ChapelHillSooner
Honored Member
- Messages
- 890
Let me use a different term. Low opinion voters.Low information is prototypical MAGA. To the core. Except the ones smart enough to grift the rest.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Let me use a different term. Low opinion voters.Low information is prototypical MAGA. To the core. Except the ones smart enough to grift the rest.
Given that Trump hasn't taken office and hasn't actually done anything, then yes. We all re-think decisions after the fact.So would you say that this is more normal behavior and not suggestive of anything more?
Would that even make a difference with his base, given what we've seen of his decade-long string of shenanigans? (Hint: no.)Putin just reminding Trump he still has the pee tapes.
Yep. Owning all of those meanie-head arrogant elitist educated libs is all fun and games until you get 12% inflation, 10% mortgage rates, $4,000 household appliances, your SS and disability benefits slashed, and your wife/daughter/granddaughter bleeds out in her car in the parking lot of the fourth ER that won’t admit and treat her ongoing miscarriage because the doctors are all afraid of going to prison.It makes more sense if you look at it like football. So what if they talked a little trash, it’s just football. Just admit the better team won, no reason to not want to be friends over it.
Right now it seems like they are starting to realize what they’ve won. We’ll have to see if this is durable and just how far this all goes.
This is the same thought I've had. I don't know what dirt he has on trump but it wouldn't make a single bit of difference. I don't care the evidence either, it'd be dismissed. He should just turn the tables on that mofo now.Would that even make a difference with his base, given what we've seen of his decade-long string of shenanigans? (Hint: no.)
Lololol
It was in jest, I totally agree with you. I think Trump could take a dump on stage during a debate and he'd probably garner even more voter support than before.Would that even make a difference with his base, given what we've seen of his decade-long string of shenanigans? (Hint: no.)
Not at this level. I've always known who and why I was voting.Given that Trump hasn't taken office and hasn't actually done anything, then yes. We all re-think decisions after the fact.
I posted on IC some years ago that the Dems should roll out ads on tv, online media, etc. explaining what Dems were doing to help the average American and what Pubs were doing to hurt them. Run them throughout the years, not just election years. Keep pounding home the messages. No need to address individuals or parties pro or con until election years. The right had Fox and then all the online crazier outlets.Some of you were posting earlier about how "blind" policy polls of Americans show they overwhelmingly support Democratic and liberal positions until you finally attach D to them. I mentioned this yesterday in another thread but couldn't find the supporting studies. Thank you all for providing!
It also reminds how, whenever comedians or pollsters ask Americans about Obamacare, they overwhelmingly approve when it's called the ACA. Once you attach the "Obamacare" moniker to it, many immediately disapprove. Even conservatives overwhelmingly like it when they know it only as the ACA.
This all demonstrates two things: 1) Americans are incredibly ignorant; and, 2) while Democrats may or may not have won the culture war (that remains to be seen), they are at least a solid decade behind in building the media infrastructure to compete with conservatives. They're already fighting with one hand behind their back with Electoral College and the Senate naturally favoring red states; they may as well have both hands tied, lacking a competitive media/propaganda infrastructure.
Big part of Democratic failure in general since 2008: failure to organize outside of presidential election years. Whether it be advertising like you say or anything really.I posted on IC some years ago that the Dems should roll out ads on tv, online media, etc. explaining what Dems were doing to help the average American and what Pubs were doing to hurt them. Run them throughout the years, not just election years. Keep pounding home the messages. No need to address individuals or parties pro or con until election years. The right had Fox and then all the online crazier outlets.
Why is this administration/congress against providing for clean water to drink and clean air to breath for us citizens of this great country while dismantling environmental protections to allow large corporations to pollute as they wish? (With corresponding images to fit the message). Or the reverse. Etc. [Not a marketing guy/cooywriter myself but you get the message]
Both targeted national and statewide.
Fair and I appreciate you sharing that perspective.Given that Trump hasn't taken office and hasn't actually done anything, then yes. We all re-think decisions after the fact.
At this point, no.Would that even make a difference with his base, given what we've seen of his decade-long string of shenanigans? (Hint: no.)
My thought as well. At this point Putin has no leverage. Ttump can’t be embarrassed because narcissistic sociopaths just lie to themselves and their cult parishioners, with impunity. Ttump has access to the US coffers (ie our money) and untold number of bribes and extortions, so money isn’t an issue. And on those bribes and extortions, the scotus determined the US presidency s imperial, so legality matters not. Even if Putin has a piss tape, hell a shit tape, ttump will just say it isn’t him and “I hear some people like that sort of thing”, and maga will move on to the next meme.This is the same thought I've had. I don't know what dirt he has on trump but it wouldn't make a single bit of difference. I don't care the evidence either, it'd be dismissed. He should just turn the tables on that mofo now.
Well, despite rumors of the “liberal media,” Democrats don’t have the luxury of a compliant media willing to repeat their talking points and relentlessly spread their propaganda such as the bubble Republicans enjoy.Big part of Democratic failure in general since 2008: failure to organize outside of presidential election years. Whether it be advertising like you say or anything really.
Republicans deliberately built that bubble and now are enjoying the fruits of their labor. Democrats didn’t. Hindsight is 20/20, but we can acknowledge the need for this going forward.Well, despite rumors of the “liberal media,” Democrats don’t have the luxury of a compliant media willing to repeat their talking points and relentlessly spread their propaganda such as the bubble Republicans enjoy.
Another advantage conservatives have is that they play upon fear of the unknown, which is incredibly appealing to what I call the average person's "lizard brain receptor." Conservatives don't have to necessarily propose policies; they only have to demonstrate how they'll protect you from this or that "scary" thing.I posted on IC some years ago that the Dems should roll out ads on tv, online media, etc. explaining what Dems were doing to help the average American and what Pubs were doing to hurt them. Run them throughout the years, not just election years. Keep pounding home the messages. No need to address individuals or parties pro or con until election years. The right had Fox and then all the online crazier outlets.
Why is this administration/congress against providing for clean water to drink and clean air to breath for us citizens of this great country while dismantling environmental protections to allow large corporations to pollute as they wish? (With corresponding images to fit the message). Or the reverse. Etc. [Not a marketing guy/cooywriter myself but you get the message]
Both targeted national and statewide.
The answer on the left for lizard brain people looking for something to fear has always been billionaires and the elites. It wasn’t until fairly recently that the Democratic Party decided that these people would be coddled and be given decision making rights over the party’s future.Another advantage conservatives have is that they play upon fear of the unknown, which is incredibly appealing to what I call the average person's "lizard brain receptor." Conservatives don't have to necessarily propose policies; they only have to demonstrate how they'll protect you from this or that "scary" thing.
Liberals need to figure out how to do this too. Not with immigrants, transgender people, etc., obviously. But with things like you mentioned. Why do conservatives want you and your family to die from polluted water? That sort of thing. And I don't care how much conservatives or others complain. Do it. Because, honestly, it's not a lie. Be nasty too. Truth is on your side. Why do conservatives want your daughter to bleed out at a hospital? Why does Trump want Saudi money? Why, don't you know they were behind 9/11 and Islamic terrorism? Killed Americans along with his Taliban friends he freed. Those sorts of things.
And it's not enough just to say it once or twice, or even for a couple weeks (like the attack on Republicans being "weird" that Kamala used when first became prospective nominee and seemed effective but then just immediately stopped doing). You have to do it ad nauseum. Over and over and over.