StrangePackage
Distinguished Member
- Messages
- 303
A lot of people have said it but nobody has produced any proof.I think that's going to be a tough case. Genetically speak, she does have XY chromosomes, right?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
A lot of people have said it but nobody has produced any proof.I think that's going to be a tough case. Genetically speak, she does have XY chromosomes, right?
I would say, at least legally speaking, that genetics are all that matter.I thought genitalia and sex assigned at birth was all that mattered?
Yes, but the claim of DSD kind of implies that there is a conflict between her genes and the other characteristics that make her a female, right?A lot of people have said it but nobody has produced any proof.
“Khelif is a woman, who is not transgender, nor identifies as intersex, according to GLAAD and InterACT. Khelif reportedly has differences of sexual development, known as DSDs, the organizations said in a Fact Sheet released Friday. Having DSD is not the same as being transgender.”I think that's going to be a tough case. Genetically speak, she does have XY chromosomes, right?
I think that's going to be a tough case. Genetically speak, she does have XY chromosomes, right?
The legislators of states concerned with where people pee and who participates in which sports disagree with you. Gender assigned at birth is their litmus test.I would say, at least legally speaking, that genetics are all that matter.
This is the thing for me. The only organization that banned her was the one run by the Russians.Who knows. There are no results. Only Russian propaganda.
I don't know the correct way to make it happen, but for the sake of safety and fairness, we will have to figure out a way to keep those with high testosterone levels from competing against those with low testosterone levels.The legislators of states concerned with where people pee and who participates in which sports disagree with you. Gender assigned at birth is their litmus test.
Should that apply to competitions between those who identify as men, too? Should a track athlete with a testosterone reading of 1500 ng/dL be able to compete against an athlete with 250 ng/dL?I don't know the correct way to make it happen, but for the sake of safety and fairness we will have to figure out a way to keep those with high testosterone levels from competing against those with low testosterone levels.
Testosterone is not the end all, be all hormone in this. Modifying testosterone levels does not necessarily solve the strength imbalance. Moreover, there are some medical risks to suppressing natural hormone levels — as the conservatives keep arguing that point on the puberty blocker debate.I don't know the correct way to make it happen, but for the sake of safety and fairness we will have to figure out a way to keep those with high testosterone levels from competing against those with low testosterone levels.
I don't know if you enforce that rule. Very few biological females choose to compete In male sports particularly once you get into 8th grade or higher. Occasionally you will see a female kicker on a football team or a female wrestler, but it's fairly rare.Should that apply to competitions between those who identify as men, too? Should a track athlete with a testosterone reading of 1500 ng/dL be able to compete against an athlete with 250 ng/dL?
Right. My question is different, though. If testosterone differentials are so impactful, why don’t we pay attention to them in sports contexts where gender variances are not an issue?I don't know if you enforce that rule. Very few biological females choose to compete In male sports particularly once you get into 8th grade or higher. Occasionally you will see a female kicker on a football team or a female wrestler, but it's fairly rare.
What sports contexts are you referring to?Right. My question is different, though. If testosterone differentials are so impactful, why don’t we pay attention to them in sports contexts where gender variances are not an issue?
This sounds like a dangerous path fraught with subjectivity.I don't know the correct way to make it happen, but for the sake of safety and fairness, we will have to figure out a way to keep those with high testosterone levels from competing against those with low testosterone levels.
I agree that there is no easy answer, but testosterone is the hormone that creates the muscular advantage. Decreasing testosterone later in life doesn't undo other possible developmental advantages but, if we are going to allow biological males to compete against biological females, I think there has to be a hormonal component.Testosterone is not the end all, be all hormone in this. Modifying testosterone levels does not necessarily solve the strength imbalance. Moreover, there are some medical risks to suppressing natural hormone levels — as the conservatives keep arguing that point on the puberty blocker debate.
Some sports do require DSD athletes to take hormone suppressors, and the level required to compete keeps changing. There is no scientific consensus as what is too “high” a testosterone level.
And then you have the issue of what genetic differences are fair and what are unfair. We don’t regulate height or speed or coordination - all of which varies genetically. The idea is that certain genetic advantages are inconsistent with the male/female sports divide and we want to regulate those.
It is a complicated issue and just adjusting testosterone is likely not the correct answer.
The one in my post above, for example. Two XYs who identify as men line up next to each other for the men’s 800. One has a T level of 1500. The other has a T level of 250. Should we allow that? Should we, in the interest of fair competition, be testing men to be sure they fall within some “normal” testosterone variance?What sports contexts are you referring to?
Fairness? The entire purpose of sport is to exploit biological superiority and better genetics/physical attributes.I don't know the correct way to make it happen, but for the sake of safety and fairness, we will have to figure out a way to keep those with high testosterone levels from competing against those with low testosterone levels.
Every rule and requirement in sports has a component of subjectivity. Many of those rules and requirements are based around safety and fairness.This sounds like a dangerous path fraught with subjectivity.
I honestly have no idea what the naturally occurring range is for testosterone. I know that athletes can be tested for unusually high levels of testosterone, implying that they are cheating. If two biological males happen to have different naturally occurring testosterone levels, I would see no reason for them to be disallowed from competing.The one in my post above, for example. Two XYs who identify as men line up next to each other for the men’s 800. One has a T level of 1500. The other has a T level of 250. Should we allow that? Should we, in the interest of fair competition, be testing men to be sure they fall within some “normal” testosterone variance?
Sorry sweatie, you’re too fast, you can compete against other cuter girls.I honestly have no idea what the naturally occurring range is for testosterone. I know that athletes can be tested for unusually high levels of testosterone, implying that they are cheating. If two biological males happen to have different naturally occurring testosterone levels, I would see no reason for them to be disallowed from competing.
But, again, I don't know what the range is for naturally occurring testosterone levels. Given that this is all fairly uncharted territory, I'm sure there will be some growing pains, but I think We need to work to come up with a policy that keeps female sports safe and fair.