1. The way some of these media are treating the race and sex issues . . . well, I guess the bulwark are former Republicans so I shouldn't expect too much on this score.
2. There are two distinct sets of racism/sexism issues. They are related but non-identical.
A. First, there's the "people didn't vote for Harris because she was a black woman." I believe we will see evidence of that. But regardless, this isn't a claim about 100% of Trump voters or even 95% of Trump voters. It is no answer to say, "nobody refused to vote for Harris because she was a woman because young women who voted Biden also voted Trump." It only takes 1 out of 100 voters to refuse to go Kamala to make a big impact.
It is also just bogus to try to cut and paste the issue out of existence. It can be true that Puerto Rican men refused to vote for a woman, and white women didn't want to vote for a black person. In fact, that is almost certainly true (the only actual question is about the frequency). You can't cut out the sexism from one population, cut out the racism from another, and then combine the two groups to say, "see, it was all clean!"
B. More importantly, the main issue was the substance of the campaigns. Most MAGAs didn't vote for Trump specifically because he was a white man. They voted for him because he is promising vengeance upon brown and black people. Racial animosity remains undefeated as a predictor of Trump support. And we saw the most racist filthy and disgusting campaign in our lifetimes. Hmm. Whether Puerto Ricans swallowed their pride to vote as they did doesn't affect the fact that Trump ran on racism; he won on racism; he is going to govern on racism; and he's probably going to torch the country because of racism.
3. Everyone who votes in the last election in a country is expecting there to be a next election, and that it will be free and fair. Some % of those people are wrong.
4. We're supposed to educate voters? I thought that was the thing we were doing wrong! That we can't explain to voters how tariffs work or how inflation works because that's preachy and dismissive? But now, I see, the Bulwark is back on the explain the world to Trump voters train. Maybe it never got off that train. I read the Bulwark when CFord posts it and not other times.