I'm literally quoting one from the Reddit he had just posted.
How does it make no sense? We're talking about open season on the heads of corporations that profit off of death and suffering, right?
You're not good at this.
Again, and very weak comparison.
"We're not gloating. We're just making fun of this person's death and making excuses for it, but since we aren't specifically saying we are 'gloating' that isn't what we are doing." Please.
Not at all. The dude (or dudette) in charge of those corporations makes millions off of products that kill, maim, and disable people.
Again, people choose to drink beer. People don't choose to get cancer or other illnesses that are no fault of their own. You really going to compare a guy drinking beer to a.kid with cancer? And illnesses like that kill a lot more people than alcohol does. It's really a stupid comparison.
People don't choose to get slammed into by drunk drivers. People don't choose to get beaten by alcoholic parents. Alcohol is addictive and coincidentally contributes to a lot of cancers. Why are you JCDing millionaires who get rich off of killing people?
If people wouldn't make light (or worse) of this man's murder, I would have nothing to quote.
I see you're an idiot, and I am at the point in my life where I don't have the time or energy to engage with idiots. So, super ignore it is. Have fun talking to yourself.
Preexisting condition. Thankfully, my insurance still covers it.
We have no doubt that there are folks out there who don't give 2 shits that the murder took place, and some may even have a bit of schadenfreude-type "glee". But no one on this board seems to have indicated they feel that way, yet you still seem hell bent on baiting. Why? And as far as beer CEO's and that analogy... why not call out the CEO of McDonald's or other shitty fast food factories for the death and mayhem they cause? There are several industries we could call out. How about the CEO of a popular gun manufacturer? Now that would be some just desserts wouldn't it? Remington Firearms CEO Ken D'Arcy would be an appropriate target don't you think?
Absolutely. I think all of those people would be fair game in this war that many people (not on here) are advocating. Which is why I think it is ridiculous and needs to be called out. Zeynep Tufekci (another UNC alumnae) has an article about this in the NYT today. At the time of her writing the article, 75k of the 80k reactions of UHC's social media post announcing the murder of their CEO were the "laughing" emojis. As I've said before, I'm willing to bet that 99.9% of those 75k people would accept $10 million per year to fill the exact same position with zero qualms or hesitation. Was this guy evil while the rest of us are somehow pure? Absolutely not.
Like I said, those folks are feeling a bit of schadenfreude-type "glee" because - in the comfort of their own homes - they think it's sort of a comeuppance for the CEO. Perhaps folks feel the CEO Fucked Around and Found Out. But given that, I doubt we are seeing the tipping point of the all-out "war on CEO's of companies which may cause death and destruction directly due to the product(s) they produce or supply." And, again NOBODY on this board is advocating for such.
I thought it was still a concept of a best plan, did I miss the transition to an actual best plan?
Valid voluntary manslaughter in many cases??? What the fuck dude?
