Callatoroy
Distinguished Member
- Messages
- 457
Not answering the question
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I guess I just don't understand or agree with this line of thinking. It would be like if Democrats demanded to know why Republicans refuse to denounce kindergarteners getting massacred in their classrooms. Nobody who is serious or reasonable- even if they disagree with Republican gun control policies- thinks that Republicans are "okay" with elementary schoolers getting turned into a shooting gallery.Seems they would take one of the many opportunities that have been presented to set the record straight.
The real answer is, just like most Republican voters have an abortion position similar to what JD Vance just articulated, most Democratic voters have an abortion position similar to what you guys advocate for on here.
What folks on here miss though is, just as the actual Republican politicians are beholden to the lunatics on the religious right on this issue, the Democratic politicians twist themselves into a pretzel to not draw ANY line in the sand, even when repeatedly pressed on it and asked to clarify.
TLDR - politicians suck on this issue
Why should they? People should be able to read the numbers. The problem is the cult believes drump when he states that a child can be aborted after the child is born. If they believe stupid lies like that, there's no helping them.Good answer by Vance on abortion
Walz predictably doesn’t answer if he’s ok with 9th month abortions. No clue why Democrats will never come out and denounce that, especially given how rare they are.
Exactly. Walz should go after the lies. He’s not. He’s letting Vance off the hook.
On the one hand, I doubt anyone thinks that is what he meant, but yeah.
I’m watching the Braves game for a bit, just to torture myself.
I recently read that less than 1% of abortions are in the last trimester, but they are not for birth control. They are normally for the life of the mother at that point.YOU RADICAL LIBS, YOU HAVE TO DENOUNCE SOMETHING THAT NEVER HAPPENS, OR ELSE I'LL HAVE NO CHOICE BUT TO BELIEVE THAT YOU SUPPORT THE MURDER OF BABIES IN THE THIRD TRIMESTER, WHICH DOESN'T EVER HAPPEN!
Vance taking a softened stance on abortion is an acknowledgement that the Democrats are winning the issue.Walz is doing an ok job overall but Vance schooled him on abortion just now. Vance was willing to take a centrist position on abortion but Walz was not.
Noteworthy given that abortion is generally an issue that Democrats win on.
And this is exactly why Pubs wanted there to be no fact checking by the moderators. It's very challenging for an opponent to respond to an avalanche of lies in real time while also articulating their own talking points.Exactly. Walz should go after the lies. He’s not. He’s letting Vance off the hook.
On the one hand, I doubt anyone thinks that is what he meant, but yeah.
I’m watching the Braves game for a bit, just to torture myself.
Well, your party certainly has a very strange way of showing their support for abortion, no?Most do but you wouldn’t know that being stuck in this board all day
Not the same and not an answer to what was asked but I admire your jcding
Both impressive and makes how we landed on Harris vs Trump stunning.Vance doesn't sound like a MAGA lunatic and Walz doesn't sound like socialist, Marxist, radical leftist.