Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
There is no consensus. There are no contemporary or near contemporary written accounts of William I's hair color. There is the Bayeux tapestry which maybe illustrated William with brown hair if the dye hasn't changed in 10 centuries but also included dragons so take that for what its worth. There was an account by a monk named Orderic Vitalis who knew people that knew William I but probably never met William I himself, which described William I as having a "ruddy" appearance. Some historians take that to mean it like we would with skin but other historians say it was a way to describe reddish brown hair.Looking into it, the consensus is that William the Conquerer had darker brown hair, but his son William II had red hair.
In regard to environment, the further you go back, the more there are only white people to do most everything. Yes, I realized that Italians and Jews were not always viewed as being white. White people were the ones who were building bridges, growing crops, committing crimes, performing the majority of every function there was to do. The US, the further you go back, has also been increasingly Christian. In Christianity, men and women often have certain roles and responsibilities.Care to elaborate?
This is an oversimplification for a variety of reasons, but I am still interested to see where you are going with this. How does the above claim, in your mind, relate to the present moment? How will, in the future, historians view the now, as a moment in history, in the long chain of events that is the American Experiment?In regard to environment, the further you go back, the more there are only white people to do most everything. Yes, I realized that Italians and Jews were not always viewed as being white. White people were the ones who were building bridges, growing crops, committing crimes, performing the majority of every function there was to do. The US, the further you go back, has also been increasingly Christian. In Christianity, men and women often have certain roles and responsibilities.
Church-going in that agrarian/hunter-trapper and spread-out society wasn’t a great measure of religious beliefs, TBH.The U.S., at the time the Constitution was signed was the least Christian it ever was. Something like 20-25% went to church in the states. In N.C. and Georgia, it was in single figures.
Wel it was tough to be an Episcopalin back then LOLThe U.S., at the time the Constitution was signed was the least Christian it ever was. Something like 20-25% went to church in the states. In N.C. and Georgia, it was in single figures.
Empirically speaking, I'm not so impressed with that argument since I joined Bear Marsh Baptist Church in Beautancus, N.C. and it was founded in 1757. Rodney Stark, a noted religious historian seemed to have thought it notable as well.Church-going in that agrarian/hunter-trapper and spread-out society wasn’t a great measure of religious beliefs, TBH.
How anyone views any given period of time is far too subjective for me to even speculate on. If you listen to some people today, as it relates to racism, you might think we were still in the 1950s. On the other side are people who want to pretend that racism is all but inoculated. The truth lies somewhere in the middle, of course. The same is true for misogyny.This is an oversimplification for a variety of reasons, but I am still interested to see where you are going with this. How does the above claim, in your mind, relate to the present moment? How will, in the future, historians view the now, as a moment in history, in the long chain of events that is the American Experiment?
Like LeBron getting his shitty kid drafted by the Lakers?Not when your difference is to the ability and willingness to use your inherited advantage to take advantage of others.
Modern conservative Christians would likely be horrified by the religious beliefs of many of the Founding Fathers. Even those who were more openly Christian (Washington, Hamilton) held views that were well removed from those of the modern Religious Right in religious matters and dogma. Denying that the miracles of the Bible actually happened, that Jesus Christ was divine and the product of a virgin birth, and so on. John Adams, for example, believed that religion "was essential for society", but also that "institutional Christianity" had been the cause of much suffering in the world.The U.S., at the time the Constitution was signed was the least Christian it ever was. Something like 20-25% went to church in the states. In N.C. and Georgia, it was in single figures.
So does about any other Christian ever. Maybe not Reverend Ike. It's based on that same prosperity gospel.Modern conservative Christians would likely be horrified by the religious beliefs of many of the Founding Fathers. Even those who were more openly Christian held views that were well removed from those of the modern Religious Right in religious matters and dogma.
“… Arlington's website allowed people to easily search for the graves and learn the backstory of some the country's war heroes under a heading entitled "Notable Graves."Arlington website scrubs bio of Lawrence Joel, Winston-Salem Medal of Honor winner
![]()
Arlington website scrubs bio of Lawrence Joel, Winston-Salem Medal of Honor winner
Changes to the cemetery's official website have also made it more difficult to learn of the bravery of another local Black Medal of Honor recipient, Henry Johnson. Johnson won thejournalnow.com
“A link to the biography and war-time heroics of Lawrence Joel is among those that have been scrubbed from the website of Arlington National Cemetery, a move that is part of the federal government's push to eliminate all references to diversity, equity and inclusion on its websites.
In addition, the changes to the cemetery's official website have also made it more difficult to learn of the bravery of another local Black Medal of Honor recipient, Henry Johnson.
Dozens of links on Arlington's official website have been unpublished over the last few weeks, including those leading to short biographies of prominent Black, women and Hispanic service members. Meanwhile, the links to notable politicians and sports figures remain active. …”
![]()
“… Johnson may soon find himself again unwittingly in the crosshairs of the DEI backlash.“… Arlington's website allowed people to easily search for the graves and learn the backstory of some the country's war heroes under a heading entitled "Notable Graves."
Underneath that heading, a website visitor could click under sub-headings for notable Black, women and Hispanic service members. Those three sub-headings have now disappeared from the website.
Joel's biography was listed under Medal of Honor recipients, however, most of the links to those recipients, including Joel's and Johnson's, no longer exist.
Johnson's bio had been listed under notable Blacks and Medal of Honor recipients. But with those links no longer available, visitors can now find it under Prominent Military Figures, a page that appears to have remained untouched.
By scrubbing Joel's bio from the Arlington website, visitors may never know that the man buried in Section 46 of the cemetery saved 13 soldiers during a Viet Cong attack north of Saigon in November, 1965. Suffering from gunshot wounds to his legs, Joel crawled through a battlefield over a 24-hour period to aid his fellow soldiers. …”
The U.S., at the time the Constitution was signed was the least Christian it ever was. Something like 20-25% went to church in the states. In N.C. and Georgia, it was in single figures.