The sad case of Imane Khelif

  • Thread starter Thread starter grubar
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies: 299
  • Views: 7K
ZenMode said:
It sucks, but this is where empathy, IMO is a weakness and leads people to do the wrong thing. The wrong thing being allowing a male, in the ways being a male matter athletically, to beat up on females.
Click to expand...
You are too clueless to realize that your "wrong thing" is based on empathy. It's just your selective empathy, which is how all empathy-deniers operate. Their empathy is just reason; others' empathy is weakness.
 
superrific said:
You are too clueless to realize that your "wrong thing" is based on empathy. It's just your selective empathy, which is how all empathy-deniers operate. Their empathy is just reason; others' empathy is weakness.
Click to expand...
Nope. My position is based on objective, biological information.

The same reason you wouldn't support a 20-year-old playing football against 10-year-olds is why I don't support males competing against females.
 
ZenMode said:
Yes, it is sad and unfortunate when biology and genetics aren't in sync. I'm going to assume she has a vagina, which is likely the reason she was labeled a female at birth. The rest of her physical appearance (breasts, facial bone structure, etc) certainly appear to be male, along with presumably chromosomes and testosterone levels. It sucks, but this is where empathy, IMO, is a weakness and leads people to do the wrong thing. The wrong thing is allowing a male, in the ways being a male matter athletically, to beat up on females.

Surely a vagina doesn't supercede all other sexual characteristics.
Click to expand...
You still haven't answered my question about chromosome testing.

Are you saying that all females should be chromosome tested to weed out supposed "males" competing in female sports?

Or are you saying that just females with flat chests and masculine features should be chromosome tested?

Or are you saying something else?

Keep in mind that the federation overseeing the testing and doing the leaking is controlled by Putin who likes to stoke these divisive issues in the West -- hence, there is at least some reason to be skeptical about the reported xy result.
 
ZenMode said:
Yes, it is sad and unfortunate when biology and genetics aren't in sync. I'm going to assume she has a vagina, which is likely the reason she was labeled a female at birth. The rest of her physical appearance (breasts, facial bone structure, etc) certainly appear to be male, along with presumably chromosomes and testosterone levels. It sucks, but this is where empathy, IMO, is a weakness and leads people to do the wrong thing. The wrong thing is allowing a male, in the ways being a male matter athletically, to beat up on females.

Surely a vagina doesn't supercede all other sexual characteristics.
Click to expand...
I think this is where we go back and read the OP. The last paragraph in particular.
 
ZenMode said:
Very obvious differences in lean mass, speed and strength due to the developmental difference of pre/post pubescent males.
Click to expand...
So what? Some people are strong; some people aren't. 20 year olds fall into the former category; 10 year olds into the latter. I'm not seeing the problem.
 
superrific said:
So what? Some people are strong; some people aren't. 20 year olds fall into the former category; 10 year olds into the latter. I'm not seeing the problem.
Click to expand...
So, there's a reason we, as a society, already separate male and female sports, divide athletic roughly by age, have weight classes in boxing and wrestling, etc.

There are all things that you not only didn't oppose, but I bet fully supported.... until now. Now it's become a political issue and an empathy issue, so reason goes out the window because your only concern is for the feelings of "Imane", not the list of women getting beat up by Imane.
 
ZenMode said:
So, there's a reason we, as a society, already separate male and female sports, divide athletic roughly by age, have weight classes in boxing and wrestling, etc.
Click to expand...
Yes, and that reason is empathy. This argument is over. You just conceded. Absent empathy, the 20 year old and 10 year old have competing claims of right. The 10 year old says, "don't beat me up, it hurts." The 20 year old says, "But I love it, and the pleasure I get from it is far more than it hurts you." And absent empathy, we have no particularly useful way of sorting it out -- at least not in any manner that can be applied in these circumstances.

The reason that we think the 20 year old beating up the 10 year old is wrong is that we have empathy for the 10 year old, and not the 20 year old bully.

Here's live look-in on super and ZenMode. Starts at 2:00. Zen considers himself quite the ninja, I'd imagine.

 
superrific said:
Yes, and that reason is empathy. This argument is over. You just conceded. Absent empathy, the 20 year old and 10 year old have competing claims of right. The 10 year old says, "don't beat me up, it hurts." The 20 year old says, "But I love it, and the pleasure I get from it is far more than it hurts you." And absent empathy, we have no particularly useful way of sorting it out -- at least not in any manner that can be applied in these circumstances.

The reason that we think the 20 year old beating up the 10 year old is wrong is that we have empathy for the 10 year old, and not the 20 year old bully.

Here's live look-in on super and ZenMode. Starts at 2:00. Zen considers himself quite the ninja, I'd imagine.

Click to expand...

It's not empathy. It's general societal agreement regading the need to promote fairness and safety based on objective realities related to biology and physics.
 
Calheel said:
You still haven't answered my question about chromosome testing.

Are you saying that all females should be chromosome tested to weed out supposed "males" competing in female sports?

Or are you saying that just females with flat chests and masculine features should be chromosome tested?

Or are you saying something else?

Keep in mind that the federation overseeing the testing and doing the leaking is controlled by Putin who likes to stoke these divisive issues in the West -- hence, there is at least some reason to be skeptical about the reported xy result.
Click to expand...
How to keep males out of female sports is a different question than whether or not we should keep males out of female sports. How a state handles it will likely be different than how the IOC handles it.

I'm not claiming to be an expert of the "how".
 
Last edited:
A long time ago, a guy named Nathan, who was not good at sports, challenged me for some reason to a game of one-on-one hoops. I told him it wouldn't be fair, so I'd play with my left hand behind my back. I won 11-1. Then I switched it up and played with my right hand behind my back. I won 11-4.

Nathan was more competitive than ZenMode.
 
superrific said:
LOL. Fairness is a form of empathy.

All practical ethics is based on religion or empathy. Without one of the two, nothing matters.
Click to expand...
Fairness is a form of sympathy. Sympathy is a good thing. Empathy is, again, why you discard fairness and reason, and the experience of many females, in favor of the experience of one person.
 
ZenMode said:
Fairness is a form of sympathy. Sympathy is a good thing. Empathy is, again, why you discard fairness and reason, and the experience of many females, in favor of the experience of one person.
Click to expand...
You are again confusing sympathy and empathy. Sympathy is fundamentally about pity, which is emotional and not reason. Empathy is different; it's the desire to take multiple perspectives into account when making judgments.

I don't care if you want to continue this bullshit. You've had your arms and legs cut off, and you are not in fact going to bite my legs off. I'm going on my way. Toodles.
 
superrific said:
You are again confusing sympathy and empathy. Sympathy is fundamentally about pity, which is emotional and not reason. Empathy is different; it's the desire to take multiple perspectives into account when making judgments.

I don't care if you want to continue this bullshit. You've had your arms and legs cut off, and you are not in fact going to bite my legs off. I'm going on my way. Toodles.
Click to expand...
It’s only a flesh wound.
 
superrific said:
You are again confusing sympathy and empathy.
Click to expand...
I'm not.
superrific said:
Sympathy is fundamentally about pity, which is emotional and not reason.
Click to expand...
Sympathy is feeling sorry for someone for what they are going through.

Unlike empathy, sympathy is not putting yourself in their place and feeling their feelings.
superrific said:
Empathy is different; it's the desire to take multiple perspectives into account when making judgments.
Click to expand...
It's literally feeling their feelings. You are putting yourself in their place and making decisions based on their feelings, not what is the reasonable thing to do.
superrific said:
I don't care if you want to continue this bullshit. You've had your arms and legs cut off, and you are not in fact going to bite my legs off. I'm going on my way. Toodles.
Click to expand...
An unjustified victory lap isn't going to work.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top