An analogy would be when they ask pro-life Republicans if they would outlaw abortions even in cases of rape/incest/life of mother. And usually most (sane) Republicans are able to say publicly they’re ok with the exceptions. Trump for sure has said this.
What he’s doing is positioning himself for his own run next time around. He knows trump is in trouble and is setting himself up by not going to bat for trump anymore than he has to, and picking and choosing the effective points of trump’s platform.
He is literally too stupid to effectively insult
Agreed. It’s actually refreshing to listen to these two guys debate. Both are pretty good. I wish these two guys were at the top of the tickets instead of Harris and Trump.
he definitely sounds more reasonable and is more well-spoken but he's still lying incessantly.
Harris sounded perfectly normal in the last debate. It’s not stunning at all she’s the candidate. She’s a great one.
He meant to say "I've become friends with victims of school shootings", but he's trying to talk too fast. Just slow down.
You seem triggered Cat. Can’t get a good night’s sleep if so angry.
She’s fine. She did well in debate. She is not good in interviews and she doesn’t answer questions well on her feet.
Agreed. No chance she would’ve beat Tim Walz in a primary (or JD Vance in a general)
No they are going to 25th Trump
The difference is that there are state laws on the books, passed by Republicans, that don't allow for those exceptions. That ban abortion after just a few weeks. That criminalize doctors provide abortions leading to people getting killed.
Except Harris is an amazing candidate and one we’ll be fortunate to call President.
Most Republicans may, but they keep voting for extremists who don't.
I think we may be talking in circles here. I'm not familiar with any singular Democratic politician who has ever said that elective abortions should be legal in the 3rd trimester, so I suppose they don't see a need to answer a weird hypothetical that is most likely not being asked in good faith. That's just my guess, but it's only a guess. I just think it's probably seen as an attempted "gotcha" question that isn't worth validating.
Of course he is - that's always been a part of politics, no matter what anyone tells you. And not, candidly, unique to any party.
