Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yeah, that’s totally fair. I probably do too.Lot of good there, but I have to admit, whenever I see someone say we have to get prices down, I immediately knock them down a few pegs on the credibility list.
All things considered, do you believe the average voter considers executive orders?It may be over blown. At the very least there isn't a truly good solution. But, again, the point isn't to debate bathroom usage, it's about the perception of priorities by the Biden admin.
I doubt most voters take note of EOs, but things like that are brought up during election season. I think people are more likely to notice that Biden took 2+ years to take any action on the border because stand-alone EOs are likely to make the news.All things considered, do you believe the average voter considers executive orders?
I think the party has to look at how they present their ideas better, but it's hard to overcome low information and single issue voters.
As depressing as it is, this short paragraph probably the most important:Thought this was a really good and really important read and wanted to share it here.
![]()
There Are No Permanent Defeats
"A loss, however painful, is not the end of the world. Every election result is provisional. There are multiple examples in recent memory of the American electorate delivering victories to a party and then swiftly reversing course.
This is not to minimize the seriousness of the mistake voters have made this year, just to keep some perspective. There are many turns of the wheel.
The Democrats will do themselves some good if this loss causes them to reconsider their boutique views on immigration, public safety, trans athletes, and other matters. But the thumping rightward shift in the electorate between 2020 and 2024 suggests to me that this election really came down (mostly) to inflation, with a side of immigration, rather than an embrace of Trump or Trumpism.
Most voters decide based upon their own financial condition. This year, 68 percent of voters rated the economy as “not so good” or “poor.” Yes, the other economic indicators were great, but 75 percent said inflation had inflicted moderate or severe hardship on them. All of the stock market gains, employment, and economic growth in the world cannot compensate for that. Compared with Joe Biden in 2020, Kamala Harris lost ground with nearly every demographic—urban, suburban, rural, you name it. Even among women voters, Harris did worse than Biden, with the exceptions of urban women, senior women, and those with a college degree.
It’s impossible to gauge how big a part racism and sexism played in Harris’s performance—few will admit such motivations. Harris performed a bit worse with Hispanic women than Biden did. Was that closet sexism? Doubtful. Nor does it seem plausible that so many young women who voted for Biden switched to Trump out of misogyny. Fully 45 percent of the electorate said they were financially worse off today than four years ago, which is a greater percentage than any year since the 2008 Great Recession. Only 26 percent of voters were satisfied or enthusiastic about how things are going in the country, whereas 43 percent were dissatisfied and 29 percent were angry.
For all the attention paid to white voters’ affection for Trump, their approval of Trump has declined from 57 percent in 2020 to 49 percent in 2024. And while much is being made, justifiably, about the big swing toward Trump among Hispanics, he remains unpopular among them. Only 42 percent of Latinos have a favorable view of Trump.
This underscores the importance of people’s personal financial condition. They will hire a creep if they think he’ll improve their personal prospects. Most voters neither understand nor particularly care about the rule of law or foreign policy (beyond war and peace).
Much will change before the next election—and yes, there will be more elections. The winning party will nearly always over-interpret its mandate and go too far, prompting a backlash at the polls. The president’s party typically loses seats in off year elections, so expect a rebuke in 2026. (One of the most dangerous depredations of Trump 1.0 was undermining faith in elections and attempting to subvert the 2020 outcome, so Democrats must be prepared to fight tooth and nail over interference with any election going forward.)
Democrats cannot just wait for the election cycle to solve their problems. There are a number of lessons they should take to heart from this year’s results: 1) the abortion issue has likely run its course as a motivator in national elections (though it remains potent statewide); 2) Hispanic voters cannot be taken for granted as part of the Democratic coalition; 3) woke postures like taxpayer-funded sex change operations for incarcerated immigrants are toxic; and 4) big federal spending programs don’t deliver immediate political dividends.
Much has been said and written about matters 1 through 3, so let me address 4. Of all people, Joe Biden should have understood that passing big bills like the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act and the Inflation Reduction Act would not be noticed by voters in time for 2024. He was vice president when the Affordable Care Act passed and witnessed that not only was Obama not rewarded for it, Democrats lost the House in 2010.
Only much later, after it had been fully implemented and people began to enjoy the benefits (and Republicans failed to come up with an alternative), did the program become popular. Both the IRA and the infrastructure bill, ironically, contain lavish spending for rural and Trump-friendly parts of the country that will begin to come online just in time for Trump to take credit for them. The legislation may or may not have been good policy, but it’s important for Democrats to recognize that passing big bills doesn’t translate into votes—at least not right away.
The Democratic party has suffered a setback, not a wipeout. The country remains closely divided. Democrats still hold nearly half the seats in the Senate and (depending on the races still outstanding) nearly half of the House. Twenty-three states have Democratic governors. Democratic office holders need to gird their loins for the avalanche of lies, scandals, outrages, and betrayals that a second Trump term is sure to deliver. They must prepare to educate voters about the consequences of Trump’s tariffs (which are taxes), deportations, tax cuts, vaccine misinformation, and whatever other insane policies emanate from MAGA Washington.
There’s a place for autopsies and wound licking, but it’s soon time to move forward."
Do you allow unknown females into your house to use the restroom with your daughter?No, but I also don't allow unknown males into my house to use the restroom with my daughter.
I am mad at how much the steaks cost, so I will vote for the guy who is going to round up the workers who make them and put up tariffs on the machines that slice them. That'll bring prices down. Very hard to get me out of FAFO mode right now.Lot of good there, but I have to admit, whenever I see someone say we have to get prices down, I immediately knock them down a few pegs on the credibility list.
Do you allow unknown females into your house to use the restroom with your daughter?
Yeah I completely understand people being upset about prices being high. What I don't understand is that people don't even make the barest effort to try to understand why the prices are high, what the current government had to do with it (or didn't), and how (if at all) electing someone different will change it. I simply can't condone ignorance for the sake of ignorance. In this day and age there is no excuse for not spending just a few minutes of effort to attempt to understand these things. I'm not saying everyone will reach the same conclusion - that's Democracy in action! - but "inflation was low when Trump was in office, inflation is high now, therefore Trump will lower inflation" is not a substitute for critical thinking.I am mad at how much the steaks cost, so I will vote for the guy who is going to round up the workers who make them and put up tariffs on the machines that slice them. That'll bring prices down. Very hard to get me out of FAFO mode right now.
I would suggest that you consider allowing that before you allow Trump into the house with your daughter. Trump would be significantly more likely to rape them than a random sampling of unknown men.No, but I also don't allow unknown males into my house to use the restroom with my daughter.
No. That would be weird, also.Do you allow unknown females into your house to use the restroom with your daughter?
Right - which is the whole point, that the gender of the person doesn't make any difference. When your child, male or female, goes into a public restroom, they are doing so with strangers, male or female, who you probably wouldn't let come use the bathroom at your house. What is bizarre is that thinking that allowing trans people (a tiny minority of the population) to use the restroom of the gender with which they identify somehow increases the likelihood that your child will be assaulted or violated in the restroom - something which is obviously already illegal.No. That would be weird, also.
Like I said yesterday, the debate about restrooms is a secondary issue. The issue, to the degree that there is one, is that Biden used an EO to guarantee males access to girls bathrooms within weeks of taking office, but took over 2 years to use EO to address the border crisis.Right - which is the whole point, that the gender of the person doesn't make any difference. When your child, male or female, goes into a public restroom, they are doing so with strangers, male or female, who you probably wouldn't let come use the bathroom at your house. What is bizarre is that thinking that allowing trans people (a tiny minority of the population) to use the restroom of the gender with which they identify somehow increases the likelihood that your child will be assaulted or violated in the restroom - something which is obviously already illegal.
The difference is that the first is a yes or no and affects very few people in any tangible fashion. The other affects millions, the national economy and international relations. Which decision requires time, research and diplomacy? I know nuance isn't highly valued but neither is the thoughts of a fool.Like I said yesterday, the debate about restrooms is a secondary issue. The issue, to the degree that there is one, is that Biden used an EO to guarantee males access to girls bathrooms within weeks of taking office, but took over 2 years to use EO to address the border crisis.
It's a perception of priorities. An EO for transgender students is welcomed by Democrats, so it's put into place almost immediately. An EO to address the crisis of people illegally entering the country by the millions is likely viewed as racist.
I like Trae’s take:
Even if it's true that it takes years to take action, that situation is only one of several. The NYTimes opinion I posted on an earlier page talks about some others. Yes, it's just opinion and nobody knows for sure, even with exit polling, why Harris lost.The difference is that the first is a yes or no and affects very few people in any tangible fashion. The other affects millions, the national economy and international relations. Which decision requires time, research and diplomacy? I know nuance isn't highly valued but neither is the thoughts of a fool.