believes what they do is generally helpful.
Thank you for this response. I also wrestle with how much character matters, just as much as I wrestle with how much intelligence matters - for people in politics. More than anything, however, empathy matters to me. And that is where I believe that we, as a country, have failed the world in electing Trump.

Although I didn’t vote for either of them (not that I could have voted for Sr., as the 2000 election was the first I could vote in), I found both Bushes to be empathetic men. I felt the same way about Romney and Dole. I don’t see any empathy in Trump. If we are being honest, I think Trump views empathy as a weakness, a flawed character trait.

At my heart, I am very much an “ask not what your country can do for you; ask what you can do for your country,” man. I believe that that statement should be at the core of who we are as a nation. It is one of four maxims that I hold dear as it relates to my experience as a United States citizen.

The second one is at the base of the Statue of Liberty:
"Give me your tired, your poor,
Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free,
The wretched refuse of your teeming shore.
Send these, the homeless, tempest-tost to me,
I lift my lamp beside the golden door!”


The third comes from early in the colonial era, and is a from a sermon by John Winthrop: “For we must consider that we shall be as a city upon a hill. The eyes of all people are upon us. So that if we shall deal falsely with our God in this work we have undertaken, and so cause Him to withdraw His present help from us, we shall be made a story and a by-word through the world.”

Those three statements have defined much of who I am and how I choose to identify myself, as a citizen of this country.

Trump strikes me as a man who will never understand that first statement, scoffs at the second, and only views Winthrop’s City Upon the Hill through the lens of power.

For the first time in the course of my nearly half century on earth, I am no longer certain that any of those three quotes represents where this nation is going. And I don’t know what to do with that, other than assume that the fourth American maxim that I hold dear, “life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness,” means something very different to Trump supporters than it does to me.

We can debate policy until the cows come home. But goodness should not be up for debate. Yes. We have had corrupt politicians in the past. Yes, I even voted for some of them. But Trump just hits different.

There is a level of cruelty and vindictiveness to him that is a malignant cancer, and it is spreading across America.

That is where I’m coming from. And I believe that others on here agree with me, particularly those who were once a part of the Republican Party, but left because of a man who views the world through a lens that many of us thought died with WWII, Korea, and Vietnam, at least in this country: one of conquest (personal, political, and global).

Add in Elon Musk, a man who is so wealthy that he will probably die having bought and sold several countries, and I honestly don’t know where we go as a society - not only over the next four years, but for the next 40.

That’s not a perspective that I have ever entertained before, and certainly not to the degree that I do now.

Something wicked this way comes.
 
Last edited:
I honestly don’t know where we go as a society - not only over the next four years, but for the next 40.
We will likely go to a place with significant bloodshed. Historically, economic disparities like we’re seeing now result in mass violence, and it typically starts with the state against its citizenry. With ttump’s recent EOs, we’re not only seeing rampant racism, but what appears an intentional targeting of working and lower-middle class households. He’s also in the early stages of turning military guns inward, and he’ll use them.
 
Beyond that, though. How do we build empathy, as a society, moving forward? integrity? From what source will those come?
 
Beyond that, though. How do we build empathy, as a society, moving forward? integrity? From what source will those come?
Community organizations that build solidarity at the ground level, whether it’s unions, mutual aid societies, clubs, whatever.

The liberal project has to get back to building a positive vision of what society can be rather than simply trying to protect what it is. Liberals must define their program as one of positive liberties instead of negative.
 
I don't think he is intent on destroying the institutions and systems in our g'ment.
He is literally doing that as we speak. Immigration is unlawfully shut down, apparently. The CDC, NIH can't communicate with the outside world, meaning they can't do their jobs. He is putting the biggest enemy of public health in the history of the Republic in charge of the public health agencies, with intent to destroy. Putting a compromised foreign asset in the position of national intelligence. Firing all the career professionals in the DOJ. Decimating the Foreign Service. The intelligence agencies are about to get completely fucked. The FBI will lose everyone competent.

You are on the threads where this is documented. You know this. Yet you conclude that he's not "intent" on doing the things he's actually doing? And please don't respond with some ludicrous about how he's just "reforming" those agencies. That just uses the word "reform" as a tautology. For the idea of reform to have any merit or substance, there has to be a value judgment as to whether the change is good or bad. And that's a complex question in the abstract, but easy in this situation: of course this change is bad. It's incontestably bad. Government by paranoiacs is extremely dangerous.
 
Do you mean that SCOTUS won’t assert its power to preserve constitutional, institutional, historical norms?

Doubt they do that.

Do you mean that SCOTUS won’t try a power-grab of its own?

When power is involved, never underestimate people’s willingness to exert it.
 
Thank you for this response. I also wrestle with how much character matters, just as much as I wrestle with how much intelligence matters - for people in politics. More than anything, however, empathy matters to me. And that is where I believe that we, as a country, have failed the world in electing Trump.

Although I didn’t vote for either of them (not that I could have voted for Sr., as the 2000 election was the first I could vote in), I found both Bushes to be empathetic men. I felt the same way about Romney and Dole. I don’t see any empathy in Trump. If we are being honest, I think Trump views empathy as a weakness, a flawed character trait.

At my heart, I am very much an “ask not what your country can do for you; ask what you can do for your country,” man. I believe that that statement should be at the core of who we are as a nation. It is one of four maxims that I hold dear as it relates to my experience as a United States citizen.

The second one is at the base of the Statue of Liberty:
"Give me your tired, your poor,
Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free,
The wretched refuse of your teeming shore.
Send these, the homeless, tempest-tost to me,
I lift my lamp beside the golden door!”


The third comes from early in the colonial era, and is a from a sermon by John Winthrop: “For we must consider that we shall be as a city upon a hill. The eyes of all people are upon us. So that if we shall deal falsely with our God in this work we have undertaken, and so cause Him to withdraw His present help from us, we shall be made a story and a by-word through the world.”

Those three statements have defined much of who I am and how I choose to identify myself, as a citizen of this country.

Trump strikes me as a man who will never understand that first statement, scoffs at the second, and only views Winthrop’s City Upon the Hill through the lens of power.

For the first time in the course of my nearly half century on earth, I am no longer certain that any of those three quotes represents where this nation is going. And I don’t know what to do with that, other than assume that the fourth American maxim that I hold dear, “life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness,”means something very different to Trump supporters than it does to me.

We can debate policy until the cows come home. But goodness should not be up for debate. Yes. We have had corrupt politicians in the past. Yes, I even voted for some of them. But Trump just hits different.

There is a level of cruelty and vindictiveness to him that is a malignant cancer, and it is spreading across America.

That is where I’m coming from. And I believe that others on here agree with me, particularly those who were once a part of the Republican Party, but left because of a man who views the world through a lens that many of us thought died with WWII, Korea, and Vietnam, at least in this country: one of conquest (personal, political, and global).

Add in Elon Musk, a man who is so wealthy that he will probably die having bought and sold several countries, and I honestly don’t know where we go as a society - not only over the next four years, but for the next 40.

That’s not a perspective that I have ever entertained before, and certainly not to the degree that I do now.

Something wicked this way comes.
Appreciate your post.

What is your 4th maxim?
 
Back
Top